Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Still Undecided On Joining Landmines Treaty

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:11 PM
Original message
U.S. Still Undecided On Joining Landmines Treaty
Source: REUTERS

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States has still not decided whether it will sign a 1997 global treaty to ban land mines but said on Tuesday it has invested heavily to help mitigate the impact the weapons have around the world.

Releasing the State Department's annual review on the destruction of conventional weapons, a senior official acknowledged that a review of U.S. landmines policy -- which has been ongoing since last year -- is not yet complete.

The United States has not signed the Mine Ban Treaty or a global treaty banning cluster munitions, despite what it says are world-leading efforts to provide assistance for the clearance of landmines as well as the destruction of unsecured weapons and munitions.

"Just because we haven't signed those treaties doesn't mean we don't understand the humanitarian effects of those type of munitions," said Brigadier General Thomas Masiello, deputy assistant secretary for political and military affairs. "And that's why the United States (is) the largest contributor to both demining and conventional weapons destruction."

He said the United States had provided more than $1.5 billion since 1993 to clear landmines and unexploded ordnance and treat accident victims. In 2009 it gave $130 million in aid to 32 countries, he said.

Read more: http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0804/undecided-joining-landmines-treaty/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AmericaIsGreat Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah you can't ban mines man
We're going to be using them shortly. We're going to plant them on all the paths taken by the Taliban/Al Qaeda in the hills and mountains because, hey, fucking nothing else has worked and we're out of ideas so let's just throw anything at it. Anything at all.

This will work, I swear it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pasto76 Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. actually, there have been alot of things that have worked
but we're basically talking about a group of 40 million. So it will take a while. Even following stuff on DU, you should have noticed that the drones have been extremely effective, and al quaeda leadership has relocated to Yemen and UAE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. How does that relocation show the effectiveness of drone strikes?
Isn't that simply scattering the enemy across a bigger field?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. And probably the border with Canada, Too
It will take care of those pesky geese...oh, maybe that's what the cluster bombs are for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh come on. Let's be fair! There are a lot of, like, really great things about land mines
I mean, it's not that simple, you know?

Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well after all
they do have a 10 million mine stockpile that they have to use up first.

What a bunch of murderous fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. The only justification for this I've heard is that without them N Korea would take over the world.
or something silly like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. This is shameless.

Our military industrial nation... :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
9. land mines lay in wait long after the conflict for a passing child
I am ashamed of our nations priorities!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. All un-manned weapons should be banned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC