Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry: Net-neutrality legislation unlikely, FCC must act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 06:20 PM
Original message
Kerry: Net-neutrality legislation unlikely, FCC must act
Source: The Hill

A congressional stalemate has made passage of a net-neutrality bill unlikely for the time being, according to a statement from Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) on Thursday. Kerry said regulation by the Federal Communications Commission is now the best option for government oversight of broadband Internet access.

“As we work to find a path forward for governing broadband, Congressional stalemate is making a legislative solution look increasingly unlikely in the near term," Kerry said. "As a result, Chairman Genachowski is now moving forward along a regulatory path. While this is an imperfect solution, it’s his only real option to maintain the proper role of government oversight in communications."

Kerry's statement comes soon after the FCC announced it will cancel the latest round of talks between broadband stakeholders because they had failed generate a framework to preserve the openness of the Internet. Two of those stakeholders, Google and Verizon, are reportedly close to their own agreement that has seemingly undermined the FCC's negotiations.

S. Derek Turner, research director for the public interest group Free Press, said his organization welcomed the dissolution of the talks because of their closed-door nature. He encouraged the FCC to take decisive action to protect Internet users by pushing forward clear net-neutrality rules. Kerry, a strong supporter of net neutrality himself, also encouraged the FCC to take action using its regulatory authority.



Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/112935-kerry-net-neutrality-legislation-unlikely-fcc-must-act
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SILVER__FOX52 Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. God Damn it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Get something done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Uh, Kerry? The FCC *did* act.
The courts then found that the FCC needed congressional authority to take control over privately owned and operated networks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think Senator Kerry is
aware of the court decision: Kerry on FCC Court Case:

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.), Chairman of the Commerce Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the Internet, today released a statement following a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) lacks the authority to oversee internet traffic restrictions by internet providers like Comcast.

“This is a history-making decision. It appears to vacate the authority of the FCC to conduct oversight over broadband service and the telephone and cable giants that own the wires,” said Sen. Kerry. “I am not advocating that the FCC reclassify broadband services as a result of this decision, but I absolutely believe they maintain that legal authority and it would be entirely consistent with the history of communications law in our country if they did. In fact, in cases involving FCC classification of services, the Supreme Court has always deferred to the agency. It is likely to continue doing so if the agency reversed and provided a strong rationale for updating the Bush era classification of broadband service.

“Broadband was in its nascent stages when the Bush Administration established its policy, but is now an integral part of our economy, the way we communicate, and our daily lives. Without oversight, market giants would be free to do as they wish even if their actions hindered the free flow of information, treated consumers unfairly, or discriminated against content creators. In the long run, we may need a new legal and regulatory framework for broadband, especially if reclassifying broadband as a telecommunications service proves too difficult to administer. I am willing to work with all interested parties on the construction of that framework. But the FCC can and must continue the role it has always played protecting consumers and encouraging the deployment of networks through the development of every communications technology, from the telephone to radio and television to wireless communications.

“I was a member of the Senate Commerce Committee during consideration of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. I know the Congress did not intend for cable and telephone broadband internet service providers to fall outside the authority of the FCC to protect consumers, protect against discrimination, provide public safety officials with priority access to service, ensure that people with disabilities are given consideration, or ensure that modern communications are available to everyone in America.”




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "provide public safety officials with priority access to service" LOL
Thanks for digging up that gem, it's a funny one.

So, Kerry urges the FCC to act, it does, the courts say no, go to congress, Kerry says no deal in congress, the FCC should do it?

That seems a tad loopy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The FCC was in the process of acting
but abandoned the effort today. Please get the facts straight.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm not sure they "abandoned" the effort
It seems that they have decided that further meetings with the telecoms are pointless, not necessarily that there is nothing they can do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC