Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rahm Likely to Leave White House This Week

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:09 PM
Original message
Rahm Likely to Leave White House This Week
Edited on Mon Sep-27-10 09:11 PM by brooklynite
Source: ABC NEWS

Although no final decision has been made because of family considerations, ABC News has learned that White House officials are preparing for White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel to announce on Friday – as Congress adjourns for recess -- that he is leaving his post at the White House to explore a run for mayor of Chicago. White House officials expect that President Obama will also name an interim chief of staff, perhaps senior adviser Pete Rouse, at the announcement. Sources close to Emanuel cautioned that he has yet to pull that last trigger on the decision.

Emanuel’s likely departure is not a surprise, his mayoral aspirations well known. Longtime Chicago mayor Richard M. Daly’s announcement earlier this month that he would not seek reelection created the opportunity that Emanuel has long been looking for, the former Chicagoan never coy about his desire to head the proverbial City with Shoulders.

"One day I would like to run for mayor of the city of Chicago.... That's always been an aspiration of mine even when I was in the House of Representatives,” Emanuel said in April to Bloomberg’s Charlie Rose.


Read more: http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/09/rahm-likely-to-leave-white-house-this-week.html



While a lot of people here look down on Rahm's performance as Chief of Staff, his performance as head of DCC helped win us the House. One of best things he could do is spend the next month working to save the Democratic majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SugarShack Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oddios....DINO Breeder!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
55. Did You Mean Adios? or Odious?
Either one is appropriate....I'm just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #55
80. !Adios odioso!
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disillusioned73 Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #80
119. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #55
142. Good Bye to the DLC Corporate Boot Lick
Hey Chicago get ready to be Sodomized
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. What will DU do..
...if he goes, and nothing changes?

Then whom do we blame?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well.....
Ya there;'s that........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:18 PM
Original message
Obama. Buck stops at the top. n/t
J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
39. Look . . . Obama picked DLC/Rahm -- and the pro-corporate team ....
it's unlikely that anything will change ---

Rahm is corporate but I doubt he was Obama's Svengali?

Did the Wall Street gang and Goldman Sacks hypnotize Obama?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #39
126. Good points ! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
78. We'd all like to see a Progressive picked to be COS but anyone who still
thinks that may happen is delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
82. Wow...
You know this to be true? Who is the "we"?

I would hope there are more steps to a successful 2nd administration than getting rid of Summers and Emanuel. Please give people more credit than that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
124. He is our last bastion of blamage
We may actually have to start taking it to where the buck is supposed to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
138. Who we should have been blaming from the beginning. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't let the door hit ya
Where the good Lord split ya. Good riddance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. I agree with that last sentence.
As rotten as he is, it doesn't look good to leave before the mid-terms (especially so soon after the econ. team). It will look like the rats deserting the ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kag Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
48. I seriously disagree.
Edited on Tue Sep-28-10 01:20 AM by kag
This could be the kick in the ass a bunch of fence sitting dems need to get there butts to the pols.

Good riddance, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #48
92. Please see Reply ##s 89 and 91. Any Dem well-informed enough to know
the Chief of Staff is Rahm Emmanuel and also to know Rahm's track reicord is also not likely to be swayed simply bc Rahm has always wanted to be Mayor of Chicago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
57. Nah, it's entirely Apro'pos. The DLC is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #57
88. We wish, but I doubt DLC is done. Maybe the organization per se is waning, but its philosophy,
principles, methods, etc. are pandemic, at least at the national level and, I fear, will be for a very long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #57
131. Far from it...
... if you look at the make up of the current administration, the DLC is pretty much alive, kicking, and in charge of things.

Rahm is not stepping down because of pressure regarding his piss poor performance, he is simply moving on to run for mayor in Chicago.


However, what will be interesting is to see who Obama picks to replace Rahm Emmanuel, it could be a defining moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Give me a break. Rahm did everything he could to lick corporation/Repuke boots.
This asshole's departure is the best thing that I've heard out of the Obama administration in two years! I may actually vote in Nov. now that there's evidence that a major DLCer is out at the top!

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pam4water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
38. So true!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
74. lick corporation/Repuke boots.
He did more than lick their boots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Be still, my heart...
Edited on Mon Sep-27-10 09:19 PM by rocktivity
Talk about energizing Obama's base!

:eyes:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Damn straight! I'm psyched and energized to vote! n/t
J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
91. Only if Obama's base is very ill-informed. Rahm's only the tip of the iceberg. See also Reply 92.
Edited on Tue Sep-28-10 11:21 AM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yeahyeah Donating Member (741 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oops,then it turns out to have been Obama all along...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
41. ...and we have another two years more of the pro-corporate agenda ...!!
Edited on Tue Sep-28-10 12:38 AM by defendandprotect


And -- rather -- it was Howard Dean who brought in the Democratic victories!

And his 50 state plan --

Democrats had dropped so many competititions that they were simply throwing in the towel!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #41
94. In terms of DNC heads, Kaine is no Dean, either. Even as loyal a Dem as Jon Stewart looked
so angry and nauseous when he interviewed Kaine, I worried Jon might throw up before the interview ended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #94
105. Obama has been following the GOP pattern....put fox in charge of chicken coop ....
Kaine sucks -- and he's anti-choice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Less than 48 hours after the election in 08 progressives here slammed Obama
Edited on Mon Sep-27-10 09:23 PM by Gman
over Rahm. I can even tell you the well known DU'er that did it, but I won't. Now they have one less thing to whine about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yeahyeah Donating Member (741 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
139. I agree. We now live in an oligarchy, get over it. Well said. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Present company included--I was appalled that one of the first things Obama did
Edited on Mon Sep-27-10 09:29 PM by rocktivity
was get himself a DLC gatekeeper. I even asked if it was the price he had to pay to get Hillary to concede.

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. And I loved it. i don't think he could have made a better pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #22
43. You should raise your standards.. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #22
63. Of course you loved it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
108. You want the DLC-corporate wing influencing the administration?
Edited on Tue Sep-28-10 12:45 PM by defendandprotect
Well -- I'm sure that with all the pro-corporate decisions that have come out of

Obama's adminitration, you're quite happy --


Here's Rahm "crowing" about the pro-corporate "support" of the administration --

and how they 'PRESERVED PRIVATIZATION of health care'!!!

Here is the quote: ”In a Thursday interview, White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel argued that rather than recoiling against Obama, business leaders should be grateful for his support on at least a half-dozen counts: his advocacy of greater international trade and education reform open markets despite union skepticism; his rejection of calls from some quarters to nationalize banks during the financial meltdown; the rescue of the automobile industry; the fact that the overhaul of health care preserved the private delivery system; the fact that billions in the stimulus package benefited business with lucrative new contracts, and that financial regulation reform will take away the uncertainty that existed with a broken, pre-crash regulatory apparatus.

http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=B2F85DDF-18...


Among other "support" for the corporates -- often the criminal and corrupt corporates!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
59. It probably was.. A Deal in Case Obama actually overtook Hillary, which he did.
Edited on Tue Sep-28-10 03:35 AM by Grinchie
Unfortunately, it was all superficial and solely for the benefit of grabbing power for the Corporate DLC. They ran with it breathlessly, and now they are starving for oxygen while the base pisses on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #59
90. Please see Reply 89.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
89. What accounted for all the Clinton people in Obama's campaign and all his other Clinton appointees?
And his choice of Kaine to head the DNC?

Obama said he's a New Democrat. Like Hillary, "I take him at his word." I don't know of a dime's worth of difference among the DLC, New Democrats, Third Way. Same stuff, different name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
118. That's the best explanation for Obama taking DLC/Rahm into WH I've heard yet .....
Edited on Tue Sep-28-10 02:44 PM by defendandprotect
and I'm sure the SPONSORS who own Obama/Biden would be happier with fewer

Dems in Congress after this election!

Obama seems to be fond of "back room" deal making -- Pharma, health care industry ....

who knows what else?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. There will be other things.
People who hold onto petty grudges that well always find something to moan about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #18
60. Yeah... No soup for you -- Even if you are starving. How do you like that outcome?
Us little people do hold on to a little power, even though you'd rather not admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. I was certainly one who declared Rahm a mistake from the beginning
Now here we are 2 years later and from my vantage point and it certainly looks as if we were correct. Rahm was exactly as Centrist and dismissive of the Left as we thought he would be. So... I'm sorry what was your point again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
46. A big part of the reason for the criticism was that Obama kept
his DLC sympathies hidden throughout his campaign.

Like a lot of people here, if I'd known Obama was DLC I never would have supported him to the extent I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
64. That depends. If the choice of the economic team and DLCers
was Obama's, then he will simply be replaced an equally odious DLCer.

But, if he chooses someone like Howard Dean, that would be a sign that things might actually begin to improve.

It would help people decide if he were to make his choice before the midterms. It will be a bad sign if he waits 'til afterwards and this news will be viewed as political with not much hope of any real change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
67. Nah, we'll be whining at least as loud
when he appoints another corporate whore as COS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
85. I'm not well known
But I bitched about it. It was a thoroughly stupid move to put him in as COS. For some odd reason the white house might have thought there were DLC voters that needed to be appeased after he won. Maybe the move was sold to him as unifying the party or maybe Obama bought the Goodman "Team of Rivals" hype.

In any case Rahm worked as hard as anyone to screw up healthcare and I never saw a unified intelligable message come out of the White House that recommended that they were forwarding a progressive agenda. Obama needs to purge a bunch of these people from the White House and midterms are a really good excuse to do so.

Particularly when you weigh the number of Blue Dogs that are having a lot of difficulty this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
102. Why on earth would you hold onto something of no consequence IRL or even at DU for 2 years?
I don't carry a grudge from one thread to another.

Wow, seriously, dude, you're not doing yourself any favors. Let it go, along with everything like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
107. Why wouldn't Democrats be critical of DLC-corporate wing warrior being
taken into the White House by Obama --

has it turned out well for you?

Or maybe Obama's Wall Street team -- Goldman Sachs -- Geithner -- Bernanke --

have turned out well for you?

If we wanted an administration of Republicans, we wouldn't have voted for a Democrat!!

Wake up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
134. Wow... who the hell does keep track of stuff like that with such detail?
Creepy cult of personality is creepy....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. One thing we can thank him for is the blue dogs and
giving Kaine the job away from Howard Dean who was really making us proud with his candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
106. Only the 2008 Democratic Presidential nominee had the power to appoint Kaine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. I hope the door leaves a mark on his left ass cheek on the way out. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
37. Ditto!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. Goodbye and good riddance!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. Good Riddance! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. Woot!
He was SO good at keeping those Blue Dogs and
New Dems in line with Obama's "Change" leadership!

NOT.

Buh bye!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. oh-my-goodness! please go, Rahm, go!

won't be surprised in the least if we end up with even a bigger corporate a-hole in place of Rahm.

(at least Rahm is sort of sexy. :shrug: )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #19
56. I'm not that hard up
Sexy? I don't see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #56
61. In a Tanned Angelo Mozilo Clone sort of way.. Barf
They are all from the same family after all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. He can run but he probably won't win.
Edited on Mon Sep-27-10 09:36 PM by Radical Activist
He doesn't have the base of support that other candidates in the city have. When was the last time Rahm actually lived in Chicago full time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
21. To be replaced by Tom Daschle!
Edited on Mon Sep-27-10 09:48 PM by midnight armadillo
ha, just kidding...but I had you for a second there, didn't I? It wouldn't surprise me one bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markmyword Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. Rahm For Mayor?
NO WAY!

Two years is a long time to be away, and I don't think Rahm
has any idea how the folks at home are thinking. We've changed
a lot and the love between us and Obama isn't like it use to
be.
So if you think you can come back to Chicago on the coattails
that you WORKED in the White House, don't think it's going to
impress us little old folks at home.

We haven't forgotten how you've been behind all those back
door deals with the corporations. How you sold  out on health
care for the American people. You advised Obama to "look
forward and not back" in regards to prosecuting the Bush
administration. Look at all the Wall Street appointments that
this administration has made. You're the one who advised Obama
to do that and to continue the wars. Who cares what the
military advisors said, you were his Chicago friend, he would
have LISTENED to YOUR advise. I hold you responsible for
keeping the Bush agenda alive and well.

 For almost two years,Rahm has been giving the President
advice, and as far as I'm concerned, he's done a bad job.
Emmanuel has advised Obama to turn his back on his base! What
kinda of strategy is that? He thumbed his nose at transparency
for this administration, which by the way they campaigned on.
He has a nasty edge to him, which doesn't exactly make him a
lovable guy.

Sorry Rahm, if you think you're coming back and planning to
become the next mayor FORGET IT.
My advise to you, is to keep on going WEST YOUNG MAN, because
we Chicagoans aren't interested 
in your style of governing. 

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #30
129. Wow! Welcome to DU!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. I never understood why people held this guy responsible for Obama's decisions. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. Clue phone....it's for you.
Many of us disliked Rahm BEFORE Obama was even
on the radar as a presidential candidate.

I don't hold him "responsible for Obama's decisions"....

I just know he was giving him bad advise and
thumping progressives in DC every chance he got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #33
81. Seriously, that's the response I'd have...
Really..... what in THE WORLD must anyone think a decision process depends upon? The President counts on those who surround that world. It's not a vacuum, and having Rahm in that position was like a cancer inside a closed bubble.

First Larry Summers leaves as Director of Economic Council - GOOD RIDDANCE !

Now, Rahm Emaneul leaves as Chief of Staff - GREAT RIDDANCE !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #33
87.  Emanuel is not a guy I was pleased to see involved at all.
Yet, Obama picked him and was well aware of his ideas/politics and his style BEFORE, that
was my point.

Save the phone clue for someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
24. Allahu akbar!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #24
97. Jesus! I hope you're not posting from anywhere near the former premises of the NYC Burlington Coat
Factory. We don't need jihadist posting from hallowed ground. Have a little cyber respect willya?

(j/k, if you didn't already figure that out.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
133. Wouldn't "mazel tov" be more appropriate for this occasion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pezDispenser Donating Member (443 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. Kick & Rec!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yay! Rahm finally makes one good decision!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nostradammit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
28. Let the joyous news be spread!
One fewer DLC traitor in the White House.

Bunch more to get rid of yet, unfortunately.

Hope the good people of Chicago are too smart to elect him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
101. I hope they're too smart to NOMINATE him. I'd hate to see that little jerk cost Dems that seat.
And, if he's the Dem nominee, he probably would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chisox08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
29. The good news is that he is out of the White House
The Great news is that when he comes to Chicago he will get his ass handed to him. If he makes it to the run off I will support whoever is in the running against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emsimon33 Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
31. Don't let the door hit you in the *ss
There is a place reserved in hell for him and the president who put him in a position of power. Now if Arne would GO to hell without passing "go."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indianademocrat91 Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I'm sorry but I have to say this
:wtf: You want them to go to hell for what? They have bad polices yes, everyone does, however they have done some pretty damn good things. A butt-kicking on Rahm's way out yes but Hell?? Thats reserved for the lying, soldier killing, baby bush and his war criminal gang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #32
100. No pun intended, but who in hell are you to decide for whom Hell is reserved?
Edited on Tue Sep-28-10 12:23 PM by No Elephants
Unless, you're God, of course. Isn't that the whole point of the parable of the wheat and the tares (among others)?

But you can't be God, or you would know that, as a founder of the DLC. as Clinton's COS, as Congressman and as Obama's COS, Rahm's has done more than enough harm to deservea lot more than just a kick on his way out of the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
34. One guy who I hope the door DOES hit in the ass on the way out
fuckin DINO centrist sell out asshole scumbag Rahm good riddance - you've bout ruined Obama's presidency hope you're happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #34
98. You really think a guy Obama hired and never fired is to blame for Obama's Presidency?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #98
111. Ok, fine, you want to talk who's responsible for Obama's escalation in Afghanistan
- the decisions to ignore all the crimes committed under Bush/Cheney, the crappy health care bill, keeping 50,000 troops in Iraq while claiming the war is over, not ensuring equal rights for gays, etc - ultimately Obama is to blame for all that. All of it. He even said it himself - the buck stops with him. So does that make you feel better knowing Obama is making bad decisions himself?

Rahm still sucks though. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
35. Yikes. Will Obama survive in 2012 with all this staff turnover?
Oh yeah, I certainly know one of his cabinet members who needs to get out.

ARNE DUNCAN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broderick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #35
121. This is normal
Folks come and go in administrations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
36. I don't think this is going to change anything
Rahm's appointment and subsequent tenure was an indication of Obama's worldview.
I don't see how it could be interpreted any other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #36
42. This was all predestined, in fact, from the beginning of the universe.
Even so Rahm's charm will be sincerely missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #36
103. Obama's declaration that he is a New Democrat was a pretty solid indicator,too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
40. You must have missed DLC/Rahm "crowing" about how much Obama helped business...????
Rahm "crowing" .....

Here is the quote: ”In a Thursday interview, White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel argued that rather than recoiling against Obama, business leaders should be grateful for his support on at least a half-dozen counts: his advocacy of greater international trade and education reform open markets despite union skepticism; his rejection of calls from some quarters to nationalize banks during the financial meltdown; the rescue of the automobile industry; the fact that the overhaul of health care preserved the private delivery system; the fact that billions in the stimulus package benefited business with lucrative new contracts, and that financial regulation reform will take away the uncertainty that existed with a broken, pre-crash regulatory apparatus.

http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=B2F85DDF-18...


Another poster posted this at DU last month -- 8/12/10


:blush:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #40
47. This shows that Rahm's not only anti-progressive, but that he's also stupid.
Like most bullies, Rahm acts like a jerk to hide his inadequacies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #47
104. He's not acting.
Perhaps his many inadequacies and apparent soul-lessness caused him to become a jerk, but, however he got that way, he IS a jerk. He no more needs to act like a jerk than an elephant needs to act like an elephant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #40
49. Thanks for that citation -
Plan on keeping it handy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #40
62. Wow. Thta post is awesome in its capability to eviscerate the Democrats and their stupidity
Edited on Tue Sep-28-10 03:59 AM by Grinchie
I say this because I recently say the results of one of these "Lucrative Contracts" at 5,000 feet on the Big Island of Hawaii. It's a superhighway 20 miles from anywhere, built at the most inopportune time, while the infrastructure at the ports is suffering from a nightmarish, 2 lane road.

Thanks Inouye. Thanks Rahm. Thanks Abramoff. Thanks Obama.

Nothing more than bullet list items and Talking Points..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
44. Happy to Rahm go
Bye,bye :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
45. I can only hope there's a large truck to hit him on the way out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogfacedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #45
53. Really? You really want him to be hit by a truck?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. No, that wouldn't be nearly painful enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #53
69. I personally prefer him to get a really nasty rash in his crotch area
I'm glad he's leaving.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
50. It was the great Howard Dean & his "50 state strategy" NOT fucking DLC Emanuel
Edited on Tue Sep-28-10 01:38 AM by LaPera
"Howard Dean's 50-state strategy has been acknowledged by political commentators as an important factor in allowing Barack Obama to compete against John McCain in traditionally red states, during the 2008 presidential contest. In 2008, Obama won several states that had previously been considered Republican strongholds, most notably Indiana, North Carolina, and Virginia.

After Dean became Chairman of the DNC, he pledged to bring reform to the Party. Rather than focusing just on swing states, Dean proposed what has come to be known as the 50-State Strategy. The goal, the DNC says, is for the Democratic Party to be committed to winning elections at every level in every region of the country, with Democrats organized in every single voting precinct in the country. State party chairs have lauded Dean for raising money directly for the individual state parties.

Dean's strategy uses a post-Watergate model taken from the Republicans of the mid-seventies. Working at the local, state and national level, the GOP built the party from the ground up. Dean's plan is to seed the local level with young and committed candidates, building them into state candidates in future races. Dean has traveled extensively throughout the country with the plan, including places like Utah, Mississippi, and Texas, states in which Republicans have dominated the political landscape. Many establishment Democrats were at least initially dubious about the strategy's worth—political consultant and former Bill Clinton advisor, Paul Begala, suggested that Dean's plan was "just hiring a bunch of staff people to wander around Utah and Mississippi and pick their nose."
Wikipedia-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #50
120. Recommending for what you said.
Thanks!

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogfacedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
51. Sorry folks, but this whole thread sounds like
a bunch of teamonkeys whining about Lindsey Graham. Who are you going to blame next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #51
58. I blame dogfacedboy!
hey you asked.. :P :evilgrin: :rofl:

Rahm did/does suck though and is probably a bad influence on Obama - Michelle should forbid them to hang out. :) :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
52. Good riddance to bad rubbish. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyByNight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
65. Bye!
Things are lookin' up!

:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
66. Fuck you and the whores you rode in on.
The quintessential, hard balls insider
was/is a zero.

Meet you in hell, with half a finger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
on point Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
68. YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Especially if this means that Obama has finally figured out that the DLC is destroying his presidency and costing him support among the people. We voted for change, not more of the same.

Next, Obama has a clear opportunity, without the whine of blaming it on the republicans, to appoint someone who is clearly in support of change and not more of the same.

If he appoints another DINO sore, I predict he will lose the election in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
70. I'm glad to see Rahm go.
It is just such a shame that our choices are the "lesser of two evils" at election time, in Most cases.
I know what it will take for the people to be heard...mainly publicly financed elections.
When will we demand that?
I don't want to whine and I do not want a "repub take-over" of congress.
I want to vote and know that my candidate will actually represent a progressive view that is actually shared by the majority.
Really, from Universal health care to corporate responsibility, the majority desperately want and deserve this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
71. Now that made my day! Good riddance. Hope the good people of Chicago
find a Democratic to run as mayor. I for one will be glad to donate to any Dem who runs against this slime ball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
72. K&YAY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
73. Why wait? Go NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
budkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
75. You won't be missed a**hole!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Uncola Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
76. Is there some way..
.. to prevent the little creep from ever speaking to anyone in the administration again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
77. He's leaving on awfully short notice
And Obama sounded rather noncommital when asked to comment ("He'd make a good mayor").

Makes me wonder - is his departure totally voluntary? Or has Obama finally gotten fed up, torn up the pre nomination deal he made with the DLC (hire Emanuel and Hillary will drop out), realized he has nothing to lose by cutting this tumor out of his administration?

I think there's a very good chance he was asked to leave and allowed to use the mayor's race thing as cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #77
109. Maybe, but he said long before Obama that he'd love to be Mayor of Chicago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #109
144. Has he maintained a residence there?
Is he even eligible to run?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
79. Now that is not "retarded"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BEZERKO Donating Member (564 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
83. Well, one of the first things Obama did
in planning for the all important transition phase was hiring John Podesta to orgnaize the transition and the transition team. For whatever reason, Podesta hired Rahm Emanuel for the COS position, mistake number 2. Emanuel has been a disaster. Maybe it's Karma, maybe it's just incompetence, but it's time for him to go. Obama ultimately deserves the blame for the political oversights and failures. I just hope he lets Drew Westen back into the sphere of influence, or maybe George Lakoff, or someone who understands how the political brain/mind really works. It's also difficult to govern or set policy without that understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
84. Bye Rahm. Pfft! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
86. What will Israel do without him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
93. I'll say it again, I like Rahm Emanuel and I hope he
enjoys being the Mayor of Chicago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TK421 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
95. I wish you people wouldn't cheer something like this....
It's fucking retarded :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #95
96. LOL, that was very good! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
99. The "change" he brought
Wouldn't even cover his tolls from D.C. to Chicago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #99
110. Did Rahm ever promise change?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #110
113. No, Rahm just steals our change - and our dollars.
Edited on Tue Sep-28-10 01:03 PM by slay
he's a rich asshole who will win at all costs - even when that win means nothing - he wants a technical "win" like with healthcare, not a REAL win which would have been single-payer or hell even a public option.

Anyways, not sure why you are standing up for scumbag Rahm so much in this thread. :shrug:

*on edit - changed a bunch of stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #110
116. His "team" promised change
His boss campaigned on change, but Rahm has not done a whole hell of a lot to inact that, IMO.

He's happier under the Bu$hCo "corporations first" umbrella.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
112. Such mean posters! As Rahm leaves, we should be giving him a hand.
Like this.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #112
114. I'll give him a finger
like this ..|..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #112
117. Or take up a collection to send him a crate of dead fish.
Seems only fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
115. Excellent!
:woohoo: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
122. Good... but who will be the replacement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #122
141. Joe LIEberman or Jim DeMint ?
Edited on Wed Sep-29-10 04:44 AM by Hubert Flottz
Maybe Ben Nelson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
123. too late. damage done. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
125. As head of DCC he helped to put a lot of DINOs in office, often working AGAINST progressive
candidates. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
127. Couldn't happen fast enough!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creon Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
128. abrasive and controversial
Many will not miss him. He does seem to be quite abrasive and rude and crude. Maybe Obama wanted an attack dog; maybe Clinton wanted him. It is probably time for him to go.

I do not think that a COS should be so high profile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud_Lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
130. Can't say that upsets me.
In fact, it brought my mood up significantly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
132. It feels like Christmas already!
Good Riddance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oldtimeralso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
135. I'm Glad Rahm is Leaving...
and I'm even more glad that I moved out of Chicago!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
136. "...he is leaving his post at the White House..."
....don't let the door hit you in the ass, rahm....and, thanks for memories....I sure hope you don't lose the mayors' race....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
137. With this are they trying to buy my vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
140. First of all Pres Obama choose Rahm. Why would we think he will choose someone less abrasive?
Second, Rahm isnt gone, he has only moved. He will still be a big factor in the New-Democratic Machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
143. good riddance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC