Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Man strips at Va. airport checkpoint in protest

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 07:21 AM
Original message
Man strips at Va. airport checkpoint in protest
Source: Associated Press

The Associated Press
Friday, December 31, 2010; 7:13 AM

RICHMOND, Va. -- Police say a man stripped to his underwear at a Virginia airport checkpoint in a protest against security procedures.

Airport police said the man took off his shirt and pants at Richmond International Airport on Thursday. He had scrawled across his chest a reference to the Constitution's 4th Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure.

Police identified the man as 21-year-old Aaron B. Tobey of Charlottesville, Va. He told police he was a student at the University of Cincinnati.

Tobey was interviewed by airport police and federal authorities, issued a citation for disorderly conduct and released. He is scheduled for arraignment on Jan. 10.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/31/AR2010123100617.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Can you see a line of people protesting like this?
Traveling has gotten very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. I'm surprised more people haven't done similar
FB friend didn't wear underwear. Thought she was an exhibitionist. Now I'm thinking she made a statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
91. O, I'm sure of it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. It is going to take a mass stripping to get any real action
Until the people demand a change, our rights will continue to erode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
59. Even if they do, it'll make the news like the massive antiwar protests did. Zip. Nada. Nothing.
Like it never happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. Unfortunately most people are sheep, and some are convinced
groping and nude-o-scans are necessary for our "safety." A relative's comment when discussing this Christmas Eve: "I'm glad they do it. If it keeps me from getting blown up, it's worth it."

As long as people are willing to subject themselves to it, it will continue. Will only stop when enough people stop all discretionary flying, and the airlines start to feel the pain in the bottom line. Once the airlines start putting pressure on the government to back off, it will be scaled back. Not before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fatbuckel Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. Do ya think that stripping down to your guchies in an airport might give TSA probable cause?
Idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. TSA is not a law enforcement agency. They can't arrest anybody. They
are only empowered to harass, intimidate, and deny people their constitutional right to privacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fatbuckel Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Yea....thats their purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #31
79. Pretty much, that is their purpose. Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #30
111. Then how is it that if you refuse both scanning and pat down, you can be detained and fined $10,000?
Do they detain you and call the cops?

Bottom line is, it's a clear and gross violation of the Fourth Amendment.

And i.m.h.o., if 10% of air travellers did something like this, it would bring the searches to a screeching halt. Because it would bring the whole security theater to a screeching halt.

If ten percent just demanded pat downs, I don't think TSA has the manpower to handle it.

I actually think this is an area where civil disobedience might work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #111
117. Dupe
Edited on Sat Jan-01-11 06:45 AM by LibDemAlways
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #111
118. Yes, if they want to take action against you,
Edited on Sat Jan-01-11 06:44 AM by LibDemAlways
they have to summon the cops. I think people have a lot of potential power here if they choose to exercise it. The threat of mass opt outs at Thansgiving had the TSA turning off the nude-o-scopes and foregoing the "enhanced" pat downs to keep things running smoothly. If opting out became the norm, they couldn't handle the crowds waiting to be patted down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #118
120. +1!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #27
73. Actually quite the reverse is true. The people who have been protesting, such as
The "bikini" woman in the wheelchair, reveal for everyone to see, how little "there" there is in TSA. If TSA was really about figuring out who is a terrorist and who isn't, don't you think by now, some weeks after her initial protest, they would know she is not affiliated with Al Queada? They certainly have had time to collect the data on her.

These exploits of our braver and more knowledgeable fellow citizens shed light on what a farce TSA is.

Any terrorist cell wanting to bring harm to the USA could quite easily cement some thermite into the lining of their hard luggage, put a battery activiated toy into the same suitcase, let that bundle go into the "check in luggage" cargo area of the plane, and bring along a "cell phone" that can detonate the luggage once the airplane is in flight.

As someone who has carried a device that looks for all intents and purposes like a handheld detonator, let me tell you that the TSA folks don't even notice said device.

This TSA activity is all about getting us to conform to the madness, so that when the dollar goes into free fall and the stores have no more food, they can come and take those they consider to be problematic away.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley Donating Member (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #73
97. careful what you say
... or someone may come knocking on your door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #97
100. Well, if you don't
Edited on Fri Dec-31-10 07:18 PM by truedelphi
Tell them about me, I won't tell them about you!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #27
122. havent heard "guchies" in a long long time.... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
23. It's like the Alice's Restaurant Massacre!
Edited on Fri Dec-31-10 10:17 AM by rfranklin
Except butt naked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. oh, wouldn't it be great if people sang that while stripping?
how hilarious would that be? make sure you have a friend with a good phone along so it can be the next viral youtube hit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #35
61. + a gazillion! lol! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #35
68. That would be a great flash mob
:rofl:

A tad long to do the whole massacree.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #68
78. yes it would
just the chorus would be enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #68
84. Only in America
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #84
98. I wonder if it would be enough for people to just start singing the refrain
In 3 part harmony of course.



And feeling.



We're just waiting for it to come around again here...

:rofl:

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #68
99. It would also give the term "flash mob" a whole NEW meaning.
Edited on Fri Dec-31-10 06:53 PM by Ken Burch
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
33. A line of mooners, perchance?
After all, it's freedom of expression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
55. It would be wonderful!
...if there were hundreds, on a daily basis doing this.

What the hell is the "gestapo/TSA" going to do? Arrest and ticket
thousands and thousands?

I'm a Dem and a Progressive but this TSA garbage is out of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
112. They've done it already in Europe -
saw a video of a bunch of people stripped to undies and bikinis going through a checkpoint.

They're way ahead of us when it comes to protesting bullshit like this.
Remember the mass moonings of the Chimperor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wonderful!
Good for him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. ...
:cry: i am never in the right place at the right time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scottybeamer70 Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
28. Laughing......
at comment by xchrom...............:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattSh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Freaking WP and AP.
Not a mention of anyone's reaction. Presumably only Aaron, some TSA handlers and the police were there.

Oh yeah, I forgot. It might just encourage other people to do the same thing if an article mentions people cheered, or jeered, or shuffled around like sheep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. Supposedly, RW wants airport security privatized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
34. I guess it already is in the red states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, he's the one charged with disorderly conduct...
unfuckingbelieveable. I really don't ever want to fly to the US ever again. Hell, in a few years everyone will be subjected to a strip search when flying. It wasn't so long ago that you'd think an airport employee touching your genitals would have been something they would get in trouble for... now it's us who get in trouble for not letting people grope us. This shit is completely crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. I used to do that.
Edited on Fri Dec-31-10 09:05 AM by sofa king
For a lot of the '90s and early '00s, I traveled frequently and had long hair, which meant I got randomly selected for special attention every single flight I took (and any checked-in luggage was also "lost" perhaps over half the time, just like Mo Atta's was on 9/11).

It got to the point where, in Providence, they would shoo the scary looking people into a plexiglass fish tank in the middle of a boring maze-line one at a time, so that literally hundreds of people were watching the pre-perps like me. Then an employee would yell at the subject to undo his belt, unzip his pants, lower his pants like he's a goddamned underage Jordache model, and spin around.

So I started dropping my pants before they could tell me not to. The first time, it threw them off so bad they actually took me out of the line and escorted me straight to my plane (I'd dropped trow that time because I was late and getting pissed off). A few weeks later, I did it again and it ended the procedure instantly and got me back into the regular line, and for most of that year it was good for some sort of conciliatory treatment like a quick wand-and-go.

Then they moved on to some other BS procedure, but by then I'd cut my hair and thus I'd ceased to be a terrorist threat.

Edit: It occurs to me that I flew often enough that some of you might have actually seen me do this. A cookie for the fellow flyer who remembers my underwear and can describe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evasporque Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Satin string bikini?...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Thankfully, no.
That would have been considered a terrorist attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
56. White boxers with red valentine hearts? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
41. "I'd cut my hair and thus I'd ceased to be a terrorist threat"...
a good shave can do that for you, too :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #41
107. That's what she said
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #107
109. Seriously...
I have not had a professional shave in the 18 years I have lived in Texas. I finally found someone who does a straight razor shave- hot towel, warm lather, facial massage, the whole nine yards. I don't care how grumpy you are, after a professional barber shave the world looks 1000 times better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
124. these?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. I salute the protester, and curse the reporter who did not solicit any cell phone pictures
from the onlookers. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fatbuckel Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
29. Maybe nobody cared. Or can`t that possibly be a likely scenario?
Maybe,just maybe some people go to airports to travel somewhere. Maybe MOST people did`nt get "groped". Waa.Waa. Boo hoo. Don`t fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrick t. cakes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. look, the sheeple fight back.
your the problem. go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #37
48. your the problem. go away.
Your "what" is the problem?

Your statement would have more umph if you used the correct words.



Prudes shouldn't fly.

Stripping naked to protest having to "strip naked" seems lame to me.

No one is requiring anyone to fly. There are other transportation methods. Flying sux these day even without the security kabuki!

Of course if all this groping and x-raying actually made flying safer, it wold be different. But most of it is for "show" to make people feel safer.

And how much "right to privacy" does one have on PUBLIC transportation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #48
69. "No one is requiring anyone to fly."
this statement while true on the face of it is so infuriating and unfair. my choices are don't fly and never see my son and grandchildren, don't fly and lose my job, or fly and sacrifice my constitutional rights of privacy in order to see my loved ones.

free choice. all mine. right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fatbuckel Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #69
113. Wow...slow down there, drama queen. All I said was maybe noone cared about Mr.Stripdown,
I could care less why you fly or don't fly and how your constitutional rights are getting stomped. I fly a bazillion times a year for my job(FOH Engineer) and I carry on a laptop and various electronic kajinkeses and have NEVER been searched because I prepare ahead of time and follow the rules. I even have long hair and mostly wear Ramones T-shirts while I'm boarding. I fly out of airports all over the world and the North American airports are the most laid back I've encountered. Ever fly out of Israel? Machine guns,buddy. Go ahead, strip down to your gutchies there and see how that goes. You know, some people feel the need to argue against the current policy, no matter what it is. If tommorrow the policy was take anything on the plane you want, then the TSA are bastards for not checking people for shit. But I don't want some nutbag with explosives on a plane with ME for ten hours just because some douch thinks that by getting felt up at a checkpoint equates to the end of the known free world and all things democratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #113
119. drama queen?
you can make your point without insulting me. and i hear your point.

"equates to the end of the known free world and all things democratic."

i never said any such thing. but it is another chink in the armor. personal privacy is becoming a thing of the past and that is not consistent with liberty or with our rights as guaranteed by the constitution.

and no i've not been to israel and what does that have to do with the fact that my son and grandchildren and i live on opposite sides of north america?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #48
86. No one is requiring anyone to fly?
Hah? What if you have to fly for your job? Then in fact an employer is requiring an employee to fly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrick t. cakes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #48
114. Your defending unlawful search and seizure.
Your a sheep and your also the problem. America dissolves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. I agree 100% with your sentiments. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #29
90. And don't take the train or the Metro or the bus or shop
The TSA smurfs will be coming soon to a shopping mall near you.

Some people are obliged to fly for business or personal reasons or compassionate reasons. Don't be a jerk.

The TSA has been known to frisk soldiers in uniform. They also frisk pilots. Think about that particular aspect of the security theatre business. These reject burger pushers frisk the people who most easily could bring the plane down.

Try thinking things thru before your fingers run away and type dumb stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #90
104. "these reject burger pushers"
Edited on Fri Dec-31-10 08:16 PM by LibDemAlways
While I happen to agree with you that the TSA employees are the lowest of the low, those can be construed as fighting words here on DU. Got into it one day with a poster when I said something similar about TSA employees and was rudely reminded that these were human beings with families to feed...yada, yada......

That said, the ones I've encountered have mostly been morons not fit to cook fries at Mickey D's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 09:39 AM
Original message
This is happening under a Democratic Admin. WTF. Just wait til the repukes get control. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
36. Is there any real difference anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #36
81. Not much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #36
103. In a word........fuckno
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
88. It actually might get better because some of them seem to oppose
the TSA methods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #88
123. And if repubs were once again in charge of this crap, more progressives might grow a spine
and oppose it instead of cheering it on.

The ACLU and pro-civil-liberties Dems opposing this are only a small fraction of those who should be opposing this (and Surveillance Nation), IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeryLibGal Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
13. Good for him! The TSA should be cited with disorderly conduct.
They make people strip and it is okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
15. I bet he gets put on the sex offender registry.
This country is just that fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prodigals0n Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
16. A disorderly persons citation for what?
There is a guy in Times Square in New York City in his underwear every day. When did standing around in your underwear become disorderly? He should be given props for helping make the TSA's dirty work easier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
42. because they had to arrest him for *something*
& since he kept his undies on, they couldn't nail him for "indecent exposure."

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
70. I agree! He's just a very cooperative guy!
Oh, yeah, that stuff from the old antique thing called the Constitution written on his chest was the problem.

Like sunlight to vampires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wial Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #70
87. that's brilliant!
Is there a way to get a bumper sticker out of it?

4th amendment is to TSA
like sunlight is to vampires

something like that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
17. Civil Disobedience
"Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty. The obedient must be slaves."
Henry David Thoreau

"We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was legal and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was illegal."
Martin Luther King, Jr. in Letters from a Birmingham Jail


"If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable."
Louis D. Brandeis - US Supreme Court Justice (1916-1939)


"Disobedience, the rarest and most courageous of the virtues, is seldom distinguished from neglect, the laziest and commonest of the vices."
George Bernard Shaw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
74. "Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry."
Thomas Jefferson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
18. Boxers or briefs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
67. Depends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mosaic Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
19. Observations
The damn terrorists must be smiling. Americans gladly give up their freedom for a little security, pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
102. When do we get the security part?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
20. It's Coming...
and not too soon, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
21. Airport streaking
is next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
50. o yes they call him the streak....
fastest thing on two feet (great, that damn song is gonna be running through my head all day)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #50
116. Always making the news, wearing just his tennis shoes
Yes, you could call him unique!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #116
121. ...
watch out, our age is showing :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
24. GOOD! Keep up the good work
and I hope this is the start of something bigger...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harvey007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
25. A brave young man
I hope he gets a good lawyer.

Unfortunately, people who dare to question authority at the airport can be banned from flying and TSA can do this to anyone for any reason.

http://www.aclu.org/national-security/us-government-no-fly-list-unconstitutional-and-ineffective
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
26. Bravo Aaron!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
32. OK, this is funny
Generally I have to agree with the security procedures but still this is :rofl:

A good protest idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atypical Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
38. Ridiculous
I think it is ridiculous that this guy removes his clothing, thus making the searching just the way TSA wants it, and they hit him with a disorderly conduct charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. TSA wants to be the bully. It doesn't want its victims
Edited on Fri Dec-31-10 12:23 PM by LibDemAlways
engaging in any one-upsmanship that makes it look foolish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #39
51. yep, quite common trait...
in law enforcement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #38
76. Agreed.
Looks like TSA thinks that virtual strip search by an x-ray scanner is just fine, but an actual strip down is going to get someone arrested? What gives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
40. For all the TSA's yelling & screaming that molesting passengers was so necessary
I have to say that at neither airport I used this Christmas season were the molestations or porno scanners being utilized. In fact, in one of them, I forgot to take out my toothpaste & lotion, but I guess it was okay because they were in that plastic baggie that keeps them from exploding.

Just further proof that this is just all bull shit security theater.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #40
52. "that keeps them from exploding"..
thanks for the best chuckle I had all week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #40
63. "bull shit security theater"
That's exactly what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. Theater is a good description. Especially after seeing how lax security is downstairs for employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #40
95. I know the feeling. The County has installed
Edited on Fri Dec-31-10 06:32 PM by truedelphi
Metal Detectors in their lobby to the Main Court House, Building of Public Records.

I went in the building swinging a bottle of expensive orange-aid with protein powder. Immediately, I was ordered to shuck the bottle into the trash, to prove that I am a law abiding, God fearing, Authority conforming member of society.

Said to the security personnel, "I think I'll go do some errands instead." Basically cuz I did want to finish up my drink.

One half hour later, when I came back, sans bottle, both security personnel said, "Oh we are so glad you came back." They gave each other these significant looks - like now they didn't have to report to Homelands Shit-curity that someone of deviant mind and philosophy walks the streets of Lakeport Calif. in broad daylight, swinging bottle with orange colored contents.

But two months later, during a remodeling project involving the same lobby where the metal scanner was sitting, all of the public was told to enter via a side door. No security there for 48 hours! No one to tell anyone not to bring in dangerous, Al Queda-suspected liquids. Now all of a sudden, only thing that is important is remodeling and re-decorating!

Oh my. Could it be it is not about security and keeping us safer, after all?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #95
105. It has never been about safety. If that was the case they'd dismantle
TSA and invest in intelligent security. But that's apparently too hard. Easier (and bigger profits for the likes of Chertoff and other leeches) to convince the sheep that they need to be nude-o-scoped and/or felt-up in order to be "safe."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1American Donating Member (154 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
43. the stripper punk
15 seconds of infamous jollies...what a dork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #43
82. What a dork
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
44. You'd think they would be thanking him for making their job easier
Besides, it's not like stripped naked. Is there a law that says you can't be in your underwear in public?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mackerel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. There was a women who stripped down to her bikini
although I don't recall many protesting her. A lot of wolf whistles though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #45
77. I know of at least a couple women that stripped down to their
bikinis. They didn't get arrested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomhayes Donating Member (476 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
46. Real mature
I'm sure this isn't helping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. You're right...
he, and all americans should quietly submit and STFU about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomhayes Donating Member (476 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #54
60. Sure - those are the only two options
Again, real mature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #60
92. Perhaps you'd like to outline some other options?
I guess sitting in the front of the bus seemed real mature to you as well.

This guy is quite rightly protesting the tyranny that the TSA Smurfs represent.

Letters to Nappy and our congress critters certainly seem to have little effect. One receives boiler plate prose about an "abundance of caution" and "keeping Americans safe" and damn all else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
20score Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #46
85. I for one am very glad he did it. We need much more of this type of street protest. Mature pundits
speaking about this in a serious manner, coupled with concerned people discussing this in no-nonsense tones, will get nothing done.

So, kudos to him and anyone else who does this in the future.

And worse case, it won't hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
47. No pictures, no video, why bother
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertDiamond Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
53. Go Aaron Tobey! Does the term "civil disobedience" define this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
57. Real antiwar protesters suffered bigger rights violations than this TSA sideshow
I had to limit my protest else I could get fired, arrested or Rodney Kinged for expressing my protest in a legal fashion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
James48 Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
58. A Constitutional Scholar! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ctwayne Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
62. Remember that Day Well
There is a reason why I post with RFK's picture. I was a volunteer in his campaign. I believe his death fundamentally changed American history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
64. I always try to think of the way I could get my 15 minutes
Too bad I didn't think of this. It's in the realm of the possible for me. Though it might be horrifying for everyone in the airport at the time. :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. I salute you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
71. applause! Would love to have seen it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
72. But, if he was wearing a swimsuit, flip-flops, and a sleeveless shirt...
no problemo.

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
75. I can't wait for the class action lawsuit to begin! Because it's so unconstitutional it ain't funny!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
delightfulstar Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
80. Well, that's one method....
There was also the woman who went through LAX in a bikini last month... http://www.nbclosangeles.com/traffic/transit/Traffic-LAX-holiday-travel-thanksgiving-110384004.html

Whatever works, I guess. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
83. We need more of this, not less
Yes, I am angry at Obama's administration for escalating The Crazy.

These searches and pat downs serve NO PURPOSE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #83
96. hey there, Stinky -



Happy New Year!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #83
106. Oh but they do serve a purpose.....
much the way a child molester grooms his target, we are being further groomed to tolerate this crap. People who protest this are written off as crazy. A few sheeple are interviewed saying well, this is actually this is for our own good and gee I feel soo much better now that I have had a frontal lobotomy. :sarcasm:

Think avoiding the airports will prevent you from this rude, illegal search. They are branching out to bus terminals, ferry terminals, large sporting events and concerts. The only thing that makes you a terrorist these days seems to be buying a ticket.

Oh but wait, they now have vehicles that can scan cars driving by and have portable watch towers that they set up in places like small town Walmart parking lots. Like Al Quida is going to attack Bumfuck Arkansas. They are not monitoring for terrorist, they are monitoring the citizens of this country, an armed population that one day may not continue to sit around patiently while their Treasury is plundered, houses stolen, all the while the people they elected to represent them continue to ignore them and pass laws to help the corporate overlords at the peoples expense.

Yes my friend, the purpose is to groom us into submission. I am not prone to crazy, but I know it when I see it. Just like the Jews in the ghettos, we are gradually losing our rights. It is a short hop to the gas chambers or work details my friends, or singling out those that disagree with the approved party line for special attention, and we are whistling their praises as we take it up the butt.

I salute anyone that can come up with a clever and non violent way to protest, since legal redress doesn't seem to be working at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #106
108. Right after 9/11 cars entering the parking lot at my husband's
place of employment, a suburban office park, were stopped and drivers were instructed to open the trunk for inspection. Total bullshit. Bumfuck, Arkansas is right. The chances of that obscure office park being a terrorist target were somewhere in the negative number column, but that didn't stop officious assholes from inconveniencing people. It all stopped after about a week when the rent a cop guard was fired, but it was laughable to begin with.

We need a lot more protest and a lot fewer people flying before this shit is going to be scaled back. I am glad to see this story in the news because the public has a short attention span and needs to be reminded that their government is nothing more than a bunch of paid thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
89. We should all be "disorderly"
Screw them and their insistence on our "compliance". Comply with this, mother-focker! I'm in no mood to be treated as cattle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
93. Good for him. And why was HE cited?
If being naked is the problem, why aren't the machine operators being cited for what they are doing, and the gropers?

They are going to have to get rid of those machines eventually, as soon as people start winning cases in court and more and more people are filing cases now.

They never should have been allowed. But I guess they figured it was worth trying it and making as much money as they could until they have to get rid of them.

Rapiscans. Even the name is cynical. Sometimes I think they do these things to see how far they can push people. 30 years ago they would not have dared to try to introduce such clear Constitutional violations under the guise of 'security'.

But with the drug war having 'softened' Americans up, this is just the next step towards total control and an end to any rights.

But, people like this guy are standing up and that slows down the process a little. Good for him, he is a hero. He should fight that citation also. Who cares if he's naked? I thought that was not an issue anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #93
94. I don't know why he was cited.
Edited on Fri Dec-31-10 06:44 PM by LisaL
Why exactly can't he be in his underwear to show TSA he isn't hiding anything under his clothes? Isn't that what TSA claims it wants to know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watstearns Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
101. This is happening b/c of Congressional failure
Let's reform the campaign finance system so corporate money,
corporate media bias, and corporate corruption of vote getting
and vote counting are nullified.  Here's a petition for that:

http://www.petitiononline.com/PoliTru3/petition.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
110. Can't see London, can't see France--
--until we see your underpants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pam4water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
115. I hope people cheered him on! And not to a strip tease :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC