Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Democrats line up to oppose Obama tax deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:54 AM
Original message
Senate Democrats line up to oppose Obama tax deal
Source: Politico


Several Senate Democrats on Tuesday morning criticized the White House and Republican tax deal, saying that President Barack Obama gave up too much to a recalcitrant opposition party.

The initial pushback suggests that the White House will have to woo a handful of reluctant Senate Democrats to back the wide-ranging compromise in order to get the measure over the finish line before the tax cuts expire at year’s end. And as Republicans are poised to gain new power in the House and Senate next year, Democrats are worried that Obama will be eager to leave them behind in order to advance legislation that draws significant GOP backing.


“I still seemed puzzled with the president’s enthusiasm and the Republicans giving an income tax break for people that make over a $1 million,” said Louisiana Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu. “It’s very discouraging that we are actually borrowing $46 billion to apply an income tax relief to individuals and families earning more than $1 million.”

Landrieu added: “But why the president thought he had to give in on this? Why he didn’t have the confidence in a Democratic Caucus to hold the line? I don’t know.”

Asked what he thought about the deal, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) said: “Not much. You asked what I think of it? Not much.”

Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) said she needed “to hear about the consequences of this.”





Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1210/46074.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is interesting - with both Dems AND Reps willing to buck the bosses. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
64. Senate Dem's, House Progressives, House Blue Dogs and Tea-Partiers
all oppose this.

Too bad this isn't a Democracy or we wouldn't be having this problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sen. Mary Landrieu
She is right but I find this to be beyond "discouraging". I prefer the word DISGUSTING. We add another $46 billion to the deficit and we cannot even help the neediest among us that are just trying to exist on next to nothing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. She has no room to comment.
“I still seemed puzzled with the president’s enthusiasm and the Republicans giving an income tax break for people that make over a $1 million,” said Louisiana Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu.

She's puzzled? She is one of the DINOs consistently not backing Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. No kidding.
I'm puzzled that she actually said that. I'm shocked, actually, and pleasantly shocked for a rare change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. exactly
I was surprised by HER comments. Who knew??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. surprised she didn't think it was a good idea
given her record! :mad:

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #21
61. Especially since she voted for the cuts in the first place.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #61
66. Ring this bell.
Edited on Wed Dec-08-10 04:42 PM by RUMMYisFROSTED
Landrieu VOTED for the Chimp tax cuts!


:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
62. She's looking for a deal sweetener, one vote for sale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why don't THEY work on their Republican colleagues then?
Are they so powerless in the body they got elected to?

Why don't THEY help get a more favorable deal? Are they just sitting around waiting for the POTUS to do it? He's not even a Senator and THEY are!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. That's funny? so you think they have no power at all?
They should just sit around waiting for the POTUS to do it?

That would certainly make us powerless too.

The concept of the Presidency as an all powerful place is getting rather sad around here. So Senators are just place holders? They can do nothing either (and I suppose we the people can really do nothing at all).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Straw person much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. The sausage factory is kicking into gear
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 12:01 PM by BeyondGeography
Problem is, opponents of the compromise on both sides are going to want concessions. How all that gets reconciled will be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Filibuster!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billlll Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. OPPOSE the compromise. No tax cuts!
Stand firm .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Could this have been the plan all along? Save face for the POTUS but
have the tax cuts fail later in the Senate. I'm grasping at straws I know. I'm thrilled the unemployed are getting a break, that worried me. Perhaps this is the plan..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. No, Timmeh wanted this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
38. Our taxes go up we loose the house. If faced with Obama faced in deciding, I would rather the middle
class get something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. The death of a country for many. Where will we be in another 10 years or so with
this type of logic. This is a ripoff and Americans should be up in arms. Forget "we" the people, it's now "we" the wealthy. Imagine where generations of youth will be in this country, eventually. Their future will likely be dismal. IMO I'm watching the democratic party unravel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ha - The Senate is why we've had all the problems we've had. If the friggin Senate could pass
what Obama and Democrats had campaigned on then we wouldn't have a problem.

The Senate is why we've had to compromise on everything from Stimulus to HCR to FinReg.

Give me a f#$king break from anyone in the Senate bitching about how anything has turned out. The House passed it. The President would sign it. The f#$king Senate is who can't make it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. Now is the time to push them to filibuster and oppose this crappy deal! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disillusioned73 Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hold the line... maybe it's our parties turn to say no
:dem: it seems to have worked for the other side, so :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Having to embarrass a President of your own Party is tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moostache Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. BULLSHIT - not when that president is embarassing the party's values!!!
If Obama can't take the heat, he should stop spitting on campaign promises and calling it something else...
Stop dropping to his knees every time a Republican says "Boo!"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disillusioned73 Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. Embarrassing yes, but absolutely necessary..
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. That's a pretty tepid "pushback"
why do I get the sick feeling that they're just going to be pushed OVER in the end? "I don't know" 'not much" "I need to hear the consequences of this" (HEY-LOOK AT THE YEARS SINCE THE TAX BREAKS TOOK EFFECT!) the spine free zone remains intact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bc3000 Donating Member (766 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. When you're to the right of Landrieu, you may as well just call yourself a republican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Obama's alleged compromise is right of many Republicans, even cons like Scarborough.
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 12:30 PM by No Elephants
Timmeh Geithner, a registered Republican until Obama wanted to appoint him, and Kissinger's pal.


He feared a double dip recession and stayed true to his Republican principles of "You don't raise taxes on ANYone during a recession, even those whose annual salary is a million a year or more."

Obama didn't cave to Senate Rethugs. He agreed with his Rethug Sec of Treas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
63. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. KNR! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moostache Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. I will donate to the re-election campaigns of EVERY Senator to oppose Obama on this.
I am already refusing to donate any funds to an Obama re-election campaign, so any money that I would have given to his campaign is now available to the Democratic Senators that show the guts to do what's right and to stand on principles!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
perdita9 Donating Member (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
23. Earth to Mary Landrieu!
Why didn't Obama have faith in a Democratic Caucus?

Are you freaking serious??? The Congress, with big Dem majorities, has been an embarrasment of not being able to get their sh!t together. Ben Nelson? Joe Lieberman? There are any number of unreliable turncoats in your ranks.

Want to impress the progressives? Get enough of your colleagues together and filibuster the damn bill. You have the power, let's see you use it.

Or more likely, let's just watch you fold and then you, like the GOP, will blame everything on Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bc3000 Donating Member (766 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. Good point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. Kill the Deal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julian09 Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
26. A the very least make tax cuts for under 250k permanant
and higher temporary, then cave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. I like that
Decoupling was the least we could do, IMO. Probably a deal breaker for McBoehner though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bc3000 Donating Member (766 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. I disagree
It seems to me, given the deficit/debt situation, the only rational justification for the extension of tax cuts is as a temporary stimulus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bongbong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
32. Interesting who opposed the tax cuts
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 01:39 PM by bongbong
At least one DINO (Landrieu) were included in the opposition.

It's more evidence for the whack-a-mole theory of legislator voting patterns. "You vote yes on this one, I'll vote no. On the next one, we'll switch. That way, us fat cats with a D behind our names can keep giving lip service to Democratic principles but the votes will never quite be enough to actually pass them."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. We should be taking names of those supporting this -- !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
36. All Dems should be bucking this -- what the hell is Obama doing...???
We're now going to borrow more money from China to continue tax breaks

for the RICH????

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
t0dd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
39. Mary Landrieu: 'Obama-McConnell Plan' Is 'Almost Morally Corrupt'
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 11:42 PM by t0dd
Source: Huffington Post

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Mary Landrieu, a conservative Democratic from Louisiana, lashed out Tuesday at President Obama's deal with congressional Republicans that allows tax cuts for the wealthy to be extended for two years.

Extending the tax cuts for those making more than a million dollars a year is borderline immoral, Landrieu charged. "I'm going to argue forcefully for the nonsensicalness and the almost, you know, moral corruptness of that particular policy," said Landrieu, walking into a meeting with Vice President Joe Biden and Senate Democrats. "This is beyond politics. This is about justice and doing what's right."

Landrieu was fuming about the deal. On her way into the meeting, she slammed the tax-cut extension as a needless giveaway, adding, "That's all I have to say." But it wasn't. She emerged from the meeting a few moments later to continue prosecuting her case to reporters.

"It's what I'm calling the Obama-McConnell plan. We're going to borrow $46 billion from the poor, from the middle class, from businesses of all sizes basically to give a tax cut to families in America today, that despite the recession, are making over a million dollars. I mean, this is unprecedented. Unprecedented. I want to repeat that," she said. Landrieu added, however, that she had yet to make a decision on the final package and was speaking strictly about the extension of tax cuts for the wealthy.

...

Landrieu put today's tax-cut debate in the context of the poverty and joblessness facing African Americans across the country. "The median net worth of African-American families -- net worth, not income -- in this country today, according to our census, is $5,000. You want me to repeat that? $5,000. So we are borrowing money from constituencies, and large segments of the population like this," said Landrieu. "I want you all to get your heads around this."

Obama had allies in the Senate who would have fought the extension of the tax cuts, Landrieu said, if only he had relied on them. "Why the president didn't think there were forty or fifty or sixty of us to defend him on this principle, I don't know, but he basically didn't think anybody of us cared much about it. Well, I want him to know I do care."

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/07/mary-landrieu-obamamcconn_n_793272.html



Even though she is a hypocrite (since she voted for tax cuts for the rich in 2001), we can certainly reflect on the somber truth of what she says.. that this deal is nothing more than a reverse Robin Hood
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. No "almost" about it. That said...
Fuck you Landrieu!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. She's delusional. Wasn't she there when the vote failed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young but wise Donating Member (760 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. +1
Twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. Corrupt. Indefensible. Obscene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. Then I guess the Senate should've passed the middle class only tax cut, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #39
45. There's one to back Sanders' filibuster
Hopefully, there will be more
I don't care why they do it. I just hope they do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Why can't they just hold the vote again for the measure that failed, now that
they're all rabid about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. Because it would still fail
We have a situation where one edge is unwilling to accept a 40/60 loss, and the other is unwilling to accept anything less than a 100/0 win. I guess we will find out if the 2 ends of the spectrum are able to accomplish a united goal even though though they have hugely different reasoning.

I doubt they can. But if they can, even if I do not agree with either grouping, I would find it to be a hugely positive sign for the ability of our democracy to survive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #45
53. Notice it's Sanders standing between us and this latest Obama deal .... !!!
Thank you, Bernie!!

How about running for President on the Dem ticket??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #39
47. If you get a chance catch Lawrence O'Donnell tonight or
try to get a transcript on line. He pretty much took her statement apart and her hidden agenda behind it. Pretty interesting and pretty damning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. She voted for the Bush tax cuts...
so she should shut the fuck up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #39
48. Will she support Bernie's filibuster?


:kick:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #48
51. She claims to be a democrat...
but almost always votes Repugnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #39
52. Quite something coming from Landrieu -- but she's correct ... !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #39
54. what the hell got her all pissed off?
could she be worried about getting reelected....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #39
55. Mary is a morally corrupt asshole hypocrite...
who can now be "real" now that she doesn't have to worry about re-election.

The deal isn't a complete "reverse Robin Hood" in that the tax cuts were extended for everyone and also that it gained the extension of unemployment benefits among other things that generally help the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #39
56. Coming from this thing, the statement is laughable.
While she is right, she has no business talking about any legislation being "morally" corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Very_Boring_Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #39
57. I don't get the comments here
I'm no fan of Mary Landrieu, but did she say anything here that anybody disagrees with? Why all the hostility?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #57
59. She dares to criticize our Rulers!
Whom we must worship and dare not even think ill of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Second Stone Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #39
58. The woman is taking pot shots solely for public consumption
She never fought for anything for the poor and middle class that I can recall. Now that it is a done deal she is piling on Obama because it is popular. I'm not happy with this deal either, but Landrieu is an utter opportunist. If she votes against it, I reserve the right to change my mind, but she is just posturing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #58
65. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #39
60. This from Landrieu's mouth? OMG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC