Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking CNN: Mistrial Granted in the TYCO Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:15 PM
Original message
Breaking CNN: Mistrial Granted in the TYCO Case
Edited on Fri Apr-02-04 12:16 PM by Cush
on CNN & MSNBC, no link yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. The holdout juror just won the lottery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Mandate Here. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. The juror probably has a job lined up...
... at the next $ 2 million birthday bacchanal for Koslewski's (sic) wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. That whack job of a juror is one of his "peers" now
can you say gold-digger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. That juror should be investigated!
A reporter on NPR said she was seen making the "OK" sign to the defense attnys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red State Rebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. I'm suprised they put a retired lawyer on the panel...what a mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Another Bushevik walks
I've been following this story, and it reminds me of the John Gotti Jury Tampered Trials, the way it played out.

Kozlowski's goons got to someone with bribe or fear, IMHO. Naturally, DoJ wouldn't help even if the juror dared report it, because Bushevik Justice is 1940s Mississippi Justice and anyone not Bushevik are the (RACIAL EPITHET REDACTED)s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoMoreRedInk Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Was Kozlowski a Republican donor? What perks that brings.
It sure must be nice to be able to buy your way out of trouble whenever it occurs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
President Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
28. Big-time, major-league republican donor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. $600 Million vs. $38 THOUSAND (Martha)
Uh-huh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. And that was Martha's $38,000
The Tyco 600 mil was money that belonged to the stockholders.

Justice is a frigging JOKE..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. he doesn't walk... he still has to face trial...
a mistrial isn't a conviction, therefore this isn't a case of double jeopardy----he will be tried again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Sounds like they had him except for the holdout.
They will get him next time, especially if Shrub has left town by then. This is only a temporary pause, Koz can't be feeling good that he fooled no one but a little old lady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cspiguy Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. this is a dark day on many fronts...
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. omfg
try the bastard again!! these corporations literally get away with anything now...true example of how law applies to some and not others.

I should've studied business in college...the last authentic license to steal. I trust Wall Street even less than the GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. Holy SHIT eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. The judge said
"We must do this again sometime."

No joke. His attempt at humor.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeoConsSuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. And hopefully they will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red State Rebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I have no doubt there will be a retrial....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Disgrace
:mad::puke::mad::puke::mad::puke::mad::puke::mad::puke::mad::puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. If you've ever watched Law & Order...
and wondered if real NYC judges have a sense of humor; yes, some of them do. They've seen it all and then some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. Aw yes!
Ubi dubium ibi libertas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. "Runaway Jury"
Life imitates art.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. I want that woman's life torn apart for this theatrical stunt
every aspect of her life should be thrown out into the street for us all to see, since she puffed herself up with pride and importance and made herself the "star" of this trial. She needs to go down hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russian33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. I don't care...
I'm glad Martha is going behind bars...cause she hurt the little people...oh wait, she didn't? these guys did? WTF!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
21. Someone please get a link so I can get up to speed on this one. Thanks.
Edited on Fri Apr-02-04 01:05 PM by demdave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. here's one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Thanks. What was the "coercive letter" that the juror received?
They mentioned it and then there was no elaboration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
24. Staying true to form "JUST-US" is rooted in the court system
I never held any reservations about political lackeys appointed to judgeships. Really think they should send them to drama school first though, makes for better entertainment ;(



he headline in the July 22, 1871 edition of the New York Times screamed "Gigantic Frauds of the Ring Exposed." The story running under it was even more shocking. The people who had been hired to build the city's new courthouse -- the "forty thieves," as they came to be called -- were stealing money by the barrelful.

At a time when the average workman made a dollar a day, contractors had charged the city $400,000 for safes, $175,000 for carpets, and $7,500 for thermometers. Altogether, the courthouse had cost over $13 million -- or more than twice what the United State had paid for Alaska four years earlier!

But the leader of the "ring" -- William "Boss" Tweed -- was not so worried about the headlines. It was the cartoons that got to him. Drawn by Thomas Nast (the same cartoonist who first drew Santa Claus the way we picture him) and printed in Harper's magazine, they depicted Tweed as a vulture, and worse
(snip)
http://history1900s.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pbs.org%2Fwnet%2Fnewyork%2Flaic%2Fepisode3%2Ftopic6%2Fe3_t6_s2-tn.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chitown_Dem Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
26. Are there any legal professionals on here
Edited on Fri Apr-02-04 01:39 PM by Chitown_Dem
who think this looks like jury tampering? Some of the surface details make it appear that it is (based on the "ok" sign from this juror to the defense, etc.), but I'm not a lawyer and not familiar with the courts, so I'm no expert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. An inside job
ala Runaway Jury?

How much truth to that might there be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
President Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
27. campaign cash: Koz vs. Stewart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
31. Kozlowski stole from impoverished rural O'ahu
Among other things, Tyco was big into internet bandwidth. It so happens that an excellent place to land transpacific cables is on the west side of the island of O'ahu. This area, also known as the Wai'anae Coast after its largest town, is an impoverished, semi-rural area with a large Native Hawaiian population. Tyco had built a state-of-the-art control facility in Ma'ili, just south of Wai'anae. It could have meant the end of the "digital divide" on the Wai'anae Coast.

Then that lousy filthy dirty rat fink Kozlowski stole all of Tyco's money to throw his fancy birthday parties. Now the building is just sitting there empty by the side of Farrington Highway.

As a civilized society, Hawai'i doesn't have the death penalty -- but there are some well-known shark runs right near there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lucky777 Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
32. I'm a law professor . . .
so I can answer a few questions (although I teach business law and not criminal law).

Martha Stewart was charged in her individual capacity (not in the corporate capacity) and was tried in Federal Court by the US Government on charges of obstructing justice with regard to her own personal trades in ImClone. Her lawsuit was not a 'corporate' scandal. However the SEC has also brought a civil case against her that will start this fall for insider trading, but since it is a civil case the remedy is disgourgement of profit and not jail time.

These Tyco guys (Kozlowski and Swartz) are charged with corporate crime (looting the corporation via fraud) and were tried in State Court by the New York City attorney. They were charged with criminal looting and with stock manipulation.

So the allegations were different in the two cases.

The US gov has a long and pretty good success rate at white collar crime; NY City has a poor history of this. Bottom line: Martha faced tougher prosecution.

A mistrial has no serious legal effect beyond discouragement. The defendant is neither 'guilty' nor 'not guilty.' They can be tried once again. However, the short term effect is that they walk free until they are tried again. It is not a win or loss for either side in technical terms but it is considered a win for the defendant in reality since they are kept out of jail!

As a law prof, the Tyco case is more disturbing since the evidence was totally overwhelmingly against these guys. Martha's case was just plain weird -- she was charged with lying about insider trading yet she wasn't charged with insider trading at the time; and anyway, defendants lie constantly about where they were and what they were doing, and no one charges them with a crime for coming up with an alibi. Strange and almost surreal. It is true that she lied to the government and that is a nominal crime, so she should be fined or something light.

Law profs agree that Tyco was the more outrageous situation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. A legal analyst on MSNBC (former prosecute)
Said that the case may be 'aged'(i.e. wait a long time before a new trial) in order to 'refresh the jury pool'. One wonders if the state may not decide to forgo a new trial after this time has passed, as the memories of witnesses may no longer be reliable, and the public may have moved on to fresh outrages.

Call me cynical, but I see an excellent chance that this is as good as an acquittal for these Tyco people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. The underlying fact cannot be denied
If these were simple bank swindlers they would be in the slammer hard, but these political connected crooks demeans the honorable people practicing the profession of law. Gives them a real black eye to say the least. I can almost bet the prosucution started out on the weak side from the very begining. The little quip of the judge was quite telling.

The day before yesterday a lady died after smashing into the side of a errant truck while driving 70mph talking on her cell phone. (it concerned me because the truck came out of the motor pool I work out of) It was totally the truck drivers fault making a bone headed u-turn, but mostly in anything tragic, two or more parties often share in part of its making.

A day later, and just down the road they have a 78 vehicle accident in the fog on steep downhill and no body gets hurt in the whole thing. Attention and focus is critical, many of the people who should be paying attention are not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lucky777 Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. You're right -- the law treats white collar crime too easily
The law favors white collar crime and hates blue collar crime. It is a subtle form of racism. The evening news is full of stories about some guy on the west side of chicago who robbed a liquor store, but nothing on the billions stolen from ordinary people by white collar criminals.

The Savings and Loan scandal cost thousands to every man-woman-child in America (thanks to Bush's brother in part). Yet people go to jail for stealing a pizza.

As a lawyer, I am sickened by how these rich criminals surround themselves with lawyers to protect them, always proclaiming their innocence. I have more respect for drug dealers b/c at least they are offering a product!

There are good lawyers out there but they are few and far between. I left the practice to become a professor, but I see how my students just want to make $, they don't care how.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC