Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ahmadinejad calls for US leaders to be 'buried'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 07:34 AM
Original message
Ahmadinejad calls for US leaders to be 'buried'
Source: AP

Ahmadinejad calls for US leaders to be 'buried'
By ALI AKBAR DAREINI (AP) – 46 minutes ago

TEHRAN, Iran — Iran's president Sunday called for U.S. leaders to be "buried" in response to what he says are American threats of military attack against Tehran's nuclear program.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is known for brash rhetoric in addressing the West, but in a speech Sunday he went a step further using a deeply offensive insult in response to U.S. statements that the military option against Iran is still on the table.

"May the undertaker bury you, your table and your body, which has soiled the world," he said using language in Iran reserved for hated enemies.

Several top U.S. officials including Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff have said in recent months that the military option remains on the table and there is a plan to attack Iran, although a military strike has been described as a bad idea.


Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5goykFnHZsAqRUFl1bXBuWbVNcpkgD9IK6PJG0?docId=D9IK6PJG0



US has 'dragged the world in mud' says Ahmadinejad
(AFP) – 2 hours ago

TEHRAN — Iran's hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad launched a vitriolic tirade against the United States and Israel on Sunday as he cast fresh doubt on the September 11 attacks, state media reported.

"They have such nerve to threaten us and say all options are on the table. May the undertaker take you, your tables... away as you have dragged the world in mud," Ahmadinejad was quoted as saying in a speech.

The United States and Israel accuse Iran of seeking nuclear weapons and have never ruled out a military strike to curb Tehran's atomic drive. Iran maintains its atomic programme has peaceful aims.

"We have hundreds of unanswered questions about the September 11 incident to which they should respond, and we will not back down on this," Ahmadinejad said in the speech marking the start of a housing project outside Tehran.

more:http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gYIGZEL_quTiKGu4_ut9WnvVQQ6w?docId=CNG.23111bf2d9c2a75f1ce1e14c0bcb1919.2a1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is this a native colloquialism that sounds worse to anyone who isn't familiar with Iran
and their traditional customs and smack talking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Kruschev said the same thing 50 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Kruschev said it with STYLE and grace and class. Kruschev was a friend of mine.
Ahmedinejad is no Kruschev.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Kruschev meant "we will attend your funeral"
Meaning that the Soviet Union would outlive the United States.

That's quite a different message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Thanks.
You saved my having to say that.

However, even at the time, most Americans heard it as a death threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. See, because it's okay for the US to threaten Iran, but for Iran to respond
is "brash" and a "vitriolic tirade"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Yep, that whole thing about national sovereignty and such is only
for 'Murikans.

American exceptionalism - promoting global destruction one country at a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheIdiot Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. I must have missed the part where we said...
that Iranians must simply die. Guess i'd better go do some research...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. The threat of a nuclear strike, invasion, etc.
The US has been quite blustery about "all options" being on the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #22
34. our language is different, but the meaning is the same: "the military option"
is how it is phrased by the US government, but the end result is the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think that's pretty much where everyone ends up...

what is it they say about death & taxes?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Who gives a farting fuck what that c*ck-wagging blowhard thinks?
Sheesh.

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. 'Please invade us.' nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Pardon my native colloquialism that isn't as bad as it sounds to a non-American...
Phone-pole sodomize that bullshit asshole tinpot dictator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. Oh fuck that silly little troll doll. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJvR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. Hehe!
He is probably a bit grumpy that his A-bomb program caught the Stuxnet bug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonomak Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
11. Ahmadinejad and his mullahs need to be gone
Edited on Sun Oct-03-10 09:40 AM by sonomak
One of these days the Iranian people are gonna send them to the crane
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
12. He sounds like a TeaBagger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. And looks like a Middle-Eastern George W. Bush.
Including the squint and smirk.

Not to mention the stolen election





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
15. The alternative is cremation? left for buzzards?
Time for the Bombiran song.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
16. Who is this ALI AKBAR DAREINI? Greedy? How much?
"The speech was broadcast by both state television and the official English-language Press TV, but the latter glossed over the insult in the simultaneous translation."

Like the U.S. can afford a bigger (and endless) clusterf*ck to profit only the ruling class...

:hangover:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
creon Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
18. Fatuous
He does not need any enemies; he has himself.

He is not prepared to have a diplomatic conversation with the USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Um, the United States has repeatedly snubbed Iran's efforts
at diplomacy. The fatuousness is not one sided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheIdiot Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. WTF? I thought the president...
reached out to Islam... like about a hundred times. So, which is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Well, this president is "reaching out" with drones that mostly kill civilians
right now. But the previous president ignored several gestures of reconciliation by the Iranians. I don't recall if there have been any since Obama took office. This State Department hasn't really distinguished itself from the previous one, in any case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creon Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-10 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #23
35. neither side
Neither side is ready to talk to each other. That is not surprising considering the bad blood between the two.

It will be a long time before either party will be willing to talk to the other.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bherrera Donating Member (600 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. I think the US does not want to talk to Iran
Iran did suggest they hold talks. The USA has refused to do this. It is routine for the USA to follow an anti-USA diplomacy, because its politicians are driven by powerful lobbies. This is your fault, Americans. You should learn to take care of yourselves, and stop attacking other countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guyton Donating Member (370 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. Pretend for a minute, that you were in charge of a small country near Iraq ...
Ok, pretend for a minute that you were in charge of a small country, with lots of oil, near Iraq, and sorta couldn't help but notice that the US invaded on completely illegal grounds. Preventative war? I believe that used to be called "first strike" and is a war crime.

And then you note that the people who are responsible for it are all unapologetic braggarts, with no fear of being tried and convicted for their crimes and the hundreds of thousands of deaths that they are responsible for.

Wouldn't it behove you to get nuclear weapons to keep from being invaded? Wouldn't it be a moral compulsion to defend yourself and your country?

There's more than a simple moral reason to go after our war criminals. The ramifications are continuing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheIdiot Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. yeah, it's ok if WE go after our war criminals...
we are, after all, a nation of laws, are we not?

i just have a problem with our gutless fucking "leaders" allowing an insane asshole to go nuclear and using Shrub as cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. Iran is not a 'small country'
It is one of the larger and more powerful countries in the region. I don't think they were particularly scared by the 2003 invasion -- actually, it's been argued they privately welcomed it, since it removed their most worrisome enemy and opened the door to future influence as Iraq's leadership became more Shi'a and the US forces left, both of which became inevitable once the Sunnis were booted from power and some level of democracy was introduced. Part of their motivation for wanting nuclear weapons is deterrence no doubt, but it's also about throwing their weight around and asserting dominance over the smaller Sunni Arab countries in the region, all of whom lack nuclear weapons and don't much care for Iran. Iran is not some defenseless lamb -- for a long, long time, many Iranian leaders (and regular people) have seen their country as a great power, even if outsiders don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
27. They should be "Bound in bitter chains beneath the wide-weyed earth."
Well, I would have tried a bit of Hesiod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. "Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones."
Rocking it "prince of peace" style:
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/cruelty/long.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
30. "May the undertaker bury you, your table and your body, which has soiled the world,"
....I don't think he likes us....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
33. Sounds like he's trying to start WW3.
Edited on Sun Oct-03-10 10:12 PM by roamer65
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC