Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Imperial County appeals judge's overturning of gay marriage ban

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:18 PM
Original message
Imperial County appeals judge's overturning of gay marriage ban
Source: LA Times

The County of Imperial filed an appeal Tuesday with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals challenging U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker's ruling that deemed Proposition 8's ban of same-sex marriage unconstitutional.

The County Board of Supervisors voted 4-1 earlier in the day to approve the appeal, according to the Imperial Valley Press. Voters in Imperial County voted overwhelmingly in favor of Prop. 8, which enshrined a definition of marriage as between one man and one woman in the state Constitution.

Walker last week deemed the ballot initiative in violation of the U.S. Constitution in a case that is likely to wind its way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Attorneys for official backers of Prop. 8, ProtectMarriage, have appealed the ruling. Walker last week denied Imperial County's effort to intervene in the case, saying the county lacked sufficient interests in the matter to do so. The county, represented by the Christian legal group Advocates for Faith and Freedom, pledged to appeal that denial.

Read more: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/08/imperial-county-appeals-judges-ruling-overturning-gay-marriage-ban-prop-8.html



To bad so sad, Imperial County has no legal standing to appeal (they are not in charge of marriages for the state). Its been ruled that way already and will be again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Imperial county . . .
. . . one of the meth capitals of the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wait... is "Imperial" county why it's called the inland empire?
Or, as we called it, "that God-awful never ending blight of strip malls between 29 Palms and San Diego".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3waygeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I never really thought of that area as the Inland Empire...
to me, the IE is the area between Pomona & San Bernadino from the SB mountains south to Riverside. Of course, that's probably because my folks lived in Rancho Cucamonga for 25 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It turns out I was wrong
I thought of the IE as everything east of the coastal lowlands and south of the high desert; wiki tells me it's a lot smaller than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyr330 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. In the Shitty Central Valley. . .
Too bad it can't fall off the state into the Pacific Ocean! Wrong side of the state!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Imperial isnt in the Central Valley.
It's in the southern desert on the Mexican border.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyr330 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. OOps!
I'm always trying to pin shit on the Central Valley! Oh well. . . Thanks for the correction!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just another winger pseudo-foundation. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Do they have nothing better to do? Or to spend precious tax dollars on?
...they should be removed from office for wasting time and money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backtomn Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. But we should all know that this isn't done.
This will be appealed....it will probably be upheld by the 9th Circuit.....and, unfortunately we will have to wait to see what Justice Kennedy feels about it. On most big issues before the Court, it appears that Kennedy is going to be the "Decider-in-Chief".....a pretty screwed up system, win or lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. It might not even make it to the 9 District of Appeals - one must have standing to appeal the ruling
The proponents in the District case were granted a right to intervene because the state refused to defend the law. Standing is different and neither Yes On 8 or this county have legal standing to appeal.

See: http://calitics.com/diary/12276/prop-8-stay-standing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. SCOTUS already ruled---9-0, vacating the 9th's Yniguez v. Arizona.
Can you explain how this case differs?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC