Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Obama Weighing Broad Overhaul for Income Tax

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:15 PM
Original message
President Obama Weighing Broad Overhaul for Income Tax
Source: NY Times

President Obama is considering whether to push early next year for an overhaul of the income tax code to lower rates and raise revenues in what would be his first major effort to begin addressing the long-term growth of the national debt.

While administration officials cautioned on Thursday that no decisions have been made and that any debate in Congress could take years, Mr. Obama has directed his economic team and Treasury Department analysts to review options for closing loopholes and simplifying income taxes for corporations and individuals, though the study of the corporate tax system is farther along, officials said.

The objective is to rid the code of its complex buildup of deductions, credits and exemptions, thereby broadening the base of taxes collected and allowing for lower rates — much like a bipartisan majority on Mr. Obama’s fiscal commission recommended last week in its final blueprint for reducing the debt through 2020.

Doing so would offer not only an opportunity to begin confronting the growth in the national debt but also a way to address warnings by American business that corporate tax rates and the costs of complying with the tax code are cutting into their global competitiveness.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/10/us/politics/10tax.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. If it actually happens, why do I feel it will not benefit the middle class and the less fortunate?
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 09:18 PM by BrklynLiberal
Big IF..considering who comprises his "economic team"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. +10000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
45. Maybe you're paying attention.
And learning from experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
54. The middle class always gets hit
Every time they "overhaul" the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
62. History.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. About time - I hope it is a good plan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. After the last two years of Obama, you're still hoping for reform that won't benefit the elite/rich?
Wow --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. +1
Guaranteed that Alan Simpson gets a big tax break here. Families with modest deductions? Not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
67. It will go Nowhere
IE = Single Payer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
74. Tell me if you like it or you don't. Then I'll know if it's bad or good.
Respectively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. LOL
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Do you have any extra popcorn??
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. At this point.. I wish Mr. Obama wouldn't try and "Fix" anything more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. New tax rates = 1% for the wealthy, 90% for the rest of us.
Just watch ..... :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Exactly ... !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. +1000000000!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luciferous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
63. lol, so true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Amazing. It's even the same language Simpson and Bowles adopted.
Close loopholes (end or curtail middle and lower class deductions), lower rates (rich get a break that makes the current deal look like a socialist nightmare) and "simplify" (you lose thousands in itemizations but you pay your accountant a few dollars less. Awesome right!)

Plus the Washington elite seems to have fallen in love with giving themselves a massive tax break so I'm sure this plan will have plenty of fans in the media. They'll gravely shake their heads and tell us about the need for shared pain but they'll actually be getting a tax break using the Simpson approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. +1 --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. I've thought that should happen for a long time,
but shit this makes me real fucking nervous. Mainly this part:

Doing so would offer not only an opportunity to begin confronting the growth in the national debt but also a way to address warnings by American business that corporate tax rates and the costs of complying with the tax code are cutting into their global competitiveness.

Why do I think we might be fucked?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Translation: corporations want to pay less so where are we going to get money? hmmm.

I'd also say let them move: they'd be hard pressed to find lower taxes for corporations than the US. Maybe Moldovia. A great place to move your business, I hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. +1000%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proletariatprincess Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:57 PM
Original message
1000+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
53. It did
Ronald Reagan was President and the middle class got screwed. I recall it very, very distinctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. If President Obama intends to fix the tax system, then why screw it up with the current tax plan.
I don't support what the President is doing now. I will be a hard sell on anything he attempts in the future. I don't trust the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheEuclideanOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yes, very puzzling
Some politicians at least have the sense to recognize when they have screwed up and the sense to start running in the other direction or at least change the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
64. Heard a similar question to Obama on NPR. How the current deal is going to give
the Republican's much more ammunition to say "We don't have the tax revenue to support any social programs, sorry".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Howz about *just* closing those LOOPHOLES you said you'd close, Mr. President?
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 09:44 PM by FormerDittoHead
Just do ONE THING - don't wrap it up in some damn 10,000 page "bill" - just do ONE THING...

http://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/2010/10/16/weekly-address-gop-rewarding-corporations-create-jobs-overseas

The President lays out his agenda to foster investment here at home. He vows to close the tax loopholes for sending jobs and profits overseas the Congressional Republicans have tried to protect.

I suppose a "vow" is NOT a "promise"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
78. +10 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. "he objective is to rid the code of its complex buildup of deductions, credits and exemptions"
The objective is to rid the code of its complex buildup of deductions, credits and exemptions, thereby broadening the base of taxes collected and allowing for lower rates — much like a bipartisan majority on Mr. Obama’s fiscal commission recommended last week in its final blueprint for reducing the debt through 2020.

Obama is going to try to fuck us yet again. He's laying the groundwork to abolish deductions used primarily by the working-class, lower taxes on the rich and corporations and dismantle social security and other social programs. That's the essence of his catfood commission's "plan."

Obama has to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yes... "broadening the base of taxes collected.." Scary words indeed!
..and then lower the rates...

In other words, the rich will pay lower taxes. Surprise!

>Obama is going to try to fuck us yet again.

Here's my problem - BIG problem. It seems to me he already knows what the fuck he wants to do, what "can" be done with the Republicans, etc etc. He just has to "sell" it to us by promising us something we like (the rich will pay more) but then he'll have to "compromise" it away, to get to the point where he started - JUST LIKE THE PUBLIC OPTION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. That makes assumptions I no longer make
The way Obama and his minions like Biden are trying to force this latest giveaway to the rich (his "compromise") down the throats of members of HIS OWN PARTY tells me where he stands. He's doing nothing to force anything down the throats of republicans. In fact, the "compromise" contains even more of the GOP wish list than they were asking for in the first place (de-funding social security, embracing the concept of dynasties with the estate tax rollback, etc.)

No, I'm afraid this tells us where Obama truly stands philosophically. He's one of them. He's not one of us.

Obama has to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cdcfbw1 Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. That makes assumptions...
IMPEACH OBAMA!!
IMPEACH OBAMA!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #32
65. So that Biden, who "negotiated" the recent tax cut compromise with McConnell, would be Pres?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
35. Sounds exactly like something a Repuke would say
whoa. I want my time & money from 2008 back. I can use it to get the fuck out of this hell hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. lower rates and raise revenues
That sounds like one of those BS conservative sales pitches, like the supplyside rhetoric "lowering taxes increases revenues".

What a load of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm starting....
....to cringe whenever he wants to do something....please Mr. Prez, maybe less is more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. this is an interesting statement:
"though the study of the corporate tax system is farther along, officials said."

Why do I find this unsurprising?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
20. this is where we get our mortgage deduction removed surgically
in order to lower taxes on billionaires even more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Yup!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. They might be trying to get it all in .... before the revolution???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. Just this morning, the White House white board guy
bragged about how Obama was going to continue the tax credits for parents whose children were in college and low-income people, etc. That's in a video.

And now this. Why not just let the tax cuts for the rich expire and pay off the deficit that way and then bring in tax relief for the middle income and poor?

I do not trust Obama to do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
29. With a Republican House?
The time to try that was your first two years in office.

No, sorry, but any political capital you once had is long gone, chief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
30. This is NOT good news for the lower/middle classes. He's shown he really is a Repuke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
33. Here comes a flat tax, value added tax or will it be called a national sales tax? Whatever its
called it will not be working class friendly, I guarantee it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
34. Ah, yes. Lower rates & raise revenues. Just like Reagan did
And there are some really, really stupid people who still believe that's possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrTriumph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
36. Children should not play with matches.
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #36
50. LOL - I thought you said machetes! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
38. We're about to get screwed, aren't we?
I'm thinking we can say bye bye to the home mortgage deduction and hello to a flat tax and/or VAT.

Hopetastic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
39. By Global competitiveness do they mean their off shore Companies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OlympicBrian Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. Yes and their record profits nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
40. If done properly, this could be good reform, especially for individuals.
In the past, I've done work for a lot of people who make over a million dollars a year. It's shocking how little in taxes they pay. Many don't pay any income taxes at all because they expense everything. And they get away with it. If you can afford smart accountants and tax lawyers, you can pay very little in taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
41. I get very nervous whenever this adminstration starts talking about "reform" or any kind
It seems to be their code for "let's screw the working and middle classes again".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevebreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
42. A future presidential conversation between GW and Barack
Barack; It reminds me of the time I knocked down progressive Sally....
GW; You didn't knock her down! I did!
Barack; So you did, so you did, but I was the one who started kicking her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
44. This reads like a republican idea.
Edited on Fri Dec-10-10 12:15 AM by county worker
Get rid of any tax breaks working people have. JUST LET THE DAMNED TAX CUTS EXPIRE AND STFU Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
46. Hooboy, get the KY Jelly!
'cause we gonna' get FUCKED in the ass again!!!

"to address warnings by American business that corporate tax rates and the costs of complying with the tax code are cutting into their global competitiveness."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
47. In the interests of
bipartisanship, he will probably put Gingrich in charge. Then we can use the Gingrich approach "to address warnings by American business that corporate tax rates and the costs of complying with the tax code are cutting into their global competitiveness." You know - let the rich decide how much they feel like paying. Problem solved.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
48. I read they are considering dropping the home deduction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastLiberal in PalmSprings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
49. It should read, "GOP Weighing Broad Overhaul for Income Tax"
"President Obama Indicates Willingness to Compromise to Ensure Bi-partisanship"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
51. I like simplify
the tax code has gotten fairly unwieldy. It should be simple. I made this much. I pay these progressive percentages. Done.

But everyone loves their own pet deduction. Charity givers, church supporters, homeowners, parents, prius buyers, hummer buyers. etc.

Lets separate these things. No more tax deductions. If we are going to give people money to encourage certain activities, lets just give them that money, separate from taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
52. Mr. President, you really want to try to run that through a repug congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #52
55. The Republicans will write the new tax laws for him!
Watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #55
57. Yeah, that's what scares me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
56. Obama is doing such a good job batting cleanup for the Bush Agenda.
Amazing.

Is he an alien space lizard, a la "V"?

Or is he just another Neville Chaimberlain?

It doesn't really matter why, only what is.

So, whatever his actual inner thoughts and motivations, which we cannot know, Obama is the de facto and most excellent cleanup hitter for the Bush Agenda.

Conflating Soc. Sec. with the General Fund will purposefully set a precedent and finally break down any illusion that SocSec money belongs to anyone other than our American Nobility. If anyone is still dumb enough to believe the last shreds of bullshit window-dressing still hanging like crepe over the corpse of the Old American Republic.

Which of course there are. Hundreds of millions of them.

It's a joke, a very bad (or very good, depending on how one looks at it) joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creative Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
58. Can we say "Fair Tax?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
59. Didn't Regan say/do the same?
Don't remember the year. But I know I have heard the same rhetoric before. Tax simplification that more than doubled the pages in the tax code with loopholes for special interests IIRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #59
69. 1986! With the exact same "sales pitch" - "lower the rates, and
close the loopholes"!

It worked out VERY WELL for the very well off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
60. Translation:
Eliminate home mortgage deduction. Watch and see if most of this "reform" doesn't fall on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
61. Gee Obama..
... if you current legislative "accomplishments" are any guide, I'd prefer you just leave it alone. It sucks, but I have no doubt whatsoever that you could make it even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
66. Oooh, no, Mr. Bill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eringer Donating Member (338 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
68. Yeah, Right. Was this your idea or Biden's?
Per the NY Times article, "Mr. Obama signaled his inclination in off-the-cuff remarks on Wednesday as he was defending the tax cuts deal negotiated with Congressional Republicans this week. “We’ve got to have tax reform,” he said."
WHAT KIND OF CRAP TALK IS THAT?
What is wrong with the progressive tax system we have in place? The only thing wrong that I can tell (from a GOPea POV) is that it taxes the rich (in dollars not percent of income) more than the poor. Hey Prez, how about a flat tax? Yeah, that would be just great, even very great. Everyone can pay their fair share if we had a flat tax. Too bad I am not on the higher end of the tax brackets right now. I would be salivating at this point. As I am not, Obama needs to come home to his party or spend that rest of his tenure playing golf with Rush in Hawaii. The Democratic Party can run a nice presidential primary around him.

O'Malley 2012

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonnieS Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
70. sounds like he
is trying to implement everything by himself that was turned down from the Catfood Commission--like the attack on Social Security contained in the tax cut agreement and now this. Possibly the estate tax tho I am not sure that was in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #70
72. Exactly. He will push everything that came out of that Catfood Commission
as his own brand new shiny idea, thinking that the moderate voters are just going to go into an apeshit frenzy of support, and he'll get re-elected in a landslide!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
71. I wouldn't be shocked if he ran Neil Boortz's "Fair Tax" horseshit
up the flagpole to see how many would salute that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
73. The tax code needs to be overhauled , but not by the Republicans
and their confederates. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
75. "Lower rates and increase revenues"
Hoo boy. The idiots fell for it when Reagan did it. Will it work again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
76. I Know Folks Are Going To Be Cynical, But This Should Be A Priority
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
77. Goodbye mortgage interest and health insurance premium deductions! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidthegnome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
79. With all due respect
(which is none - for it must be earned) Mr. President, go do the anatomically impossible with yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
80. Uff da - I'm growing frightened of his 'reforms'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC