Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One quarter of Lockheed executives take buyout offer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
mike r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 01:05 PM
Original message
One quarter of Lockheed executives take buyout offer
Source: Washington Post

Bethesda-based contracting giant Lockheed Martin announced Wednesday that more than 600 executives have taken the company up on an early-exit program that provides financial incentives in exchange for leaving.

The total represents about 25 percent of all company executives and follows Lockheed's move to cut its workforce nationally by about 10,000 since the beginning of last year...

The move is one of many by Lockheed as well as other defense contractors to cut spending in anticipation of a reduced Pentagon budget.

Boeing announced Tuesday it is consolidating its military aircraft business from six divisions into four as of Oct. 1. As a result, the company said, it will reduce its workforce, starting with about 10 percent of its executive positions.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/08/AR2010090804316.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. i expect a case for the invasion of Iran will be manufactured by next week...
these clowns have cashed in long enough...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Blue_Tires, I've been watching the build-up too. We are poised.
It's really scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. 600 Executives is only 1/4 of the total?
If they have more than 60, they are feather-bedding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. 106,000 employees
That leaves them about 1800 people, director and above, in a company of about 106,000 employees. Puts management at about 1.8%. Not particularly huge, when you realize what directors are. They needed this down sizing, and there may be more soon. Their customer is broke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. its not that the DOD is broke
its more that their has been extreme cost growth to many major programs. the F-35 has seen cost estimates go from 50 million to 96 million per plane; they know if that price doesnt go down closer to 50 million that the u.s. will cancel many planned orders.

But again, i can't blame lockmart, Nrthgrmn, beoing etc.. totally- its also the DOD requirements that caused this problem. Since the end of the cold war the U.S. has gone from procuring "great equipment" to procuring "gold plated" equipmen; i.e. all-in-one super weapons. These systems tend to take years to design and are so complicated that the price goes through the roof.

the "MIC" doesnt work the way many people think it does; it doesnt always start at the contractor level but at the government level- govt puts out a proposal for some swiss army knife of a plane and the contractors attempts to comply. Then the govt is surprised that such plane is so expensive, but it took so long to develop that their is no other alternative so the govt is forced to buy it or lose the capability completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Contracting is complicated
The companies do alot of lobbying, but in the end the DoD is at fault for alot of this. Careers are made on acquisition programs. That's effectively a "conflict of interest".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. very true
as much as i dislike gates for being strategically inept, he is right when it comes to acquisition reform
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Not only the DOD. Congress and the President are supposed to be
Edited on Thu Sep-09-10 11:52 AM by No Elephants
watching the taxpayers' collective back. Probably Sec. of Defense, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Not sure what you're saying. In a corporation, no officer is above the board of directors.
They answer only to the shareholders, if anyone, and even more rarely, to the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. That's not the kind of directors they mean
there are directors, and they are the lowest form of employees that have the authority to obligate the corporation to contracts. Vice Presidents are above them. Various different "presidents" are above those and there are a few CEO, CFO, and some other "C's". A large number of the 600 were assuredly directors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. I think future downsizing will come as contracts aren't renewed
Stevens has been talking about stream lining LM for months now, before this voluntary retirement was announced. At least his version of stream lining isn't just chop a bunch of people off at the bottom, he was also successful in getting directors, VP, and above to leave too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nice for the executives... wonder what the buyout terms were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilt the stilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. it's not as great as it looks
For the "middle managers" who are in their fifties it will be hard to ever find another job. That is the death knell. No real discernible skills. I met a guy who took a package from AT&t and he never found another job. It's really fools gold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. True, but plenty of workers in their 50's get fired with no buyout at all.
Edited on Thu Sep-09-10 11:56 AM by No Elephants
When unemployment and savings run out before OASDI kicks in, ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilt the stilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I completely agree
being in your fifties and being a middle manager is basically dead man walking. If your in your fifties and you are in a corporation you better be in a revenue producing position(sales).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. More companies need to do this
Most management doesn't do anything except cash checks and stand in the way of getting actual work done. They spend their time at sporting events on the company dime, "entertaining clients" (read: haute cuisine meals, strip clubs and drinks on the company dime, tax deductible, or course), and attending useless seminars to learn the latest corporate jargon and phony-baloney theory at hoity-toity destinations.

You could fire 90% of top management in the US, and productivity would go way up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Precisely
You said it right!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Right on. When RIFs are needed, start at the top. Good for Lockheed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. These 600 are the hardcore republicans of the corporation - Who love war & weapons for profit and
Edited on Thu Sep-09-10 01:45 PM by GreenTea
big government! You know OUR taxes for big government contracts for the corporations but republicans preach small government for the people, workers & small businesses and their social needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
20. I will never feel sorry for those who made their living off the backs of the innocent dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawnKorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
21. Stand by for a marked increase in GOP campaign managers and lobbyists for right wing corporations
These 600 executives won't let their skills at lying, manipulation, and exploitation go to waste. They will be at the forefront in the mix advancing the party of lies, manipulation, and exploitation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC