Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Impeachment Trial Begins for Lousiana Judge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 10:10 AM
Original message
Impeachment Trial Begins for Lousiana Judge
Source: NY Times

A special Senate committee this morning begins deliberating corruption charges against Judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr. It could set a precedent on whether a judge can be removed for conduct that occurred before he joined the bench.

The House voted unanimously in March to impeach Judge Porteous, a New Orleans federal district judge appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994. He is accused of accepting bribes while he was a Louisiana state judge in Jefferson Parish, and of lying to the Senate and the Federal Bureau of Investigation during the vetting process.

Judge Porteous has been suspended with pay since 2008, when a judicial ethics panel first recommended his impeachment. If convicted, he would become the eighth federal judge impeached and removed by Congress. A two-thirds vote in the Senate is required to convict.

A bipartisan, 12-member panel of senators headed by Claire McCaskill, Democrat of Missouri, will conduct the trial. Five House members serve as “managers,” or prosecutors: Representatives Adam Schiff, Democrat of California; Bob Goodlatte, Republican of Virginia; Zoe Lofgren, Democrat of California; Hank Johnson, Democrat of Georgia; and Jim Sensenbrenner, Republican of Wisconsin.

Read more: http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/13/impeachment-trial-begins-for-lousiana-judge/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. 11 years after the Clinton impeachment, one of Clinton's appointees is on trial
Interesting. Wikipedia's article about the judge explains why (and neither this article nor the New Orleans Times-Picayune article linked explain):

On June 18, 2008 the Judicial Conference of the United States transmitted a certificate<8> to the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives expressing the Conference's determination that consideration of impeachment of Porteous might be warranted.<8> The certificate stated that there was substantial evidence that Porteous "repeatedly committed perjury by signing false financial disclosure forms under oath,"<9> thus concealing "cash and things of value that he solicited and received from lawyers appearing in litigation before him."<9>


Is perjury a value spread among Clinton and his crew? Just askin'.

Now when is that Torture Memo author Jay Bybee (a Bush Jr. appointee) gonna be impeached?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Clinton is no idol of mine, but smearing him with this is quite a stretch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What? I thought I put tags around that supposed "smear"
regarding perjury. it's supposed to be openbracket rightwingtalkingpoint closedbracket. Seems that anything within brackets never displays on DU. Grr!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. If lying to Congress is grounds for impeachment, what about Alito and Roberts
as they testified under oath about the "value of precedent" before they swept away about 100 years of precedent so as to allow corporations, in one more step toward fascism, unlimited power to corrupt the political process with money?

And what about their affiliation with The Federalist Society, and its agenda driven membership, clearly in violation of the Judicial Code of Ethics prohibiting federal judges from engaging in activities detracting in appearance from impartiality, IMHO.

Why aren't we banging the impeachment drum against these political hacks IMHO, Alito and Roberts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC