Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FCC Chairs: Politics, Not Policy, Extended Newspaper/Broadcast Combo Ban

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-10 07:23 PM
Original message
FCC Chairs: Politics, Not Policy, Extended Newspaper/Broadcast Combo Ban
Source: Broadcasting & Cable

Former FCC Chairman Reed Hundt says the Comcast/NBCU merger is a vertical one and doesn't see any problems with it; former FCC Chairman Michael Powell says the Supreme Court has been "irresponsible" in not giving the FCC more guidance on indecency enforcement; and former Chairman Kevin Martin says his one policy regret is not getting to do more about cable's prices and bundling of service.

And they all agree that the only reason the FCC did not get rid of broadcast-newspaper crossownership rules was politics, since the all agreed they ought to go. Powell said the market was corrupted by those political calculations and their impact on outcomes.

Those were just some of the observations from the three, gathered for a roundtable discussion for C-SPAN's Communicators series (http://www.c-span.org/series/communicators.aspx).

Read more: http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/458233-FCC_Chairs_Politics_Not_Policy_Extended_Newspaper_Broadcast_Combo_Ban.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-10 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Que?
Since when does anyone not already corrupted by our fascist state not "see any problem" with a vertical monopoly? Those have always been anathema to the American way of life ever since the trust busting days of Standard Oil and Paramount Pictures.

Also, why decry the inability to eliminate the broadcast-newspaper crossownership rules? The watering down they've already had done to them is also anathema to the American way of life. There should be more diversity in media ownership, not less. Yes, that may have been "politics," but any such decision should be. Otherwise, the bushbots in the FCC would have eliminated them entirely, making even more of what is in the media subservient to the anti-american values of Murdoch and his ilk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. The country is going to fiscal hell and people want to
slap fines on people for having short skirts, not wearing shirts, pants too low, bathing suits too sexy. NOW THIS IS WHAT IS THE REASON THE TEA BAGS EXIST TO PROMOTE DECENCY. Next think women will wear burkas and veils and men will have to wear robes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-10 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. The real "indecency" is the fact that Republican Money controls our media...
..the FCC is in shambles. Bill Clinton signed media de-regulation in 1996 at the behest of his Republican friends and devastated radio/TV and any chance of a fair news reporting in the United States.

What we have today is no better (and probably not as good) as Pravda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-10 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. +1
Thus far, the current administration seems (at best) disinterested in this.

Maybe after Democrats have their asses handed to them, that will change- but I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC