Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge denies Blago motion on guilty count

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-10 11:49 AM
Original message
Judge denies Blago motion on guilty count
Source: ABC News

October 27, 2010 (CHICAGO) (WLS) -- Judge James Zagel denied former governor Rod Blagojevich's motion for a judgment of acquittal, arrest of judgment or new trial on his conviction on Count 24, lying to the FBI.

Blagojevich was convicted on one of 24 counts in a corruption trial over the summer. He was found guilty on Count 24, that he made false statements to FBI. Blagojevich's defense team filed the motion shortly after the conviction.

The jury was hung on the other 23 counts in the corruption case. A re-trial is scheduled for April 20, 2011.

Read more: http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/politics&id=7748962
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Judge refuses to nullify Blagojevich conviction
Source: The Washington Post

CHICAGO -- A judge in Chicago has denied a motion to nullify the sole conviction of Rod Blagojevich returned by a jury at the ousted Illinois governor's first corruption trial.

In a two-page opinion filed Wednesday, U.S. District Judge James Zagel rejects defense claims that prosecutorial misconduct contributed to the guilty verdict against Blagojevich on the charge of lying to the FBI.

The judge says defense attorneys often blame the prosecutors' conduct when they are struggling to challenge a conviction based on law or fact.

Jurors convicted the ex-governor on one of 24 counts in August. He is set to be retried on the 23 deadlocked charges in April.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/27/AR2010102703670.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. wasting tax payer dollars on lynching mobs and false trumped up convictions. Glad the folks in
Chicago are not totally fooled by the shenanigans of their
corrupt officials. 

One count out of 24 is not bad.  I hope Blago appeals.  
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-10 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. "The shenanigans of their corrupt officials" would be Blago's actions--right?
He's a pig and our entire state is much better off with him impeached. While I really understand the desire to protect an elected Dem, this particular case is not the place for it. Not only is he as crooked as a dog's hind leg, he's batshit nuts along with it.

My biggest question is how much cash did some of those jurors in his first trial get paid for their not guilty verdicts...




Laura (who actually lives in Illinois)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. 
[link:www.democraticunderground.com/forums/rules.html|Click
here] to review the message board rules.
 
BillH76 Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Another trial? Blago has created his own personal ongoing hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC