Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Obama signs $858 billion measure that extends tax cuts for two years, unemployment benefit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:28 PM
Original message
President Obama signs $858 billion measure that extends tax cuts for two years, unemployment benefit
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 04:29 PM by sabra
Source: CNN

Breaking News > President Obama signs $858 billion measure that extends tax cuts for two years, unemployment benefits for 13 months.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/



more:

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/12/17/tax.deal/index.html?hpt=T1&iref=BN1

Washington (CNN) -- President Barack Obama on Friday signed an $858 billion tax bill into law, saying "this is progress and that's what they (the American people) sent us here to achieve."

"We are here with good news for the American people this holiday season," he said. "By a wide margin, both houses of Congress passed a package of tax relief that will protect the middle class, that will grow our economy and will create jobs for the American people."

Obama was flanked on stage by Democrats and Republicans -- including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who was instrumental in getting the bipartisan legislation passed. Incoming House Speaker John Boehner, however, did not attend the bill signing.

The House of Representatives gave final approval late Thursday night to the deal, negotiated by the White House and top Senate Republicans. The final vote of 277-148 had almost equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans in support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. My mom says she'll never vote for him again.
Die hard Democrat. Left as they come. She calls him spaghetti because he's skinny and spineless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haikugal Donating Member (476 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We can kiss our ass goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think that many people who say that now, and I understand why they are so frustrated,
will end up voting for Obama anyway in 2012. They will not vote for the Republican candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Or just not vote for either presidential candidate at all.
That's what I think will happen. And if Obama decides not to run, the DLC will supply us another clone that is lop-sided to the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frisbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. And assuming Obama does run and win...
just how far right will he go when he knows he won't have to worry about reelection. Without fear of losing a second term, he may (I suspect will) veer even farther to the right. He will become a repuke in all but name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sirthomas66 Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. That is exactly what will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
sirthomas66 Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. I think you are wrong. I know you are wrong in my neighborhood
who will have Fire Obama on every house but two by next week. Our monthly meeting will be next week. Usually about a third attend. This time I expect all to attend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Ticonderoga Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
31. Which republican candidate would you be
referring to, Obama, or the other guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Ruperto31 Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
67. Oh, I dunno. I might vote for Mittens. I don't see much difference.
Except that it's cool to have a black guy in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. There won't be any "cooling off" time. He has the GOP as his Big Excuse now
for passing every shred of far Right pro-corporate legislation on his agenda. You think we're pissed now? It's going to get even uglier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. My dad says the same thing, and he was once one of Obama's most rabid supporters
gave the maximum contribution to his campaign (on a retiree's budget) and was defending everything Obama did until recently. Now he keeps saying sadly "we've been had." Neither of us will ever vote for him again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WizardLeft62 Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Harry Reid is another double-talker & liar
You also count Harry Reid being "spaghetti because he's skinny and spineless," just like his pal Barack Obama.

The Congressional Democrats show just how corporate-controlled they are as well and don't care about the people they are supposed to "represent."

It's own the big money interests which now matter in this neo-fedual America these days.

"Bipartisanship" my ass....Obama uses this as cover to implement the policies of his pals at Goldman Sachs. Obama is completely wrong that "all economists think this is good."

There is no "Middle Class" and as more and more jobs leave this country, the Middle Class will be more and more hollowed out.

Obama speaks with a forked tongue too. Obama is so transparent and his explanations are so weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ticonderoga Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. Your Mom certainly speaks for me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruperto31 Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #30
69. I rember the Dem primary, where I actually called up friends...
and urged them to show up for the local "caucus." The community center was jammed with people, all voting for Obama. The polling officials ran out of ballots, and ended up using scraps of paper. Everyone was so excited.

After the election I was talking with an old hippie in line at WalMart, who said, "Meet the new boss--same as the old boss." (You know, that old line from The Who.) And I thought: cynical bastard.

But he was right. We got fooled again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yesssssss!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. notice how much the dem logo
looks like a corporate trade mark........

appropriate I guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. I think it looks like a bullseye
Who had that bright idea, anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
57. You mean this logo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruperto31 Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
70. Like this?
<img src="">
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. The bill that DECREASES support for Soc. Sec. fund????
Hope anyone who is happy about this does not have family members who depend on Soc. Sec.now or soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. Well, obviously lamp_shade is thrilled, so she/he must have a fat trust fund
the rest of us are totally fucked. I have several family members who depend on SS to get by. I can't afford to support all of us if they no longer have it. No do mention the dollar devaluation and inflation this will bring us, and, of course, more unemployment as city and State workers get laid off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. "We are here with good news for the American people this holiday season,"
How the hell can he stand there and say that with a straight face?

unfucking believable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. +1000% --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. He doesn't think that anyone with less than tens of millions of dollars in the bank
is an American, that's how. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nice going, Republicans, for ignoring the evidence from CBO and the harm of this to SS
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 04:43 PM by alp227
Sheesh. CBO: "Tax cuts won't really help the economy." Republicans: "Yawwwnnn...no new taxes...oh wait, what's that? DEFICIT? Cut spending!"

I wish that the political system could've been more simple and allowed the Democrats to have their way, but thanks to the frickin' filibuster rule (historically used to block civil rights even) the choice was everyone or no one gets tax cuts starting next year.

Clinton survived by working with Republicans. George H.W. Bush (aka Mr. "Read my lips: no new taxes") on the other hand, when he compromised with Democrats in Congress to raise taxes, got booted after one term. The younger Bush was re-elected (yeah i get it about the Ohio flap) after 2 tax cuts in his first term.

Oh, this cartoon...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. And Obama was an innocent bystander? Obama made the deal -- !!
Cut out Congress completely -- what's new?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. The tax cuts and the Trojan horse to dismantle Social Security carry his signature
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. We are so fucked.
Better change the letters on that toon in your sig line from "MLK" to "GOP".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WizardLeft62 Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. Big Deal
I was physically ill during the Bush reign of terror.

I am again physically ill in the reign of Obama.

I am outraged, disgusted and a subject of Democratic Party double-cross and collusion with the savage and barbaric Republican Party.

Welcome to the New Dark Ages here in the United States.

Obama and the Democratic Party have become the Weimer Democrats and the great appeasers.

I cannot stand to see any of these politicians and this includes those in the Democratic Party talking on television. And you can throw every last Democrat into the Atlantic Ocean because that's what they just did to all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. +1nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenzoDia Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
29. Isn't the SS payroll tax break just for one year?
How is this dismantling Social Security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Haven't you heard
We'll never get back the 2% withheld from our paychecks. Then the companies that match it won't pay the 2% either which means Social Security is going to start having deficits in 20 years instead of 30. And Congress will never do anything like raise the ceiling from $109,000 to $250,000 because only corporate teat suckers rule Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court. Which means we're all doomed to live like people in the Grapes Of Wrath. So make sure you know how to farm, because in 10 years nobody will have jobs, money, or support.

:tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenzoDia Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. If I'm not mistaken, the payroll tax break is for the employee only. Employer rates remain unchanged
Plus Social Security's Trust Fund will be payed back from General Revenues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. You're not mistaken
See the little tin foil hats at the bottom of my post? Unfortunately, a lot of DUers think what I posted, and they just counter facts with, "You're just an appeaser" rhetoric. I don't even bother trying to reason with them anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenzoDia Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. Oh my lol. You got me pretty good.
Heh, I should pay a little more attention before getting defensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. When DID your boat land?
Was it yesterday? This morning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenzoDia Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. General Revenues will be used to replenish the Social Security's Trust Fund.
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 07:04 PM by BenzoDia
http://www.npr.org/2010/12/10/131969824/some-worry-payroll-tax-cut-threatens-social-security


Under the one-year deal hatched by Obama and Republican lawmakers, Social Security's long-term financial problems would not worsen. That's because the retirement program's trust fund would be reimbursed for its lost tax receipts.


http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/12/07/fact-sheet-framework-agreement-middle-class-tax-cuts-and-unemployment-in


The tax cut legislation would provide for a transfer of General Revenues to the Social Security Trust Fund, ensuring no negative impact on Social Security solvency.


edit:
Added article quotes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. There goes social security. Precedent will drain it dry. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruperto31 Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #41
73. In other words, they will print up some money to pay Social Security.
How long do they think they can continue this? The Fed just recently ordered another $800 billion added to the money supply--none of it backed up in taxes.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=97443894

At the end of this road is hyperinflation.

The traditional solution for hyperinflation is fascism.

Starvation and fascism. Not a pretty picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #29
60. A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
Edited on Sat Dec-18-10 03:17 AM by No Elephants
If OASDI is really in trouble, as they keep telling us, why give even one day's payroll tax "break?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
35. Mission Accomplished!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidthegnome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
37. At this point
I consider him a traitor, if not in the classic sense, then at the least a traitor to those of us who worked to get him elected - to those of us who believed in him.

I will not stand idly by. Maybe there's not much I can do, but what little I can do, I will. If he thinks we "sanctimonious purists" will allow this to go unanswered, he is mistaken. Perhaps I'll work on putting together a community protest, but I will not let this slide. I will answer his betrayal with true progressive action, somehow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
39. The rich get two years and the poor get 13 months.
'Pay attention children, that sound was your future being sold down the river'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
40. what a hero
for the rich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
42. And with this ends all hope for America.
fuck you very much, Obama and all the corporate-whore Dems that helped this pass.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Oh, and the $7.4 billion for the 9/11 First Responders bill must have cost offsets but this doesn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
45. In the end, what finally blew me away about this was the speed
Two weeks ago, this bill was just a wet dream in the pants of the Rethuglican Senators and the President's inner circle who capitulated, er, negotiated on it. Not a single Democratic House member knew squat about it, as far as we know.

Why didn't the President get our agenda passed so quickly and so completely???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
46. And the combination to the Social Security safe, too? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
49. I can't say anything that won't get me banned...
...so I must take Thumper's advice and say nothing at all.

-Sandy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Well we know what all those deleted messages are saying
and it not what the mods like around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Correct...where are the DU'ers who do "Silent Moment" in "Memorium" when someone passes on.
Best to remain "mum." I actually wasn't going to reply to this..but, I'm just drowning my sorrows in watching the "post mortum" of the passage.

I would love to see a "Silent Thread" in protest. But, that would be much too "In Your Face" for these times here on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
52. Obama is the Santa Claus of the rich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackspade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
53. I'm so disgusted I can't hardly respond.
Obama's tenure as a Democrat is over. He is officially a Republican to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silenttigersong Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
54. ????????
Is there any DUer that knows of a list of the 6600 family's that benefit from this tax?I know the Waltons, Hiltons are ,but am dumbfounded to the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skoalyman Donating Member (751 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
55. this is progress and that's what they (the lobbyist ) sent us here to achieve
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny Harpo Donating Member (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
56. This bill was a double-edged sword...............
damned if he did...damned if he didnt.

It was lose-lose from the start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #56
59. What about the unemployed?
No, it wasn't a perfect bill, but what is? Politics is the art of the possible, & anyone who thought we'd get everything we wanted was fooling themselves.

I wasn't happy about tax cuts for the uber-wealthy, but to me, Job One is making sure the jobless get their benefits extended. The quickest way to a double-dip recession is to cut off unemployment. As we all know, that money goes directly back into the economy; the jobless don't sit on their money, like banks or those who can afford to.
If there's no political will, or will on the part of the private sector to create jobs, unemployment MUST be extended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #59
62. Unemployment insurance would have been extended anyway.
We've had 4 or 5 extensions in which Republicans cooperated. They would never have denied another extension right before Christmas, citing tax cuts for those making over a million a year as their reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruperto31 Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #62
68. Unfortunately, this is unverifiable. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #56
61. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
58. I was undecided on its passage
I will await its results to see if it was a good idea or a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
63. Obama end ran Congress on a legislative matter.
So much for those who claim he defers to Congress because he he is observing his proper Constitutional role.

He got House Democrats to change their minds about this overnight. So much for those who claim a President and head of his Party's National Committee and its purse, has no power over Congress, including a Congress dominated by his own Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChumbawambaFan Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
64. Obama is an idiot that pissed away 8 years of hard earned public support for Dem policies...
After Bush we could do no wrong.
We could've elected a real leader...instead we pick Mr. Milktoast..Mr. Middle of the Road.
And he DID make great strides for about 4 months...then essentially disappeared as far as I could tell.

And what did we achieve with that hard earned Bush Legacy wind at our backs?
A Health Care Policy that doesn't lower costs and is being taken down by the courts anyway.
A few other things. All elevated beyond recognition if you listen to Obama's description of them.

8 YEARS of SUFFERING and we get squatted on yet again.
Sickening. I can't wait to vote Democrat again in 2012!
I love voting for the lesser of two evils! Yay!!
The poop from this anus is so much less disgusting than from the other one!

I wish we had someone willing to really fight for the poor of this country.
But, as long as the campaign process is the way it is (and it seems to be getting worse)
...I guess I shouldn't expect much.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
65. Extending and Owning the Bush Tax Cuts: the chump change I voted for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
66. We should try and impeach.
Obama does not represent us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
71. Wow, thanks Obama!
I really appreciate this. It's going to be a little harder to get around with your dick up my ass, but I'm sure that I'll be able to find a homeless encampment by the time you and your pals cut Social Security to the bone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
72. Let's borrow $858 billion from China and Saudi Arabia
Pay 3.3% interest on it, add the whole thing to the federal debt and give millionaires low tax rates.

A brilliant economic policy.

At what point in time do the hedge funds start buying default swaps on US bonds?
We'll never know because that's all done in secret.
Until one day....surprise!

The end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC