about this story.
For instance, how come, if you Google "New York Slimes" (oops, I mean "New York Times") and "La Macarena," you only come up with articles about tourism?
Yet, the New York Slimes has plenty of newsspace to print so-called reporter Simon Romero's electioneering for Venezuela's rightwing opposition in the upcoming National Assembly elections: "Venezuela, More Violent Than Iraq."
Odd.
The Colombian military's mass grave has been under investigation since at least January, after children in the La Macarena area got sick from the drinking water, because it was being polluted by the decaying bodies of the Colombian military's mass grave. Here is the first web site where I happened upon this story, which has links to news stories as well as to the Pentagon/USAID-designed "pacification" plan for La Macarena, which is called an "Integrated Action framework":
Army mass grave in La Macarena
http://www.cipcol.org/?p=1303Additional stories:
The UK military connection
http://www.tribunemagazine.co.uk/2010/02/04/silence-on-british-army-link-to-colombian-mass-grave/U.S. and Colombia Cover Up Atrocities Through Mass Graves, by Dan Kovalik 4/1/10
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-kovalik/us-colombia-cover-up-atro_b_521402.htmlColombia: Mass Grave Discovered In La Macarena
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO1005/S00001.htm-----------------------------------------------------------------------
There are several very important questions that need to be answered about this grave site, including the question raised in this non-U.S. media conglomerate story (the OP)--who these 446 victims are.
The initial estimate was up to 2,000 bodies. A British investigator described it as a "horrifying sea of bodies." So, if the UN human rights commission "found 'omissions in the care and handling' of the bodies," the question is, were the other estimated 1,500 bodies identified satisfactorily? Who were they? How did they die? What happened to their bodies? Was the initial estimate wrong? Has the Colombian military/government 'disappeared' some of the bodies?
Local people say the bodies in this grave are local 'disappeared' community activists and members. Are these deaths, whether 446 or 2000, the result of the U.S. "Integrated Action" plan for La Macarena? And, if so, "integrated" in what way? Was it more than the U.S. providing the bullets, the guns, the helicopters, the soldiers' salaries, uniforms, helmets and meal tickets, the fuel, the high tech surveillance and all the paraphernalia for a military operation against Colombian citizens? Or were U.S. military 'advisors' or U.S. military 'contractors' directly involved? Was Blackwater involved (which was just "fined" by the State Department for "unauthorized" "trainings" of Colombians for use in Iraq and Afghanistan, under contract to the State Department)?
Why did Bushwhack ambassador William Brownfield need SIGNED "total diplomatic immunity" for all U.S. soldiers and all U.S. military 'contractors' in Colombia--arranged in SECRET negotiations, last year?
Pentagon and Colombian promoters of the U.S./Colombian military agreement--signed last year after secret negotiations--claimed that the agreement merely ratified existing arrangements. If so, why did they need to get these "existing arrangements" SIGNED by the outgoing president, and why were the negotiations kept SECRET from the Colombian legislature, the Colombian courts, the Colombian people, all the other leaders of Latin America (who didn't even get a heads up when it was finally announced), and--not unimportantly--kept secret from the American people (--an agreement that, overall, committed the U.S. military to a massive increase in the U.S. military presence in Colombia, including U.S. military use of at least SEVEN more U.S. military bases in Colombia, and U.S. military use of all civilian infrastructure--airports, harbors, etc.--in Colombia, including such perks as paying no road tolls)?
I smell a coverup in the State Department's contention that Blackwater's illegal "trainings" in Colombia were "unauthorized." I smell a coverup in this secretly negotiated and signed "total diplomatic immunity" for all U.S. military personnel including 'contractors" in Colombia. And I smell the stench of a coverup in these many dead bodies in La Macarena.
My suspicion: The Bushwhacks encouraged the "false positives" policy (rewards to Colombian soldiers for upping their "body counts"), encouraged the general atmosphere of lawlessness, "extrajudicial" murder and mayhem in Colombia, and authorized "turkey shoots" of Colombian civilians as "practice" for their assassins in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The "Integrated Action framework" laid out in a document linked at the CIPCOL site is very similar to the "pacification" programs that we are currently getting hints of in reports from Afghanistan--that is, the targeting of local community leaders for assassination, the installation of puppet leaders friendly to the U.S.-installed national government, and leaving behind a residual police/military force to remind local people of the price for opposing the U.S.-friendly government and moving on to the next "pacification" area, while the USAID flies U.S. operatives into the "pacified" area, in helicopters, to set up and secure the local puppet government.
In Colombia, in areas where the FARC guerrillas were operating (in Colombia's 40+ year civil war with leftist guerrillas), all opposers of the Uribe government were considered to be "terrorists"--including trade unionists, teachers, community activists of various kinds, human rights workers, political leftists, peasant farmers and others. Uribe said so in public statements. All who opposed him were "terrorists." Amnesty International attributed about half of the murders of trade unionists in Colombia to the Colombian military itself (and most of the others to their rightwing paramilitary death squads). So it is not outside the realm of possibility--and, indeed, it seems to be more and more likely--that the U.S./Bushwhacks were using Colombia as a "practice" area, to try out various ways to subdue the populations of Iraq and Afghanistan and to "train" operatives for the more horrendous aspects of their conquests.
Could this be why the mass grave in La Macarena has not been reported on by the New York Slimes and all their brethren in the corporate/war profiteer-run news media in the U.S.? "We need to look forward not backward" when it comes to Bush Junta war crimes?
It's bad enough that our money has been used to arm these killers in Colombia, and to impose state terror on the entire peasant population, five MILLION of whom have been driven from their lands by the Colombian military. But what ELSE has the U.S. government been doing in our name in Colombia?
Uribe, by the way, has been honored by the Obama administration with a prestigious appointment to an international legal committee (investigating Israel's firing on aid boats), and by Georgetown University, where he will be "lecturing" students on international relations. And will he tell them that everyone who opposes fascist government is a "terrorist"? And will they write that down in their notes, for future reference when they get their internships at the State Department?
:puke:
-------------------
Note on the term "mass grave": The bodies were individually buried with grave markers with dates (2002 through 2009) but no names. They weren't all thrown into one pit. That was clear from the earliest reports. So, for the UN commission to say that they "found no evidence" of a "common grave" is redundant. I have not seen any evidence of a claim that there was, and I don't know why they make this point. Is it a P.R. sop to the Colombian government? I'm going to continue using the term "mass grave," because that's what it is, if there are at least 446 unidentified bodies in it.