Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harry Reid: Election results show Americans want bipartisanship

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:30 PM
Original message
Harry Reid: Election results show Americans want bipartisanship
Source: Las Vegas Sun

The Senate race between Harry Reid and Sharron Angle was characterized by some of the most vitriolic, negative, mudslinging campaigning that took place during a 2010 midterms, marked by bitter divisions across the country. But by the morning after his win, Reid seemed to have forgotten all of that, boiling his promise for the future down to a single concept: bipartisanship.

"I think the main message that we should have received last night ... is that the people of Nevada and the American people want us to work together," he said.

... "Now it's time to get back to work, do what is needed to re-right the economy and create jobs," he said. "I'm hopeful and confident that when the dust settles that the Republicans will no longer want to stop everything and we'll work together."

Read more: http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/nov/03/harry-reid-election-results-show-americans-want-bi/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. That last sentence...that was kind of a sneaky jab, there. Good on you, Harry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Surely you jest.
I'm afraid Harry really believes that and means it sincerely ... it wasn't meant as a 'jab'.

One of the first signs that 2012 will be an even more devastating defeat for Democrats will be if Harry Reid does not give-up his Majority Leader position or isn't challenged for that position.

That Senate Democrats would let a guy like Reid stay on as their leader after presiding over such big election losses is, well, incomprehensible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
44. It may of been a jab ...
but it was too weak to land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. hard to get the party of NO to do anything - they were rewarded for doing nothing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Politics are crazy. Poor Harry. He is pathetic. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
50. He's WORSE than pathetic he's ABOMINABLE
What a Horse Turd

About to spend a BILLION or 2 to build an Embassy in Kabul

Grow a pair Ass wipe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. What is he smoking?
That is utter horseshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He's not dumb, he knows it is horseshit.
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 04:58 PM by emulatorloo
It is basically a "challenge" to the Republicans to stop acting like asshole babies. They aren't going to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Meaning he is, 'reaching out across the aisle'
He will only get burned again, and again, and again in the name of 'healing.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinymontgomery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. Insanity I think they call it
N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pasto76 Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bi-partisan means we get some, they get some. Not they get it all.
hope he understands that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Screw bipartisanship
It's come to mean, "We'll give you X and if you don't like it, you're not playing fair".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. +1...Amen. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. they got it all their way for the last 2 years!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. It shows Americans are forgetful idiots.
Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Americans do not want bipartisanship, that is like getting half a kid - it doesn't work.
This is a culture war sponsored by the owners of this country. As long as we are fighting each other then we won't notice them. And as long as we are getting half ass politics in the name of bipartisanship, then nothing changes for the owners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Republicans don't do bipartisanship
Harry knows that. It's time to grow a pair of balls Harry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CubicleGuy Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
41. To say nothing of homopartisanship
Republicans only do heteropartisanship.

Unless you catch them in the bathroom stall, doing the "wide stance" thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Publicly, they do heteropartisanship
But when they hit the clubs or the bedroom, it's AsslessLeatherChapsPartisanship
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. Uh...
alrighty then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One Fly Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. Watch it happen
These damn dims are going to help these fucking regressive pigs get whatever they want. Even bama is saying we need to work together. We are screwed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yay, for Bipartisanship!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's WAY to early to already be totally wrong about what the election meant.
:facepalm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. LOL.
"characterized by some of the most vitriolic, negative, mudslinging campaigning"

Makes me think of this:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. WTF? WTF is the color of the sky in your world, Harry?
I am happy he beat that crazy bat woman Angle... Sad to have to say it. They're practically the same organism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. you don't fucking get it!!!...Dems lost because the base is saying just the opposite of that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. and all the winning Repubies are all saying "We don't owe anybody anything and we are repealing ..
Obama's bills"...what part of this do you not understand Harry?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. Of course, Reid "gets it" -- but they need to keep moving to the right....
that's simply the excuse line ....

All evidence now and always says its insane, but they can get away with it

and they will!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. Harry Reid should not be the senate leader going into next year.
He is simply not up to the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skepticscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
23. Could he possibly be more of a surrender monkey?
The new House isn't even seated and he's already waving the white flag, ready to roll over for whatever the Repugs want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. "bipartisanship" means serving the puppet masters...
Just sayin'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
25. Or maybe they wanted to purge some Blue Dogs
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
47. So instead of purging Blue Dogs during the primaries,
the Democratic voters waited until the general election and voted for the teabaggers.

A winning strategy since 1980.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
26. Now, lets see what actually happens filibuster changes.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArcticFox Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
27. What he means of course
Now, instead of pretending to be stymied in their efforts to do anything by "the party of no", democrats can pretend they are being bullied into passing whatever republicans propose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catrose Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
29. GOOD GRIEF
Sounds familiar, like "He'll never hit me again. He promised."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gamey Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
31. Those leopard repubs will change their spots this time!
I just know it! Well, I hope they do. They have to. The Americans voted for bipartitanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bergie321 Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
33. They just don't get it
If we wanted MORE compromises, we wouldn't have voted out all of the Blue Dogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
34. Do Republicans want bipartisanship?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
35. God help us . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
36. No one EVER really wants bipartisanship on either side.
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 08:43 PM by hughee99
People want agreement on doing what THEY want done. The level of "bipartisanship" is the level to which they will agree to begrudgingly horse-trade a policy they like for one they don't. If you're voting for a person because they can "get along" rather than get things done, you're not voting for someone who's going to represent your interests. Politicians who say "the people want bipartisanship" either don't know what the people want, or they're lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prana69 Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
37. You've got to be fucking kidding me?
After two years of "bipartisanship", you get your Democratic ass handed to you on a platter, and you come to the conclusion that the people want MORE bipartisanship?

Holy fuck Batman! I mean jayzuz h! What is wrong with this guy?

People don't want bipartisanship. They want leaders who will make strong legislative decisions and drive them to resolution.

We're screwed.

As a previous poster said, at least now Harry has someone to blame for his failures.

P69
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nradisic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
38. NOOOOOO!!!!!!!
Jesus Christ! How fucking useless is Harry Reid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
39. Jesus, Harry. Really?
fucking moron
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
40. that's right, Harry, bend over
that's what Americans want. That's all we get, since the dems won't fight for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
43. Uh, unh--I don't think so!
That was the cry at the end of the 2000 election, when he country pretty much halved the country with that same old shit about uniting the country. For those who can remember, that was one of Bush's first "jokes" about being the great "uniter."

ANYONE who uses that word under the kind of conditions that exist now is a liar and an ineffectual leader. If Harry Reid thinks that it's going to happen now really IS living in fantasyland.

To be perfectly honest, I was hoping Reid would win, just to keep the nutcase Angle from acquiring his seat. I have no delusions that Reid will do anything different than what he's done all along, and I sincerely wish we could get a new Senate Majority Leader, someone who can bring some passion into the job, and isn't afraid to stand up to the nasties on the far right, and the less far right.

It'll be a cold day in hell, though, when we finally have the leadership we need in the Senate.

As far as Pelosi is concerned, I have to admit I still have a beef with her about the "tabling" of impeachment against Bush and Cheney. Those basyards should be in jail, not writing their memoirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marasinghe Donating Member (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
45. sorry harry; this is why you never made it big as a boxer ....
and will never make it as a successful senate majority leader - you ain't a fighter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
46. great, now he's MORE delusional than his erstwhile rival nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
48. Bipartisanship = Shove shit on Democratic faces
"Please sir, I want some more"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
49. Yeah, Harry, the Republicans
will work together if you do everything they want. True bipartisanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
51. It shows that lots of Americans can't be bothered to vote in midterms
The elections aren't a frickin sudden unexpected surprise either: if the last digit of the frickin year is even and if you aren't frickin braindead, then you pretty much frickin know there's a frickin election in November

It's not that frickin hard, either, to spend a few hours researching the races, then put down the frickin bag of cheezits and get off the frickin couch into your frickin car and drive a few frickin blocks to the polling station and do your frickin duty as a citizen. The whole frickin thing can't take more than about 0.07% of your waking hours in those two years: it's a frickin average of less than a frickin minute a day



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
52. Um, you're wrong Harry, and it's why you almost lost...
...this was a vote against you NOT doing what YOU SAID you would do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
53. meh, so what else is new?
Oh Harry, let's face it, you won because your opponent was a fucking racist halfwit.

Perhaps Harry needs to look up the definition of insane again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
54. Because we are divided, Harry will give us the worst of both worlds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
55. Voters said, "We're going to keep throwing out incumbents until one of you batches of Bozos does
something good for ordinary people. And, no, trickle down isn't going to cut it."


(No offense to Bozo intended.)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC