Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson Agrees to Repay Scholarship Money

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 10:40 AM
Original message
Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson Agrees to Repay Scholarship Money
Source: Politics Daily

Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Texas), who said she "unknowingly" broke Congressional Black Caucus Foundation rules by awarding thousands of dollars in scholarship money to four relatives and a top aide's two children, will repay the money, the New York Times reports.

Members of the Black Caucus are given $10,000 every year to award scholarships. They must follow certain rules in awarding the privately raised money, including a requirement that winners not be related to caucus members nor live or study in the lawmaker's district. According to the Dallas Morning News, Johnson provided 23 scholarships totaling $25,000 to two of her grandsons, two of her great-nephews and to an aide's son and daughter, all between 2005 and 2009.

At first the Dallas lawmaker denied violating the anti-nepotism regulation, but later said in a statement she made a mistake and would work with the foundation to "rectify the financial situation," The Associated Press reported. On Tuesday, Johnson's press secretary, Dena Craig, said the nine-term congresswoman was recovering from surgery and would not be able to comment.

Rep. Donald Payne, (D-N.J.), who chairs the foundation, denounced the "self-dealing" move and vowed to prevent further violations of the scholarship rules.

Read more: http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/09/01/rep-eddie-bernice-johnson-agrees-to-repay-scholarship-money/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lightning Count Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. I like where she said that she didn't consider her grandkids to be relatives.
Thanks grandma!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. No kidding..she said she "thought" she recognized
their names on the award list.
Keep in mind that the kids signed the paperwork that specifically said that they were not relatives of anyone involved with awarding the money. One of them has been getting the money for 3 years.

Imagine being a kid or parent IN her district...she said outright that she didn't think or was not sure that there were kids "worthy" of the award money.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcks Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. this
"unknowingly" is suppose to pass the smell test, it would not if it was Republican why should it for Johnson?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. it doesn't pass the small test. it's shameful and
i hope she's punished accordingly.

and republicans would get away with it. If you can be a diaper-wearing, hooker loving republicon, and still remain in office, i think a repuke would have no problem side-stepping this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Republicans would get away with it, whether or not it passed a smell test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Do you like Western movies? I have a very good one to recommend you. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wouldn't a bit of common decency
dictate that you shouldn't show favoritism to your relatives and friends with other peoples' money??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. And she's a Dem. Embarassing.
I hope the Dems do punishing her for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Do Congressional Dems have jurisdiction to punish her for violating the rules of a private charity?
Even if she returns the money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hangingon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. I am afraid she didn't say she would repay...
According to the Dallas News story she said, "would work with the foundation to "rectify the financial situation,". Rectify the situation does not mean repay. Time for her to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. She still denies knowingly steering the money? What a coward.
Edited on Wed Sep-01-10 12:07 PM by alp227
She joins in her fellow corrupt Dems Maxine Waters and Charlie Rangel.

According to the NY Times elections page, Johnson's district (TX-30) is majority black and Hispanic. (a combined 80%) Johnson is the first and only representative of TX-30, which was created following the 1990 Census, and she's been elected every election from '92-'08. How much will this scholarship scandal affect her in a district with a majority of voters likely to vote left-wing? And when in the past, Johnson has won at least 70% of the vote? (74% in 2002, 93% in 2004 without a Republican opponent, 80% in 2006, and 82% in 2008)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HoraceX Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Hilarious
Nothing burns the teabaggers more than a story like this. She cold keep doing things like this and never have to worry about an election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawnKorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. And I hope Representative Johnson wins re-election along with Representatives Waters and Rangel
In case people are not paying attention, we are in for a stiff fight for the House of Representatives this year, and we need every single seat we can get to be filled by a Democrat. This is where we will win or lose the fight here, folks. The committee chairmanships are too valuable to let the Republicans take over.

If the Republicans take over the House, they will waste valuable time, money, and effort conducting 'hearings' on the way we Democrats have been running the country. Nothing will get done. Worse yet, the Republicans will attempt to undo legislation we worked hard to pass.

The Republicans have no intention of fixing any of the problems in the Health Care Bill. Rather than having a Democratic Congress correcting decencies in the bill, the Republicans will be working to destroy it. We can't let that happen.

It will be much easier to defeat the Republicans if we hold onto Representative Johnson's seat than if we let some Republican take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. It is humorous...Repugs are stealing the Treasury, swindling everyone . . .
and we have a Rep. who gets CAUGHT for giving scholarships to relatives!!

Did she think no one would be looking???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Croquist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Thanks for taking the moral high ground
None of these 3 districts will go Republican.

In the last 7 elections Rangel has gotten 94%, 94%, 91%, 89%, 92%, 93% and 91% of the vote. He has a primary however on 09/14 and I hope he gets his ass booted but it's not likely.

In her 8 elections Waters has gotten 84%, 81%, 78%, 87%, 89%, 86%, 78% and 83% of the vote.

In her 3 elections Johnson has gotten 82%, 80% and 93% of the vote.

So what we will end up with is three criminals representing their districts in congress and you are happy. What does that say about their districts, their party and you?

I hope all three of them get censured at the least. What scares me the most is how many representatives will vote against censure. That will be an indication of more rot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawnKorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. This country has a disease. We have to cure the disease first, then work on getting healthy
The Republicans are the disease and they must be defeated. Crushing the Republicans requires as many seats held by Democrats as possible. When the Republicans are regulated to the back burner of influence in Congress, then we take up the cause of building even greater standing with the American people.

A questionable Democrat is considerably more valuable than any Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. That attitude reminds me why Louisiana was a swamp of corruption for decades
Lawnkorn, no Republicans probably have a chance in that district. But how about some Dem new blood, somebody who has more integrity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AC_Mem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. "Unknowingly" (air quotes)
Even though this was done 4-5 years ago, it is wrong and needs to be handled. I'm a strong progressive democrat, but right is right and wrong is wrong and the corruption has to stop on both sides.

I'm hopeful that the more transparent we are becoming the better behaved the politicians are going to have to be. Especially the Democrats, because we are trying to lead the way and are currently in power, although some would debate how much of our power we are using currently...

I wish November would just get over with already, so we can pick up the pieces and work to move this country back into prosperity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. She didn't "know" the money was going to her relatives?
They just happened to be passing by when she threw the money out a window--yeah, that's the ticket!

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. hmmmmm.......!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm really surprised at the comments
no one is giving her a free pass like others have done with Democrats like Waters and Rangel


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Just heard Johnson interviewed by Anderson Cooper
I just listened to Johnson interviewed by Anderson Cooper. The woman has no ethical compass. In that she is like so many public officials who have exploited the system. I'm sure many do it less blatantly and don't get caught. But this kind of lawbreaking should not be given a pass.

With nine terms in Congress, it's likely Johnson knew the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. She has to go. Whether she paid the money back or not makes no difference
to the kids who would have gotten that money had she not directed to her own relatives.

Sorry, Rep Johnson, but you got to go.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC