Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WikiLeaks should be declared 'enemy combatants', says Fox News contributor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 10:02 AM
Original message
WikiLeaks should be declared 'enemy combatants', says Fox News contributor
Source: Guardian UK

Christian Whiton says whistleblowing website presents serious challenge to national security after leak of Iraq war logs

A Fox News contributor and former state department adviser has accused WikiLeaks of conducting "political warfare against the US" and called for those behind the whistleblowing website to be declared "enemy combatants" so they can be subjected to "non-judicial actions".

In an opinion piece on the Fox News site, Christian Whiton lambasts Congress and the White House for failing to tackle the leaking of hundreds of thousands of files about the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and demands action.

"First and foremost, it is important to understand that this is a serious challenge to our national security," he writes. "It's not about government transparency or free speech, which is the claim WikiLeaks and its leader, a certain Julian Assange, are making. Rather, this is an act of political warfare against the United States.

"WikiLeaks is a foreign organisation that obtained these documents as a result of espionage and it means to use the information to thwart and alter US policy. Mr Assange said as much himself."

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/oct/26/wikileaks-fox-iraq-war-logs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Political warfare?" For that, talk to the 'US' Chamber of Commerce
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hmm...I'm thinking that Fok Snus should be declared an enemy
combatant. Foreign ownership, and that sort of thing. Attempting to undermine American elections. Yeah...I think that's a helluva good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kgnu_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. FOX is enemy within operating to destroy American democracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Not surprising, with projection being what it is....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. which clearly illustrates the problem with the whole (bogus) idea of "enemy combatant"
Thank you FAUX Nazis for illustrating that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
14thColony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Actually the idea of "enemy combatants" is enshrined in Geneva Law
at least as far back as the 1949 conventions -- not that Wikileaks staff would even remotely fit the definition.

The actual problem here is these idiots have no idea that "combatant" - whether of the "enemy" or "lawful" type - is carefully defined in Geneva Law and is the catagory you WANT to be in if captured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Not since the neocons where in office. They expanded the definition and changed the context:

To Wit:

Prior to 2008, the definition was: "Any person in an armed conflict who could be properly detained under the laws and customs of war." In the case of a civil war or an insurrection the term "enemy state" may be replaced by the more general term "Party to the conflict" (as described in the 1949 Geneva Conventions Article 3).<3>

In the United States the use of the phrase "enemy combatant" may also mean an alleged member of al Qaeda or the Taliban being held in detention by the U.S. government as part of the war on terror. In this sense, "enemy combatant" actually refers to persons the United States regards as unlawful combatants, a category of persons who do not qualify for prisoner-of-war status under the Geneva Conventions. Thus, the term "enemy combatant" has to be read in context to determine whether it means any combatant belonging to an enemy state, whether lawful or unlawful, or if it means an alleged member of al Qaeda or of the Taliban being detained as an unlawful combatant by the United States.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_combatant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
14thColony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-10 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
26. Oh I know. That's the problem
They weren't happy with legal Geneva terms like "lawful combatant" or "priveleged combatant" because they had a hint of legitimacy to them. And while "unlawful combatant" doesn't exist as a GC term, the idea dates back to the 1950s in one form or another. But this whole "enemy combatant" notion, as your excerpt so well points out, is both stupid and meaningless, unless you want to use a farcical term as a means to further farcical prosecutions, which we did.

It seems from a law of armed conflict standpoint the US is on the verge of the greatest "streamlining" of Geneva law in over a century. The new US version seems to be "Whosoever shall oppose American will in any way, either in word or deed, shall be deemed unprivileged enemy combatants." There, that would sure make the Third Geneva Convention way less wordy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. I still remember in 2003 when the term was applied to
journalists who were not following the cheerleading storyline....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. With us or against us, was the phrase du jour
and to speak out in those days was to risk a quick ride to GITMO.

I'd rather we go back to the traditional usage, as appropriated by the Geneva Conventions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moostache Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. And Christian Whiton should be labelled a "war criminal".
If he wants to carry water for those who are responsible then he should share in their ultimate fate. While we may suffer through a lack of justice now for these atrocities, the verdict of history will not be kind to these bastards. Get in line with them Mr. Whiton...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. Pot calls kettle black.
Fox has done far more to endanger American lives here and abroad than WikiLeaks ever possibly could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe we'll consider it when
Bush, Cheney, et al are tried and convicted for war crimes and crimes against humanity because of this war.

Maybe, but I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. "BRING EM ON" shouted the AWOL CHIMPANZEE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Fox is ramping up their threats lately
think we'll ever fight back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. If we're talking about the fucked up USAmerikan Empire
Edited on Tue Oct-26-10 01:39 PM by ProudDad
and it's permanent war economy and national security state...

Under the loose definition pertaining in the corporate states of america...

I'm also an enemy combatant -- since 1964!

And I'm not the only one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. It ain't just faux-noise...the entire M$M is in on the hitjob...
Edited on Tue Oct-26-10 01:41 PM by ProudDad
Media Does Hit Job on WikiLeaks Founder After Iraq War Leak
Posted by Lauren Kelley on @ 11:14 am
Article printed from speakeasy: http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy
URL to article: http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/10/25/media-does-hit-job-on-wikileaks-founder-after-iraq-war-leak/

WikiLeaks released some 400,000 classified government documents over the weekend that shed light on many atrocities committed during our nation’s war with Iraq — widespread civilian death, torture and misleading body counts.

Naturally, WikiLeaks’ founder, Julian Assange, has been feeling the heat in the wake of the release — but not from the government, as you might think. No, this time Assange is being smeared by the media, with various “establishment” outlets raising doubts about his mental health status and spreading tabloid-style rumors.

...

Intelligence community reporter Tim Shorrock took to his Twitter feed to astutely contrast Assange’s situation with that of Daniel Ellsberg, who leaked the Pentagon Papers in the early 1970s and was subsequently dragged through the mud by President Nixon and Henry Kissinger: “When Dan Ellsberg leaked Pentagon Papers, Nixon’s henchmen tried to destroy his reputation. Today w/Wikileaks & Assange, media does the job.”


http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/10/25/media-does-hit-job-on-wikileaks-founder-after-iraq-war-leak/#
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Aw, what kind of mental defective is unrec'ing this thread? (n/t)
Kick...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MX96391 Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. WikiLeaks is not a good organization.
I agree with Fox on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nostradammit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Pray, do tell -
Is it the fact that they are uncovering war crimes that disturbs you
or the fact that they are laying to waste the argument that we needed
to invade Iraq? Are those bad things in your estimation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I do not doubt that..
"I agree with Fox on this one."

I do not doubt that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MX96391 Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. I don't like Fox though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Duly noted
good-bye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. lol... Fox News is now the Nazi Channel
making their pathetic hit lists so whackos can do their dirty work, like stomping on defenseless women's heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kgnu_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. USA is in the bubble of FOX and you can see how bad it is only when you go outside the US
People in the US should travel to foreign countries more often.... We need to know the world better....isolation is not good thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nossida Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-10 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
27. WikiLeaks should be declared 'enemy combatants', says Fox News contributor
Edited on Wed Oct-27-10 03:37 AM by Nossida
Faux would declare Mother Teresa an enemy combatant for feeding the poor.
With a viewership of 2 million or so, that leaves 300million+ that won't
be bothered with such utter drivel. If all liberals, Progressive, would
turn them off and stop engaging in the constant baiting from them, and
just get on with rebuilding the Nation, the creature would shrivel and
vanish. Consider them a Non Issue, and set yourself free from the glockenspiel.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC