Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Soldiers With Brain Trauma Denied Purple Hearts, Adding Insult to Injury

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 09:57 AM
Original message
Soldiers With Brain Trauma Denied Purple Hearts, Adding Insult to Injury
Source: ProPublica

Soldiers With Brain Trauma Denied Purple Hearts, Adding Insult to Injury
by T. Christian Miller, ProPublica, and Daniel Zwerdling, NPR Yesterday, 10:05 p.m.


The U.S. Army honors soldiers wounded or killed in combat with the Purple Heart, a powerful symbol designed to recognize their sacrifice and service.

Yet Army commanders have routinely denied Purple Hearts to soldiers who have sustained concussions in Iraq, despite regulations that make such wounds eligible for the medal, an investigation by NPR and ProPublica has found.

Soldiers have had to battle for months and sometimes years to prove that these wounds <1>, also called mild traumatic brain injuries, merit the honor, our reporting showed. Commanders turned down some soldiers despite well-documented blast wounds that wrenched their minds, altered their lives and wracked their families.

................

The denials of Purple Hearts reflect a broader skepticism within the military over the severity of mild traumatic brain injury, often described as one of the signature wounds of the conflicts, according to interviews, documents and internal e-mails obtained by NPR and ProPublica.

Read more: http://www.propublica.org/article/soldiers-with-brain-trauma-denied-purple-hearts-adding-insult-to-injury
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pasto76 Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. interesting
I can see the point of view for wanting to deny these awards. It is highly subjective and revolves around a romanticized version of war at best.

from wiki:

"A "wound" is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force or agent sustained under one or more of the conditions listed above. A physical lesion is not required; however, the wound for which the award is made must have required treatment by a medical officer and records of medical treatment for wounds or injuries received in action must have been made a matter of official record. When contemplating an award of this decoration, the key issue that commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury. The fact that the proposed recipient was participating in direct or indirect combat operations is a necessary prerequisite, but is not sole justification for award. Contrary to popular myth, the Purple Heart is not awarded for non-combative injuries."

To deny this award - the only citation not RECOMMENDED, but earned by meeting the criteria, is literally saying to troops, "hey I know your hmmwv just rolled into a canal when that IED went off, but Jones here had his arm turned into hamburger, I dont see anything wrong with you" - as the troop stands there wondering which of the eight commanders he sees is actually the one talking.

Also a purple heart goes a long way to getting disability awards, which we all know, BushCo made damned sure the whole machine knew that disability for TBI and PTSD were not approved. I have no evidence to that point, just a long time in the army and seeing how it works. Yeah, total bullshit.

sgt pasto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I like posting here, but I'll risk a tombstone over this: Go shit in your hat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Too late to edit, but I may have misunderstood your post. I still am not sure what
you are advocating. So...

If you are for brain-damaged troops getting a purple heart, profound apologies for my prior post. If you are against their getting it, though, my prior post stands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Playing like combat-related brain injuries are not injuries. Unbefuckingly unbelievable, but this
delusion is perhaps no more delusional than the entire Afgan-Iraqi experience wherein almost an entire nation has deluded itself it its illusory reichousness. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. sickening. The way these so-called patriots treat our soldiers is heartbreaking
Edited on Thu Sep-09-10 12:29 PM by librechik
why should I be surprised, though? The PTB who deny our soldiers want them there getting shot at for profit and politics in the first place. They are cruel and ignorant low lifes, hardly human IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. I heard that story on NPR this morning. Thanks for posting it.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fuck that horseshit.

Cheap-ass conservative blockheads.





PAY FOR OUR TROOPS, YO

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Support the Troops n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. my take is.... if they get the medal...then that proves they were
injured in battle...without it and no obvious physical wounds...somehow the government saves $$$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is disgusting!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC