Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Considers Naming Warren 'Interim' CFPB Head

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 05:53 PM
Original message
White House Considers Naming Warren 'Interim' CFPB Head
Source: American Banker

White House Considers Naming Warren 'Interim' CFPB Head

American Banker | Tuesday, September 14, 2010

By Cheyenne Hopkins

WASHINGTON — The White House is considering appointing Elizabeth Warren as interim head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, bypassing a likely Senate confirmation battle, according to sources.

Under the Dodd-Frank regulatory reform law signed July 21, the Treasury Department has the power to appoint a temporary head of the new agency until a permanent one is nominated and confirmed.

By naming Warren interim head, the White House would sidestep — for now — a likely fight over her nomination. Obama can still choose to formally nominate Warren sometime next year, or select another candidate if she becomes too polarizing.

Warren supporters are urging the White House to make the appointment quickly, which would give the Harvard professor time and authority to get the new agency running.

Read more: http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/175_176/elizabeth-warren-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-1025463-1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because the battle will be easier next year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kweli4Real Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
41. No ...
But this move allows her to start ASAP without the confirmation battles distracting from Democratic candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepBlueC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. and the sooner the better!
She is a very well-spoken and persuasive advocate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. or select another candidate if she becomes too polarizing
Translation:
If she does the job, but the poor bankers get upset as a result, she's history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
40. Alternate translation: if Glenn Beck mentions her too often.
Holy crap, can this president ever do anything all the way? Does there always have to be some deflating compromise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kweli4Real Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
42. No ...
Don't be so negative ...

I think a better translation would be "Don't worry, I'm just gonna put the head in", when anyone that has been a teenager and in the backseat of a car knows, that once she's in ... she's in for the duration.

I like the move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. "...if she becomes too polarizing."
Treasury, the Fed and their handlers over at Goldman Sachs don't want her. Of course she's going to be polarizing - unless she does nothing to reign them in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Interim? Oy - of course. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. OK with me; Bureau itself doesn't exist yet; EVERYTHING's interim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. CONTACT the White House here...and tell them to make her permanent.
Contact the White House here:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The White House CAN'T "make her permanent"
The Senate would STILL have to confirm her. And since Reid is useless, she'll never get scheduled for a hearing, committee vote, and finally full floor vote any time soon.

By doing it this way, she starts immediately upon appointment (like a recess appointment) until the Senate gets around to it. And if you believe the RW-owned M$M, McConnell is poised to take over and would ditch her in less than a fraction of a second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. So?
Edited on Mon Sep-13-10 06:31 PM by Amonester
How about The Obama Administration (if Obama is it's boss...) let mcCONnHell just TRY to ditch her in less than a fraction of a second anyway??

oh. we. can't. have. the. boss. be. all. the. boss. he. could. be.

let. his. own. appointed. GOPer. advi$or$. convince. him. not. to. ever. think. of. 'offending'. mcCONnHELL. for. G. sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Don't understand the system, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Because the system 'works' so well.
Don't. Even. Try. To. Suggest. It. Needs. Change.

That. Could. Offend. The. Tiny. Minority. Who. Profit. Obscenely. From. It.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. It doesn't work well,
but we should not kick it in those instances where there is a way around. FOOLISH to do otherwise, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
32. Have you ever heard about the tricameral gov't?
The ignorance of how the gov't works is breath-taking on DU. :banghead:

News flash - There is no dictatorship here in the U.S. although many times it seemed like it under the rethuglicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Right; that's the was it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. Why can't she be nominated *and* appointed as a temp?
Are they serious about appointing her or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #25
33. I expect that this is what will probably happen. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
34. You're right.
This is President's only choice at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. You don't want to hurt bankers' feelings
Gotta be real careful...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. More
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. "See, I Really Really Wanted Elizabeth, but the Nasty Senate Wouldn't Confirm Her"
Sure he does. Right after a good case of hemorrhoids.

The tap dancing is really getting to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pmorlan1 Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. Bait and Switch Again
Appoint her as the "temporary" head before the election and then remove her after the election. Great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. I agree get her in there to organize the dept. not enough time left for a
protracted battle at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. Wonder how long it took Rahm to think that up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. YEAH! HURRY UP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. Just one question
How long can she stay as the "interm" head of the bureau before he has to nominate someone?

If there is no dead line, then who cares, she could stay on as long as he is in office, couldn't she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. UPDATE!!!!!!!!The appointment may be made on Sept. 15 or 16
Obama to Name Warren as Interim Consumer Agency Head
September 13, 2010, 9:37 PM EDT

By Hans Nichols

(Updates with details on appointment beginning in fourth paragraph, earlier Obama comments from seventh.)

Sept. 13 (Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama plans to appoint Elizabeth Warren as the interim head of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau as early as this week, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The consumer bureau is one of the biggest regulatory consequences of a Wall Street overhaul Obama signed into law in July. The bureau will have a $400 million budget and the power to impose federal rules on mortgages, credit cards, layaway plans and other consumer credit products.

Warren, a Harvard law professor and chairman of the congressional panel overseeing the Troubled Asset Relief Program, is the favored candidate for the agency post among consumer advocates. She is credited with conceiving the new agency and is a consistent critic of Wall Street, which she has said bears responsibility for the financial collapse.

The appointment may be made on Sept. 15 or 16, said the person, who requested anonymity. The final decision on temporarily installing Warren hasn’t yet been made, said another person familiar with the matter.

more:
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-09-13/obama-to-name-warren-as-interim-consumer-agency-head.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Very, very exciting news!
I have always believed Ms. Warren would be the appointee as she is the BEST qualified person for the job and I am glad my belief has proven valid.

Thanks for the update!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwillnevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
26. Is this what's known as
sweating it out? Holy mackeral. But "interim" could be okay I think. Elizabeth already knows what has to be done and has a game plan. She's also aware of the criminality in the entire financial sector. Let her get going, showing her stuff, and she'll make it through to "permanent." We gotta believe, but to me this also signals Dems have to hold onto as many seats in the midterms as they possibly can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
27. If this is true, Obama deserves full praise for this.
From what I've seen, the soonest an "interim" head of the Bureau may have to leave is summer of 2012, and even that time-frame doesn't appear definite.

I'm all for criticism of Obama when appropriate, but if this story is true, I can't imagine any legitimate reason why anyone here would be upset with Obama about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. thanks for this post! she will do whatever she's supposed to do in that job - and that's great, and
I just hope they don't get in her way, she's got plenty to do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
28. INTERIM?
What the gutless fuck is this about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. kick
you know aquart, you just get it don't you?

I needed to read a post like this today.

Thanks you. :thumbsup:

"what the gutless fuck is this about?" I'm stealing that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtuck004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
29. No. Have the fight NOW, and make her permanent. In or out.
Edited on Mon Sep-13-10 10:49 PM by jtuck004
Besides, I want to see who is on our side.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freebrew Donating Member (478 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
43. Well, it's not Chris Dodd....
he has already threatened to cut the funding for the agency.


ASSHAT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtuck004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
31. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
35. When you can't win head on then flank them or come up the rear
There's lots and lots of way to skin a cat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
36. Why must the administration
constantly placate the party of 'no?' I'm so tired of it.

Name her and be PROUD of her. She's the best person for the job, damn it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
37. Oh, FFS -- JUST DO IT, DAMN IT. Quit the damn dithering.
This is NOT a classroom exercise, Mr. Obama. This is not a rhetorical moment.

It is real life and it's time to fucking DO SOMETHING. Grow a pair. Make the appointment and see what happens. You might be pleasantly surprised!

I mean, come on. What's the worst that can happen? A floor fight in the Senate? Is that the absolute worst?

Or is the worst that can happen some personal slight, some emotional ouchie that needs a special band-aid?

This country is DYING, Mr. Obama. DYING by inches, by a thousand, a million, a billion, a trillion tiny cuts. While you dither over a recess appointment, how many people will lose their homes? Their jobs? Their dignity?

Make the goddess damned appointment, sir, and have done with it.



Tansy Gold, NTY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
38. Nominate her and let them attack. What are they going to say?

She's too smart? Too much integrity? This is exactly the KIND of fight the WH ought to pick with the Republicans. Put them in the position, again and again, of defending the rich and the banks and the corporations against consumers, i.e., voters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
45. I'm waiting to see how this plays out.
I understand that this new Agency will live in the opaque bowels of the secretive FED.
It is very possible that Warren could be forbidden to speak publicly about anything that happens under the aegis of The FED.
We could never see or hear from her again.

It seems insane to me that a Consumer Protection Agency would be placed INSIDE one of the most secretive and unaccountable agencies the USA has ever known.
We get more information out of the CIA than from the Black Hole of The FED.

...but what do I know? :shrug:


Oh, I do know that Timmie Geithner has been over there (The FED) setting up everything
(burying skeletons, locking doors, shredding files, installing trap doors, greasing poles, and spreading bread crumbs to Dead Ends) so that the transition will be easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
46. "Obama can still choose to formally nominate Warren sometime next year,
or select another candidate if she becomes too polarizing."

My.... "too polarizing"! Mustn't have that. What would Wall Street have to say about it....!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC