Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. government funds may have gone to Taliban

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sonomak Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 12:55 AM
Original message
U.S. government funds may have gone to Taliban
Source: Los Angeles Times

Millions of dollars in American taxpayer funds may have been paid to Taliban fighters in southern Afghanistan to provide security for a U.S. development project, a government audit has found.

The report, released Thursday by the inspector general of the U.S. Agency for International Development, says subcontractors hired to protect a development project near Jalalabad may have paid more than $5 million to the militants through local authorities. Allegations often have been made about such payments, but the report is a rare investigation by the government into a specific case.

The audit examined payments for security under a $349-million contract awarded to a U.S. contractor, Development Alternatives Inc., for a small-scale infrastructure and community development project. Because the Taliban fighters are entrenched in the area and it is deemed too dangerous to be visited regularly by the contractor, Development Alternatives left it to local subcontractors to negotiate security arrangements.

The report says local authorities often demand a 20% "protection tax" in such circumstances. Under those deals — along the lines of extortionist protection rackets in the U.S. — the Taliban sends security guards with promises that they won't attack the subcontractors or their equipment and won't try to halt the contract work, the report says.


Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-fg-taliban-payoffs-20101001,0,1379818.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would have tried to negotiate a 15% protection tax. 20's a bit high.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. It is like the U.S. government will give money to everyone BUT the U.S. taxpayer.
Edited on Fri Oct-01-10 01:03 AM by Poll_Blind
I swear to shit. Is there no-one the U.S. does not fund? Oh, wait, I'm sure there's some group out there, handing out condom pamphlets in fucking Africa that got turned down because one of the cartoons showing how to put it on depicts a woman with dots for nipples.

No...No money for you! No Titty Law, dontchaknow! Oh, hey, hold on...Taliban on the other line. Gotta go!

And there's a beggar on every street corner from the center of town to almost waaaaaay out where I live.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Perhaps we need to start a lobbying group.
We could call it the American-Taxpayer Public Affairs Committee or ATPAC for short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. How does this differ from what the US Govt was doing in Iraq?
Edited on Fri Oct-01-10 02:33 AM by PoliticAverse
Essentially paying protection money/bribes as part of "the surge".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. It's exactly the same. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. *facepalm*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. *facepalm*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. Meanwhile back at the ranch...
School buses drive across bridges that should have been torn down and rebuilt ten years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. 1,200 NASA workers to be laid off.
Maybe if they join the Taliban they could keep their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corpseratemedia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. bribery/corruption better than funding our commons?
no massive profit to ultimately made in funding our infrastructure? taxation? accountability? the culmulative effect of 60 years of propaganda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. FUBAR.
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. Of course they did --
was there any doubt? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC