Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ex-policeman who supplied Tasers fired at Raoul Moat siege kills himself

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 09:37 AM
Original message
Ex-policeman who supplied Tasers fired at Raoul Moat siege kills himself
Source: Daily Mail

A former policeman who supplied the controversial Tasers used to stun murderer Raoul Moat is believed to have committed suicide after his company lost its licence to sell the weapons.

Peter Boatman, 57, is thought to have feared his business Pro-Tect Systems would collapse after the lucrative Government licence was revoked last week.

He had also recently learned that his company might face police action for breaching the terms of its licence and supplying the weapons directly to Northamptonshire Police, where Mr Boatman was a former inspector.

Pro-Tect Systems supplied four experimental long-range X-12 Tasers to the force that were used during the tense six-hour stand-off with gunman Moat in Rothbury, Northumberland, in July.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1316915/Ex-policeman-supplied-Tasers-fired-Raoul-Moat-commits-suicide.html?ITO=1490



300 foot effective range. Doubt they'd be used again in the UK for some time, if ever , and hopefully never in the USA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's so heartbreaking when the neo-con death merchants kill themselves...where's the empathy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Death merchant? Do you know something about him that's not in the story?
Dude made Tasers. Those are used to try to save someone's life when the only other option is deadly force. Cops over here use them wrong and have caused too many deaths, but they've also saved a lot of people who would have otherwise been shot.

The article says the guy even shot himself many times with Tasers to prove they were safe.

Maybe I'm too liberal, but I do think it's heartbreaking when someone suffering from depression kills himself instead of seeking treatment. I imagine the man's wife and children find it heartbreaking, too. You must be a tougher person than me, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. He'd have had a job
shooting himself with one those. It fires a "shotgun" cartridge. Imagine that hitting you in the face.

Fuck him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. That was his mistake, using that before it was tested, but he was trying to save the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Never mind tested
It was an unauthorised firearm. Its not the policeman who shot the guy who's committed suicide - its the supplier of the weapon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Yes, the supplier was an ex-cop who worked for the force who used the Taser on Moat.
He supplied the Tasers to that force, before they were authorized for use, because of Moat, according to the sources I've read. The cops fired twice at Moat when they thought the negotiations had failed, and Moat killed himself.

I'm not saying Boatman did nothing wrong, and for all we know the Taser may have caused him to shoot himself, but the celebrating his death because he sold Tasers (this year's equivalent of pit bulls, it seems) is horrifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Better than buckshot. Removes your head at the jawline , ouchie(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. What is important is that Mr. Boatman can no longer cause harm to others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. What's important is that a human being suffering from depression killed himself
and you are happy. Mr. Boatman wanted to stop a murderer from killing himself. You are happy he killed himself. Doesn't take a mathematical equation to work out who the better person was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Look Mr fucking "liberal", have you ever been fucking broke?..........
........I don't mean having only 10 dollars in your pocket, I mean fucking broke, with either no job or a really shitty job? Have you had 3 kids at 21 yrs old and a shitty job and a shittier apartment? Have you been in a "juvenile" jail at 16 for nothing more than running away from home? I have, and I NEVER thought of killing myself or anyone else. So go play your pseudo liberal phony shit somewhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Yes.
Except the jail part. I watched my brothers and sister wind up there, but avoided it myself.

So tell me what that has to do with gloating over someone's suicide?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. He was weak, that's what. If you have a business, wealth, family.............
.......and (I assume friends) then if you exit via suicide, you are weak in character. I am now 63 yo and have been somewhat fortunate in that I got a belated education and was fortunate to get a union job and retire (modestly). This guy was a POS and like I said "weak in character". I am not cheering that he "suicided", but the did what he did and FUCK HIM. If you want to defend a human piece of shit JUST because he "suicided", then you are in need of some help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. You have no experience with mental illness.
By all accounts he was thrown into a deep depression over Moat's death and his company's role in it. He needed help for that depression. Don't give me that George Bush Bootstrap bullshit. I've seen people stronger than either of us try to kill themselves (one succeeded) because of depression they couldn't fight. I've never faced it, either, but I've looked in the eyes of people trying to fight it, and to call them weak is even more despicable than calling a man you've never met and know nothing about a "piece of shit" for no other reason than... Well, Hell, you haven't even given a reason. You just "know" that he was, I guess. If me getting the "help" you want me to get makes me that judgmental and inhuman, I don't want it. I'm a liberal because I'm sick of that kind of shit. Why are you a liberal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I'm done. Have a nice life, mr "liberal".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Figured you'd do that, mr "strong."
People who can't handle it tend to bail out. See?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Yeah, you're right, mr liberal. You win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. You're right, jobycom has won
I've rarely seen anyone do such a good job of character assassination on themselves as you just have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
39. There's one word that defines a real "Liberal". Empathy.
Edited on Sat Oct-02-10 06:28 PM by Turborama
I think of it as the glue that binds us all together. And you have boatloads of it!

:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Thanks.
I kind of needed that. And I'm still laughing over your beer story in your profile. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Nonsense...
Tasers typically aren't used to avoid "deadly force"; they're used to punish, or torture, or to exert alpha-male "authority", or so that dumb cops don't have to learn how to talk someone down. Cops are completely out of control and need to be reigned in. They have become a tool of the plutocracy and a direct threat to liberty. Now THAT is the liberal viewpoint, so don't come here and try to pass your cop-centric view as "liberal".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Wrong.
Tasers are supposed to be used in lieu of deadly force. You've swallowed the hysteria, and that's understandable. Like pit bulls or fear of Muslims, you've gotten a warped opinion from hearing one hand clapping.

They aren't always used the way they are supposed to be. There needs to be more regulation and more punishment for cops who use them the way you describe. But that doesn't mean that a man who builds Tasers for a living is a death merchant. The man tried to stop a suicide. The suicide victim was a murderer that some of the cops probably wanted dead. Some of them, even in England, were probably hoping he'd either shoot himself or turn the shotgun on them so they could blow him away. This ex-cop who made Tasers for a living tried to find a way to stop him from killing himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. It is sad when you have a world people don't want to live in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
herbm Donating Member (980 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Did he use a taser?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. rest in piss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Use and misuse
I understand the original idea of tasers as an alternate to deadly force and that use is a reasonable approach. The problem I have is with the misuse or possible misuse of these technologies. We hear way too many stories of people being tased for basically just not obeying an officer fast enough, or pissing off an officer or the officer just being in a bad mood. Also consider that these technologies, along with many others such as heat and sound oriented crowd control, have a very scary possibility of being used against citizens simply using their right to freedom of speech. The government through the years (Chicago, 1968) has not hesitated to use and force at their fingertips to limit the peoples ability to express disagreement with the sitting government. Can we be assured that these new technologies won't be used for that purpose? I don't think so. Strong controls should be put on their distribution and valid use and even stronger penalties should be put on the misuse of those same technologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Using a taser
attached to wires for use in close proximity may have its uses but one which fires a cartridge 300 feet is another matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. vs a 308 cal round sure. If you want the peson to live you use a tazer. If you want them to die
Edited on Sat Oct-02-10 03:02 PM by Pavulon
you push a piece of metal through their brain at mach 2. There's your difference.


I can post pictures of what a rifle round does to a persons head, "less lethal" is not part of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Aren't you on the wrong website? I think you're looking for "militia sites".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Is this the one where people use their brains, before they say dumb shit?
I know you are incapable of discussing this topic from a position of knowledge. The smart thing would be to say nothing or inform yourself.


If the police wanted to kill him they would have shot in the head with a bolt action 308 caliber rifle. He would drop like a rock.

If they wanted to try to save him from killing himself they would use a less lethal solution. It failed.

The article is about a person who breached process, not who killed anyone. His suffered a setback and killed himself, like many other people do.

The ignorant around here have chosen to make ill informed statements about tazers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I stand by my statement. AND, you are a fucking "gun nut" talking.......
........shit about caliber and such shit that has absolutely not a goddamn thing to do with the discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. use that AND like you need a slur there.. Insert one and see how it sounds..
still no content from you. Got anything to say on topic, here I'll help.

Police tried to use a less lethal device to prevent a man from killing himself. That is a better option than lethal force, which they could have used.

The article is not a vote about legality of morality of less lethal solutions. Less means less, so less lethal solutions should be used when there is a critical need.

If that was my family member who had already met the requirements to be shot in the head with a high powered rifle I would appreciate the police trying something other than a rifle round. I would also be happy he did not kill an officer during the process.

Suicide is unfortunate, this person had not hurt people, he did not invent VX gas or something.

Content is harder than ad hominem, give it a try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. I love your content using a bullet and sounding like a fucking instructor.........
.........at "police academy". This was about this ass holes suicide. He owned a business supplying tasers to police forces. These tasers are the "easy way" to control people. Are there situations where they are helpful, sure they are. The BIG problem with these "less than lethal" devices is that they are misused by untrained, sometimes psycho people that plain don't give a fuck if they hurt someone or not. There are more and more stories of these contraptions being used in not only inappropriate manner, but in outright cruel and criminal ways. So push your bullshit elsewhere. Nice pic with the bullet, by the way sparky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. So you do think tasers are sometimes useful, then?
Odd of you to cheer the man's suicide, then, unless you cheer all suicides. He didn't own the business; he was one of the directors, who had earlier been a policeman (and in between, he worked in a company that consults on how to reduce workplace violence). So if you accept tasers can sometimes be helpful, your beef should be with the people who use them inappropriately, not people who supply them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Reducing workplace violence?
That's so weak!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. He was awarded the Queen's Police Medal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. So this guy is an asshole because he sold tazers?
people misuse their cars, not henry fords problem. In some cases, well this was not one of those cases. The police used the less lethal option to try and prevent the guy from killing himself. How is that a problem?

The bullet is old school and will also prevent a person from committing suicide. Although the desired outcome will not be had. The police arent going to start walking off in response to a situation. Would you like them to go back to the baton or to the bullet?

You are still fucking up the content part I mentioned. I mean what the fuck is your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC