Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Governor Schwarzenegger Signs Bill to Reduce Marijuana Penalties in California

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 09:32 AM
Original message
Governor Schwarzenegger Signs Bill to Reduce Marijuana Penalties in California
Source: Salem News

Oct-01-2010 01:46printcomments
Governor Schwarzenegger Signs Bill to Reduce Marijuana Penalties in California
Bonnie King Salem-News.com

The new bill changes marijuana possession of less than an ounce to an infraction.
Schwarzenegger marijuana
Salem-News.com

(SACRAMENTO) - From California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, on September 30, 2010.

To the Members of the California State Senate:

I am signing Senate Bill 1449.

This bill changes the crime of possession of less than an ounce of marijuana from a misdemeanor punishable only by a $100 fine to an infraction punishable by a $100 fine. Under existing law, jail time cannot be imposed, probation cannot be ordered, nor can the base fine exceed $100 for someone convicted of this crime.

I am opposed to decriminalizing the possession and recreational use of marijuana and oppose Proposition 19, which is on the November ballot.

Unfortunately, Proposition 19 is a deeply flawed measure that, if passed, will adversely impact California’s businesses without bringing in the tax revenues to the state promised by its proponents.

Read more: http://www.salem-news.com/articles/october012010/schwarzenegger-marijuana.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Arnold's reaction to the bill...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. arnold%20smoking%20weed.jpg
wow. What was that from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Pumping Iron
From the documentary movie _Pumping Iron_:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqep14L2f7k&has_verified=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Thanks, I will watch it later
No Youtube in the cube.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
35. LOL!
That's when pot was goooood! You can see it in his eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
55. At that time body builders were heavy into PCP. One of my
friends was a top competitor in the sport, knew all the top people including Arnold. He told me about the use of PCP and that it was widespread in the gyms. So that doobie might have been dusted. They called it Angel Dust and it really messed you up.

Muscle heads really partied hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
j420norcal Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. HA HA Classic
I saw the tag for this when reading the main post, and even before I scrolled down I knew it was going to be this picture.

Nice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. "will adversely impact California’s businesses"
Yeah, the ones who profit off of marijuana being illegal. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. AND, liquor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Big Alcohol is a Big Member of the aforementioned group...one of the biggest, in fact
who consistently lobby for continued marijuana prohibition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. super, first time I've given him props.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The other California issue this year
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. cool
just a month and a half before it becomes fully legal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Not quite
Edited on Fri Oct-01-10 10:44 AM by PoliticAverse
It will still be illegal at the Federal Level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Meh..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Well that will give the FBI something else to do besides busting anti war protesters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. It's the DEA and they're already busy at it...

http://dailycaller.com/2010/09/13/speak-no-evil-dea-doj-stay-mum-on-medical-marijuana-raids/print/#ixzz0zPnGmPFi

"Despite campaign promises to the contrary, the Department of Justice under President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder hasn’t stopped raiding marijuana dispensaries operating in states where sale of the drug is legal for medical purposes. But the DOJ has demonstrated one marked change now that it’s under Democratic control: The department has stopped publicizing medical marijuana raids, both by requesting that more cases be sealed under court order and by refusing to distribute press releases."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uncle ray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. you quote an inaccurate statement.
it was not promised that ALL raids would stop in medical states, it was promised that no raids would happen on those operating within their state's laws, and that is exactly what has happened. much to the dismay of the conservative types around colorado who want all the green crosses shut down. the rhetoric has not just changes, so has their actions. you cannot go anywhere in Denver or Colorado Springs without seeing the effect of a major shift in policy. there are approximately 1000 medical marijuana related businesses registered with the state and operating openly in colorado right now. that was not the case two years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
56. Fuck! That is terrible. What do they have against pot? It is not as harmful as alcohol.
And doesn't make people mean.  It mellows them out.  It should
be prescribed for some folks. Should replace some meds. 

That is why, huh?  They don't want to lose a piece of the
revenue streams from their pharmaceuticals. 

There is enough of all of it to go around for everyone.  
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Marble Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Yeah. Let's see the DEA arrest 3 million California pot smokers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. yaaaahoooooo!!
KNR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drops_not_Dope Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. LEGALIZE
NOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Tipping point
We seem to be at a tipping point right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
18. The only thing criminal about marijuana are the laws regarding marijuana.
Kudos to Arnold on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. Arnie does things I like and things I hate.
Just like when he was in the movies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. I am signing senate bill 1449: done! now everyone pls light up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. Smoke em if you got em but it will cost ya if the state finds out.
Still trying to generate some revenue off of pot, but this does make it somewhat like a parking ticket.

One thing I did not see is whether or not the judge can order drug counseling? just curious :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. What's changing this right wing horror into a good guy .... ??? What's going on ????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
41. He lives in Santa Monica. It's not like he ever was an uber-fundie or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. He wasn't???? Plus the homophobic "girlie-man" ... and his treatment of women ...???
Also fond of Nazi 'chick' accessories ...

Arnold Schwarzenegger appeared on the Time Magazine Cover (June 25, 2007 issue) with Michael Bloomberg, the Jewish mayor of New York, wearing a Nazi chic belt buckle with a symbol that resembles a certain Nazi SS insignia, the SS Totenkopf.


Schwarzenegger loves the Nazi look of his belt buckle and how it provokes people when he dresses like a Nazi in the International media. He knew it produced a minor scandal when he wore it on the cover of Time Magazine. As if to make sure that we know that he knows that it symbolizes Nazism, he wore it again nine months later in the March 2008 issue of Esquire Magazine.


This is an English translation of a Falter Article about Arnold Schwarzenegger wearing a Totenkopf (Death’s Head) Ring on a trip to his home town in Graz, Austria. Falter is a weekly news magazine published in Vienna. This is not a professional translation, but gives you a good idea about what took place there. That he wore a Totenkopf Ring to apparently provoke the politicians in his home town, with whom he had had a dispute over enforcement of the death penalty, suggests that he knows full well that the Totenkopf can be perceived as a Nazi symbol.


Schwarzenegger’s Father, a Brown Shirt and Nazi

A son is, of course, not guilty of the sins of the father. But most fathers do pass some values and attitudes to their sons and it is worthwhile to consider what kind of attitudes Arnold Schwarzenegger’s father had that the son may have learned from him. USA Today reported here that his father applied to join the Nazi party on March 1, 1938, about two weeks before Austria was annexed and while it was still illegal in Austria. There is some confusion about when his application was accepted. It may not have been accepted until 1941, about the time he joined the Wehrmacht.However nearly a year after he applied to join the Nazi party, he joined the Brown Shirts (or SA), also called Nazi Storm Troopers. That means he was not just a member of the Nazi party, who may have joined for social reasons. No one joined the Brown Shirts, just because they wanted a better career or to help feed their family. They were the street fighters that fought opponents of the Nazi Dictatorship in the streets and rounded up “Undesirables” to be shipped off to concentration camps. It means that he was a fanatical supporter of the Nazi cause, who wanted to actively support the takeover at that time of Austria by the Nazi Reich and the elimination of Jews and others considered to be “undesirables by the Nazis.

And, then again ....

Ethics group named Schwarzenegger one of America's worst governors

In its April 2010 report, ethics watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington named Schwarzenegger one of 11 "worst governors" in the United States because of various ethics issues throughout Schwarzenegger's term as governor.<58><59><60> Some of Schwarzenegger's ethics lapses cited by the watchdog include:

- Used non-profit and campaign funds for personal benefit
- Built cozy relationships with special interests
- Created conflicts of interest by accepting a consulting position and doing state business with a company staffed by his former campaign aides
- Provided state jobs to friends with dubious qualifications
- Allegedly pressured government employees to change outcomes
- Did not provide adequate leadership to the state
- Vetoed bills to improve transparency in hospitals at the behest of powerful special interests<61>




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
42. Gropenfurher has never been a "right wing horror"
Politically, he's what's called a "liberal Republican", which puts him a nosehair to the right of a Blue Dog Dem.

Practically, Arnold is conservative on business issues and taxes, but tends to be a moderate on social and environmental issues. I can tell you that most environmental groups focusing on in-state issues have actually been happier with Ahnold than they were with his predecessor. Musclebrain also formally opposed Prop 8, and has steadfastly refused to fight in support of it (conservative groups even sued him to try and force him to fight for it).

My real position on Der Guvnah has always been summed up simply as: "We could have done a lot better, but we could have done a lot worse."

In this election, I'm aiming for better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Don't agree at all with that rosy portral of Arnold .... especially if you
consider his treatment of women -- and his "girlie-man" comments --

No -- I think he's been weighing the odds of progressing further in politics in America

and doesn't see a GOP future -- therefore, the gradual slide to the left --

But, overall, I'd say he's a snake of the worst kind -- willing to do anything to become

"famous" -- or written up in history books -- according to his own statements.


PLUS ....

Ethics group named Schwarzenegger one of America's worst governors

In its April 2010 report, ethics watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
named Schwarzenegger one of 11 "worst governors" in the United States because of various ethics issues throughout Schwarzenegger's term as governor.<58><59><60> Some of Schwarzenegger's ethics lapses cited by the watchdog include:

- Used non-profit and campaign funds for personal benefit
- Built cozy relationships with special interests
- Created conflicts of interest by accepting a consulting position and doing state business with a company staffed by his former campaign aides
- Provided state jobs to friends with dubious qualifications
- Allegedly pressured government employees to change outcomes
- Did not provide adequate leadership to the state
- Vetoed bills to improve transparency in hospitals at the behest of powerful special interests<61>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Lol! I never said he was a liberal.
Or that he was honest, for that matter. A "Liberal Republican" is still a right winger, he's just on the left edge of their range. He's still to the right of Blue Dogs, and makes Blanche Lincoln look liberal by comparison. He's simply a moderate on social and environmental issues.

But some here have tried to equate him to a teabagger, which is really kinda silly (not in this discussion, but in many other threads over the years). His politics are nowhere near that far right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. "Gropenfuhrer" ..... ???
Edited on Fri Oct-01-10 08:58 PM by defendandprotect
Seemed an acknowledgment of his right wingism while at the same time denying it --

Many females have described his behavior as atrocious --

A T-bagger isn't quite a Nazi, but certainly we've watched Arnhold flirting with Nazi

trappings -- in important settings like national magazine covers.

Some say he's offered a Nazi salute in one of his body building photos.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. Hey, what the hell can you expect from a Republican governor?.............
...........I don't want to sing this guys praises, but he at least is fucking "reasonable" on a lot of issues. I HOPE prop 19 passes AND I don't even live in Calif. The benefit to the rest of the country will be immense. PLUS, if a lot of these crazy motherfuckers "light up" this country will be a lot better off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. Come on Arnud you are a Democrat! Come on over, the water's fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. "Arnold Considered Party Switch"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleGirl Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. You are so "a Democrat Arnold !!!!" Come on, Man
Admit it. You are a damn Democrat from Austria. You know it, I know it, just admit now. You have LEFT THE Republican party and gone to the BEST SIDE.

Be good Arnold. Keep it up. You are one of us.
The water is fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
26. When one side dominates on a social/culture war issue, you can afford...
Edited on Fri Oct-01-10 02:24 PM by SteveM
to make favorable reforms; the other side (Democrats) have been so cowed on this issue, they wouldn't have the credibility or power to reform the law. I mean, you don't wanna be known as soft-on-drugs, do you?

The GOP has considerable potential to secure younger "independent" voters by using the same issue they pounded Democrats with, only in a different manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Nixon
"Only Nixon could go to China".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Why, he certainly was not "soft on mari-, er, communism."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
50. Nixon could have decriminalized more than 30 years ago...and should have
but he wanted to make himself look like a "law and order" candidate and he hated the "Jews" he blamed for recommending decriminalization and he hated the anti-war demonstrators that smoked it, and, apparently, he hated the Vietnam Veterans who used it to cope with the aftereffects of that imperial crusade.

So, Nixon, fuck you very much for 30 plus years of bullshit. It's nice to see another Californian undo some of the damage Nixon (and Reagan after him) did to this nation.

CA - vote YES on 19!

Make History!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
32. Well, it's a start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
34. This is probably a stop gap to decrease support for Prop 19. "See, we already made it virtually
legal. Why not just leave it at that."

Bull shit. LEGALIZE it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. up. I posted the same thought without seeing your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #39
52. It happens. I think we're right.
Legalizing marijuana is the first step to true drug law reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #34
53. Likewise for his health care reforms. They know Brown won't veto single payer
little pre-emption. Looks like Arnie doesn't think Meg will win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
36. I'm going long on Twinky and Cheetos futures.
=Profit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
37. Yippie Skippie
Here is the Cowboy Ahhnold in his first Amereikan mooovie

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Ann Margaret
yeah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
38. This seems to be a ploy to undermine Prop 19.
It won't work.

I'd give odds on P19 passing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. I wouldn't bet money on Prop 19 passing. It's really too close to call.
The last numbers I saw on it put support at 52%, but the "Undecided" group was at 7% and there was a 4% margin of error. "Undecided" voters, statistically, tend to be older and middle class, two groups that have moderate voting records. It's likely that a majority of that 7% will end up on the "No" side on voting day.

Prop 19, at this point, really is too close to call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Also depends on whether or not you're all voting on computers or have your votes
counted by computers!!

Meanwhile, elites will have a special interest in keeping the Drug Wars going --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Marble Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #43
51. The polls have pretty consistently shown it leading.
But only a couple have it over 50%, and that's a scary sign.

I'm kind of counting on some "unlikely voters" showing up next month. Hell, people showed up during the primary election wanting to vote for it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
48. Wow, he should tell our POTUS how good it feels not to be a total hypocrite on the issue! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
54. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
57. I hope it all passes and the Feds get on the same page with the people.
Aren't the fed and the state supposed to duke it on and then
inform the people?  Why do people need to live with two
different laws?  I think this is unconstitutional that the
feds can arrest us for something the state condones.  It
doesn't seem right.

On a good note:  I am glad the governor understands his
constituents and their preferences.  Now figure out how to
stop the feds from acting like this, please. Or will this be
an excuse to bring in the AIF? 

Yuk...hope not. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-10 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
58. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC