Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ecuador president says no offer to WikiLeaks chief

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 09:20 PM
Original message
Ecuador president says no offer to WikiLeaks chief
Source: AP


QUITO, Ecuador – Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa on Tuesday dismissed an offer of residency that a lower level official made to the embattled founder of the online whistle-blower WikiLeaks.

The offer by Deputy Foreign Minister Kintto Lucas on Monday "has not been approved by Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino — or the president," Correa told reporters.

Patino already had indicated earlier in the day that the leftist government was backing away from providing refuge for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, saying it "will have to be studied from the legal and diplomatic perspective."

Lucas had said Monday that Ecuador was open to giving Assange residence "without any kind of trouble and without any kind of conditions."



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101201/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/lt_ecuador_wikileaks_founder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. That was fast, running out of friends quickly(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Funny thing about this...
...is, I think in an odd way it is beginning to backfire in a certain way.

Even many nations whom are somewhat adversarial towards the US don't seem particularly pleased with what Assange has done. Hell, I think even countries like Iran and North Korea aren't happy with these releases. Iran may have known full well that virtually the entire Arab would was conspiring with the US (and Israel) to stop their nuclear weapons program, but now the Iranian people know it too. North Korea may have known China was tiring of their antics, but I imagine it is a bit disconcerting for them to discover that several high level Chinese diplomats are already planning for a unified Korean Peninsula under Seoul's flag.

Those chortling and giggling that "the empire" got its nose bloodied a bit may be increasingly finding they are more alone in their joy than they may have expected.

I think many people have the mistaken belief that the world could do without the United States and the diplomacy it conducts. In a way, this is proving just the opposite. Not only does much of the world value US diplomacy, it actually depends on it.

If US influence wanes, someone else will rise to fill the void. It doesn't appear to me that most countries want to rock the boat and are content with the US acting as the stabilizing force in the world. Most countries seem to understand the important role of US diplomacy, and anything that makes it more difficult appears to be largely frowned upon.

Only idiots want all the worlds dirty laundry aired, and only fools want to make diplomacy and discussion amongst nations harder than it already is.

The real world isn't Fight Club.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. agreed n/t
s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. ditto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The real world is a far away place to many here
no concept of reality so no real intellectual way to oppose it. Amerikka and the empire are just a shortcut to saying something. What that is, they dont really know.

They never think about what will replace the system they dislike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yes, there are many with no stake in society at all..
They cheer to overturn the current order, mostly because they have built nothing within it.

"They never think about what will replace the system they dislike."

These are dreamers, people living in a fantasy world. Those that refuse to see reality and instead exist in lalaland. They think they hate the "system" but know little of history and have no clue that what follows could be even worse. There are many of these types here. Just this year, people who will refuse to believe the GOP was about to win a crushing victory even when all polling evidence pointed to such an outcome. The very same people who yak about revolution and fail to understand that if the economy seriously deteriorates, and considering we have a Democratic President, that revolution may in fact come from the right and be a nightmare beyond all our wildest imaginations.

Hell, there are people here who think Cuba is a democracy, that marxism is a great economic system if only we "did it right", and that the "Amerikkan empire" is the greatest evil in the world.

You can't intellectually argue with these people and hope to change their minds, but many people mostly just read the comments and arguments and may never hardly post at all - or even have an account. It is still worth making rational points as more people read them than you may think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. More infantilizing talking points?
Some of us are actually much more well informed and much more intelligent than you give credit for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. LOL. The United States is not a stablizing force in the world. That's a myth.
and frankly, it sounds akin to what wife beaters say to justify their violence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. I've enjoyed some of the leaks so far. did you see this one???
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101201/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/lt_venezuela_wikileaks

The latest documents posted online by El Pais reveal meticulous reporting by American diplomats on subjects from Venezuela's health care system to the government seizure of several banks.

They also describe U.S. officials' concerns that embassy staff were being spied on.

A secret memo dated Jan. 28, 2010, discussed a biannual counterintelligence meeting "to review current threat levels and countermeasures." It says that the embassy faced a high espionage threat and that officials discussed the need for strict security policies, including in the use of BlackBerry phones.

The memo said U.S. officials believed tht Venezuelan intelligence agencies "are controlled by the Cuban Intelligence Service" and that they "have the capability, means and desire to monitor and target Embassy staff."

In other released documents, U.S. diplomats said they believed there are leftist rebels in Cuba belonging to the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC. And they said that in one private conversation in November 2009, Brazilian Defense Minister Nelson Jobim "all but acknowledged presence of the FARC in Venezuela."

According to an earlier memo from the U.S. Embassy in Brasilia in February 2008, Jobim told then U.S. Ambassador Clifford Sobel "that the Brazilian government shared the Ambassador's concern about the possibility of Venezuela exporting instability."

It added that Jobim "believed that President Chavez has been saber rattling to distract from internal problems," but he also advised the U.S. diplomat "that isolating Venezuela would lead to further posturing from Chavez and a greater risk of spreading instability among neighboring countries."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. LOL. Yeah, right,
The United States is afraid Venezuela will export instability!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. In short
Ain't no-one likes the ugly truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. Well put
Why would any government offer him santuary - he has no allegiences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm sure that took all of about one telephone call to retract. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. No kidding
Something along the lines of "Hey, nice <insert foreign aid program here>. A SHAME if anything happened to it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. someone is going to lose his job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. If he keeps up he will be that "man w/o a country"..well maybe Antarctica.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. Say it ain't so, Rafa!
Your leftist credentials are at stake if you rescind the invitation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnakeEyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think another reason is that...
No country wants to be hosting him when espionage charges are filed against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Typical. The Ecuadorean government can reverse course faster
than an Olympic athlete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FinGovi Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
19. Hey Rafael,
when you were in trouble, the world came to your defense. Y ahora estas diciendo que eso era una falta! Support Mr. Assange and give him asylum. Si no, entonces eres igual a los otros que maltratan el mundo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
20. Simply put, the US threatened to cut off banana imports.
Ecuador is the worlds largest exporter of bananas. The US is one of it's largest markets.

The state dept probably said, "okay, you want to give him a home, well, I think we can explain away a cut in bananas as a price saving measure, what do you think?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. is that what happened? n/t
s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. More than likely, because, I believe, Ecuador doesn't have an
Edited on Wed Dec-01-10 11:44 AM by Javaman
extradition policy with the US.

So something behind the scenes went on to squeeze them where it hurts.

Bananas was just the first and obvious thing that came to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Your really just making this up aren't you?
I mean, isn't it just as likely that Deputy Foreign Minister Kintto Lucas shot off at the mouth and said something utterly stupid, and then Correa stepped in, slapped said official down and corrected the record?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. we are all making this up on our best assumptions.
just like you making it up that you think the foriegn minister shot his mouth off.

no one really knows.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC