Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WEB EXCLUSIVE: Fired New York Times editor tells all

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rawstory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 04:16 PM
Original message
WEB EXCLUSIVE: Fired New York Times editor tells all
Full story at http://www.rawstory.com

Fired New York Times editor tells all

Raines slams culture of 'complaint;' Apologizes for moving too fast

By John Byrne
RAW STORY EDITOR

Former New York Times Executive Editor Howell Raines, who resigned in the wake of the Jayson Blair plagiarism scandal, has written a 23-page confessional in the month's edition of the Atlantic.

Raines, who had a 25-year run with the Times, took the helm Sept. 5, 2001, just six days before Sept. 11. His tenure as editor, which was pockmarked with accusations that he was too aggressive, ended abruptly after the paper published a four-page spread on the reportorial falsifications of staff writer Jayson Blair.

In his extensive piece, Raines reconstructs his long career with the paper, detailing his relationships with previous editors and explaining his attempts to control what he called the paper's "culture of complaint." He describes a newspaper riven by a divide of effort, where many of the paper's journalists slip into an apathy which undermines the Times' ability to stay ahead of the news.

"At the Times," he writers, "as at Harvard, it is hard to get in and almost impossible to flunk out."

Notably absent from the article is details surrounding the Blair case itself; Raines makes mention of Blair's case only towards the end of the piece. Most of his time is spent breaking down what he sees as the nearly intractable problems with the Times newsroom.

Raines slams the Times' powerful writer's guild, which, he says, encourages a climate of indifference within the paper.

"On a newsroom floor with 1,200 employees and an even larger, militantly pro-Guild support staff, where the company is the daddy and the union is the mommy, no one is supposed to speak publicly about the attitudes of entitlement and smug complacency that pervade the paper."

"Clubabble underachievers," he adds, "are usually given sinecures rather than encouraged to leave."

He calls attention to what he sees as one of the paper's biggest challenges — to eradicate the idea that the Times can afford to be lazy in covering breaking stories because its eventual article will be better.

To survive, he argues, the Times must shed its "Victorian affectation" and "New York parochialism, to eschew a "glide path towards irrelevance."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Mouthpiece of the establishment.
Raines' thoughts on the Times' office culture are probably required reading for about two hundred Ivy League careerists. The rest of us could happily give a fuck less.

The obsequious newspaper he oversaw is at least as responsible for the lies of the Bush administration--which it dutifully burnished and couriered, seven days a week--for the U.S. being in Iraq.

How does it feel to have been the biggest whore of all, Howell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC