Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dodging Repatriation Tax Lets U.S. Companies Bring Home Cash

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 09:15 AM
Original message
Dodging Repatriation Tax Lets U.S. Companies Bring Home Cash
Source: Bloomberg

At the White House on Dec. 15, business executives asked President Obama for a tax holiday that would help them tap more than $1 trillion of offshore earnings, much of it sitting in island tax havens.

The money -- including hundreds of billions in profits that U.S. companies attribute to overseas subsidiaries to avoid taxes -- is supposed to be taxed at up to 35 percent when it’s brought home, or “repatriated.” Executives including John T. Chambers of Cisco Systems Inc. say a tax break would return a flood of cash and boost the economy.

What nobody’s saying publicly is that U.S. multinationals are already finding legal ways to avoid that tax. Over the years, they’ve brought cash home, tax-free, employing strategies with nicknames worthy of 1970s conspiracy thrillers -- including “the Killer B” and “the Deadly D.”

Merck & Co Inc., the second-largest drugmaker in the U.S., last year brought more than $9 billion from abroad without paying any U.S. tax to help finance its acquisition of Schering- Plough Corp., securities filings show. Merck is also appealing a federal judge’s 2009 finding that Schering-Plough owed taxes on $690 million it had earlier brought home from overseas tax-free.



Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-29/dodging-repatriation-tax-lets-u-s-companies-bring-home-cash.html




The rich want other tax cut already!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. The admin should DENY, and ask the island nations to remove the tax haven mark or face
sanctions. Heavy sanctions.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Just pull a Reagan and invade them. Annex and grant statehood
to the P.O. boxes . . . just the boxes, leave the rest of the country as-is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. The first and only war I'll endorse! Bwahaha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. goddamn them.
pay your taxes traitors!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Now it's wait and see
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsLeopard Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. Wait for it
There will be a Friday afternoon news dump soon that gives them exactly what they asked for. Given the history, I assume when they asked Obama to let them bring obsecene profits into the country at no tax, the reply was, "Say no more! Done!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. "the uncompetitive U.S. tax structure"
Such a move “is a short-term fix to a long-term problem, which is the uncompetitive U.S. tax structure,” said Cisco spokeswoman Jennifer Greeson Dunn. The San Jose, California- based company reported $31.6 billion of undistributed foreign earnings, on which it had paid no U.S. taxes, as of July 31.

President Obama, who campaigned in part against companies’ use of offshore havens to avoid U.S. taxes, asked Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner to follow up on the issue with business leaders, according to a White House official who asked not to be identified because the discussions were private.

The argument that a new tax break for offshore earnings would generate a domestic stimulus “holds no water at all,” said Joel B. Slemrod, an economics professor at the University of Michigan’s school of business and former senior tax economist for President Reagan’s Council of Economic Advisers. U.S. companies are already sitting on a record pile of cash -- $1.9 trillion in liquid assets, according to Federal Reserve data.


I guess it will be viewed as imperative that we have to have the lowest tax rates (for corporations and the rich) in the world, lest we become "uncompetitive." And now that Obama has been revealed as another acolyte for the "trickle down" Reagan nonsense, we'll see more of this outrageous behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Here's your fucking problem right there:
Cisco spokeswoman Jennifer Greeson Dunn. The San Jose, California- based company reported $31.6 billion of undistributed foreign earnings, on which it had paid no U.S. taxes, as of July 31.


31.6b in undistributed foreign earnings. That means offshore proftis. It needs to be taxed on all foreign investment to ensure that the corporation fatcats pay their fucking share.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heywood J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. If they're laundering money to avoid taxes...
Merck & Co Inc., the second-largest drugmaker in the U.S., last year brought more than $9 billion from abroad without paying any U.S. tax to help finance its acquisition of Schering- Plough Corp., securities filings show

Then void about $9 billion of their patents as punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. 200% tax
make them pay 18 billion. They can afford it:


Cisco spokeswoman Jennifer Greeson Dunn. The San Jose, California- based company reported $31.6 billion of undistributed foreign earnings, on which it had paid no U.S. taxes, as of July 31.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. Ill-gotten gain off shore money laundering operations....
that these coproration run....tax holiday my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. Every cent of the repatriated money will go out as dividends @ 15% tax rate.
Boost the economy? Who's economy?






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikekohr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. UPS, A Corporate Sponsor Of “The Contract On America,” Has An Overseas Shell Corporation
based in Bermuda, named Overseas Partners Limited (OPL). The sole purpose of this shell corporation is avoidance of United States income taxes. The IRS won the largest back taxes judgment in history against them in the late 1990’s. The Bush administration dropped the case during the appeals process.

The overwhelming percentage of profits that are funneled to this tax avoidance shelter are revenues generated within the borders of the United States, on tax payer funded infrastructure, roads, airports, etc. UPS like hundreds or thousands of US corporation engaged in such shenanigans are Tax Traitors, pure and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. How about, slam shut the loop-holes
and throw the bastards in jail, or off with their heads?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. The guillotine is thirsty! Hurry up!
Oh, no, just get the money they stole back here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
13. Have I mentioned today how much I hate greedy corporate bastards
and wish they would all burst spontaneously into flames?

Consider I did even if I didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I can't say that too much myself. Thanks for reminding me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
14. Thanks again Obama ...thanks for caring about the rest of us.
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DallasNE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. But Bush Already Gave Them A Tax Holiday
It is their own fault if they didn't bring home the money then, when it was completely legal. And how much of a boost to the economy did it give back then? What a bunch of cry babies and such liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
20. Whoever asked that should have been grabbed by the collar and booted out to awaiting press

SHAME THE MOTHERF*CKERS at the very least dammit - it costs nothing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. at which point does this become extortion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grins Donating Member (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
23. Sure! Here's the deal...
Every $25 you spend IN THE UNITED STATES on NEW HIRING, and construction, you get to bring $1 home, tax-free.

You first. Oh, and bite me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC