|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
alp227 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 06:34 PM Original message |
Holder Says U.S. Would Enforce Ban on Pot in California |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well, that is what he says now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-16-10 04:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
63. If it looks like Krakatoa, you have too many seeds in the bong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
2. Well, good luck with that, Eric.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
3. It is a federal law that must be changed by the U.S. Congress... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 06:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Yeah, he's gotta say that, but I hope they really don't expend too much energy on it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speppin (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-16-10 02:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
59. Seems to me Holder will flex his muscle........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
24. That's what I think....they have to support federal law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-16-10 06:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
64. Holder already said they wouldn't go after medical marijuana. So thats not it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lance_Boyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-18-10 10:18 AM Response to Reply #3 |
79. Actually, no. It's a controlled substance scheduling issue for the Feds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
4. from my cold, dead hands, copper.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:41 PM Response to Reply #4 |
27. That's funny! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. That ban has been a roaring success so far Eric! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FirstLight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
7. fuck him.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jerseyjack (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
8. Learn about jury nullification |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:17 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Cheers for "Jury Nullification" --- !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:21 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Good luck getting through voir dire with that idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 08:16 PM Response to Reply #16 |
37. Was there an official question ... or did you volunteer the info ... ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 10:40 PM Response to Reply #37 |
46. Prosecutor danced around it for like 8 minutes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-16-10 01:24 PM Response to Reply #46 |
57. Thanks -- good job -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clixtox (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 03:47 AM Response to Reply #57 |
72. I served on a jury that deadlocked 11 to 1 for convictions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 08:17 AM Response to Reply #72 |
74. Yep, that's how you do it. Never apologize, never explain, just vote your conscience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-18-10 12:30 AM Response to Reply #72 |
77. Congratulations ..... Think "12 Angry Men" should be a constant reminder to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iowa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
9. Of course they will. We wouldn't expect anything else from the Obama administration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueCollar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
11. Secession....? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:16 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Wouldn't mind seeing CA and DC sending a case this one to Supreme Court ... !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blasphemer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 08:07 PM Response to Reply #14 |
33. It would be very interesting indeed... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
30. We can only dream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
12. Holder will make the administration look like idiots if he does that .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bloomington-lib (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
13. What else can he say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. How do you defend attacking people who need medical marijuana....??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bloomington-lib (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:55 PM Response to Reply #19 |
31. WTF are you talking about? Who am I defending and why does it seem you are always attacking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 08:14 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. HOLDER is attacking medical marijuana users .... !!! What's wrong with you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bloomington-lib (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 08:29 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. Man you need to calm down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 08:36 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Read your post ... beginning with "WTF" and this one ... then take a Valium .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 03:27 AM Response to Reply #13 |
68. LOL. Follow the link in the OP and read the article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
17. Dear Eric Holder: Kiss my ass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 11:02 PM Response to Reply #17 |
49. 2nd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
18. Discussed here this afternoon with 35 Recs: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scuba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
20. Eric, the criminals are found on Wall Street and in the.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:30 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. K&R -- and Gold Stars!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swilton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:33 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Not to mention in the Bush Administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
21. We also have the "War-Profit" syndrome at play here, a la "War on Cancer" ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
25. But he pardoned convicted criminal Ted "bridge to nowhere" Stevens, and the Bush crime family!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
In Truth We Trust (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
26. Democracy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Owl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
28. Idiot. Is this a priority? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:49 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Even if it has to be defended, I don't believe it has to be as.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
32. Oh, so now everybody here all of a sudden supports States Rights? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bloomington-lib (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 08:11 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. I think in this case it's supporting giving rights to people as opposed to taking them away in cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 08:14 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. I was just joking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 11:05 PM Response to Reply #32 |
51. I've always supported state's rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
38. The Feds are on the wrong side of history with this issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blacksheep214 (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 11:15 PM Response to Reply #38 |
52. The will of the people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-16-10 11:17 AM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Great analogy! And exactly what I was thinking! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blacksheep214 (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
39. Hey Holder! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
42. Hey Holder, you asshole - remember Obama's directive on MMJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earcandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
43. And why would that be when there is violence in Mexico and husband's bodies to recover over drugs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blacksheep214 (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 09:15 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Try explaining this simple thing Holder! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 03:15 AM Response to Reply #44 |
67. Yes Holder is fucking stoopid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mr_liberal (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
45. I dont know why he would announce this now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 10:46 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. +1 DING-DING-DING. What the fuck is he thinking? Also, I have one comment for you: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blacksheep214 (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 10:50 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. This could be interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oldenuff (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 03:08 AM Response to Reply #45 |
66. What a joke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 07:06 AM Response to Reply #66 |
73. There's enough outrage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 02:25 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. When's the last time you heard of someone OD'ing on weed? or Killing someone with a car under |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 03:36 AM Response to Reply #45 |
69. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 03:39 AM Response to Reply #45 |
70. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-15-10 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
50. Typical. and disgusting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-16-10 01:56 AM Response to Original message |
53. This from the asshole who's defending DADT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-16-10 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
54. This Week In New Security State News. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-16-10 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
56. Meanwhile Schwarzenegger signs marijuana decriminalization bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
and-justice-for-all (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-16-10 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
58. sad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-16-10 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
60. Have we heard anything from the ueber-right about states' rights? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomhayes (476 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-16-10 03:01 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. On the other hand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-16-10 03:29 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. I agree with your point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-16-10 06:39 PM Response to Reply #61 |
65. How can you see this precedent as setting the stage for that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 03:41 AM Response to Original message |
71. Got priorities? Got timing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
75. prosecute marijuana laws in California even if state legalizes? sounds like Obama's crew! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-18-10 12:45 AM Response to Reply #75 |
78. Ya got that right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmosh42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-18-10 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
80. The "Fake" AG! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-18-10 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
81. It is time for us to DEMAND |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 17th 2024, 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC