Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Google to use ‘spy drones’ for street mapping

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 10:24 PM
Original message
Google to use ‘spy drones’ for street mapping
Source: Khaleej Times

Internet search engine giant Google has plans to use “spy drones” similar to the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) used in military operations for surveillance and bombing to prepare more accurate maps of streets across the globe.

Sven Juerss, the chief executive of Microdrones GmbH, a German firm which builds UAVs, has said that his company has already supplied Google with one aircraft and expects to provide “dozens” more in the future, The Telegraph reported Tuesday.

”The UAVs are well suited to provide more timely recording of the map service Google Earth,” Juerss told German business magazine Wirtschaft Woche.

Microdrones sells its UAVs to Merseyside Police, and it is rumoured to have previously sold them to British special forces as well, technology website, The Register, said...

Read more: http://khaleejtimes.com/Displayarticle08.asp?section=technology&xfile=data/technology/2010/August/technology_August21.xml



Big GOOGLE is watching!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Frisbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Google...
the CIA and DoD's newest subcontractor. And who know's what other governments may want to talk to Google.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Curious, do these things fly very high in the air?
It sounds like something the kids around here would shoot at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pasto76 Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. dammit, that was my thought. Except not kids, "patriots"
like that one nut who was shooting at a low flying helicopter a few years back. Claimed he thought it was al quaeda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonGlow Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. you cannot see a drone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supply Side Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. but i love the compromising pics !
i'll miss them ;( :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. 'Don't be evil' Google embracing its future as corporate overlord.
Killing Net Neutrality and now Civilians.

Rid yourselves of everything Google, Now!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can we shoot them?
Edited on Tue Aug-10-10 10:58 PM by eowyn_of_rohan
actually i don't have a gun - but this would inspire me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. How about a laser pointer against them?
That would seem more reasonable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. I'm not an expert on weaponry
thanks for the tip ;)

*** !!! HAHA JOKE!!! ***
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phil The Cat Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. Beyond the legal jeopardy
Suppose you shot down some kids toy? Or the UAV crashed and hurt or killed somebody?

Or turned out to be a small manned aircraft?

Don't forget - you will probably miss, and the bullet has to come down somewhere!

I haven't checked, but I bet the Alex Jones types are REALLY blowing a gasket and shopping for Stinger missles!

(PS I know you are joking, but without the Sarcasm tag it can be hard to tell)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. I can dream, can't I?
Edited on Wed Aug-11-10 10:56 AM by eowyn_of_rohan
So far, no law against fantasizing

I want to add... which crime is worse: Violating our Constitutional Rights or shooting down an unmanned spy drone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phil The Cat Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Either one can hurt or kill innocent people!
I don't see how flying a UAV past your house is any different than flying a manned airplane past your house!

I can see a problem if they linger on some place or someone, but the purpose seems to be to make accurate maps! Which is very important to help deliver goods and services to people! And useful to protect what we can of the environment!

Perhaps it is time to ban aerial photography? Then, how do we keep an eye on industrial sites and watch for illegal logging and other enviromental disasters?

OK, I admit it - I also like to take Virtual Vacations using Google Maps and Street View! It makes you feel so much more connected to the world outside of your neighborhood!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Montag destroyed a mechanical hound with a flamethrower
didn't hurt any people ;)

Who sent you here? I don't trust your rap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. the black helicopters really ARE coming!

alert FoxNews - they need some viewers this week

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. FWIW, this would be illegal in the U.S.
Current FAA regs require that a human pilot have visual control over any aircraft operating over populated areas. The LAPD recently got into a bit of trouble for testing drones this way...if you can't see it with your own two eyes, you can't fly it over a city.

I'm a bit surprised that Britain permits it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
19. Republicans came to the conclusion long ago that it is better to
just do something and apologize later than to ask permission and wait for the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kickysnana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. That is what they want you to believe.
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. What do you know.... bet you might think this is a UFO when it passes over, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. Uh if its announced in public its not spying

What difference does it make if there is a pilot or not.

It will be just a few years until all of the traffic helicopters are replaced with drones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheEuclideanOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. Sorry to bum everybody out
But who here really thinks that we have any inkling of privacy left? At this point, it is like a convict who is alreay going to spend his life in prison getting an extra 10 years. We are not losing any type of privacy because you can't lose something that is already taken away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. must be freaky for those with something to hide.. ... how do we deal with the
Edited on Wed Aug-11-10 01:13 AM by earcandle
fight for privacy in the face of so much crime, suspicion,
duplicity.   

hmmm,, sounds like another "fighting" industry to
prop up and take our funds. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. I agree and yet disagree
while much of our traditional idea of privacy has been eroded, there is still something there to lose. And to treat that bit as nothing actually encourages encroachment. I don't think technology can be stopped, nor do I think an apathetic public can be bothered to care about freedoms half remembered; but we must think of ourselves as guardians and not be easily swayed into discouragement by recent developments. The ideal of privacy should not be so easily discouraged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. + 1000
"freedoms half remembered..." so sad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phil The Cat Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Outside - How CAN there be privacy?
Airplanes have been flying since 1903! And varous picture taking satellites (spy, weather, mapping, etc) since the early 1960s!

Yes, the technology is getting better, but the principal is the same! If it is open to the sky, it is open to the world!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Not just better think of TB resolution in real-time, well don't say the Iraq war was for nothing
much of the imaging technology we are looking at was pioneered there. Now the private contractors want to cash in on the advances they made for the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
15. Half Life 2- City Scanners






Players of Half-Life 2 are familiar with the City Scanners, small autonomous surveillance drones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC