Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army will evaluate suspect in WikiLeaks Mental fitness for trial at issue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
IScreamSundays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 03:14 AM
Original message
Army will evaluate suspect in WikiLeaks Mental fitness for trial at issue
Source: Washington Times

The Army is assembling a special board to evaluate the mental state of Pfc. Bradley Manning, who is being held on charges that he illegally obtained thousands of classified documents and turned them over to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks in what might be the biggest security breach in U.S. history.

Lt. Col. Robert Manning, an Army spokesman, said Monday that no further legal proceedings will happen until Pfc. Manning is evaluated by what is called a "706 board" and a recommendation is made on his fitness to stand trial.

The Army charged the 23-year-old private in May while he was assigned as an intelligence analyst with a combat brigade in Iraq. Since July, he has been held in solitary confinement in the brig at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia.

"What's happening right now, they are convening a 706 board, which is a board to determine his mental fitness, which was requested by the defense," Col. Manning said. "Because of the nature of the charges, that board is being screened. Once that board meets and determines Pfc. Manning's mental fitness, then they will continue to move forward with the Uniform Code of Military Justice process. That's the first thing that needs to happen, this 706 board. … I don't have a timeline on that."

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jan/3/army-will-evaluate-suspect-wikileaks/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. When are they going to start investigating the crimes
revealed by the leaks? The real crimes. All he did was try to report crimes, so why aren't his superiors who ignored those reports being investigated also?

He is a hero and should be given a medal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. that is a slight lie
He didn't just try to report crimes, he also released a lot of classified information that had nothing in the slightest to do with crimes and as such can't really be defended using that claim.

Had he really wanted to reveal crimes he would only have released the files and cables dealing with the crimes and not gathered a ton of random files to send off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Maybe it was easier to just dump the whole lot of information than
to sort it out. If he is the only person that did it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sancho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. No one knows if he released anything...
there is an accusation from a person who was recently released from a mental institution that the defendant copied and gave files to wikileaks. There is no public record that he really did what the news has assumed that he did...and wikileaks goes to great lengths to collect information without knowing the source. Remember OJ? Sometimes trials don't end in obvious verdicts.

Would you go to trial if the defense is that "I"m a whistle blower of crimes - let me show you!". If there are crimes in the files and if this guy was the culprit, then you can bet that his lawyer will be ready to put the whistle-blower defense on from the start.

Of the quarter million files that wikileaks supposedly has, only 1 per cent are public, so there's no clear crimes evident but clearly the government's reaction (overreaction) seems to point to a fear that some of the files do imply crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. We don't know that. We are told he released the War Video
and probably some of, or all of, war logs. Eg, the information about the U.S. trained Iraqis being handed over Detainees who they then tortured and that the U.S. turned a blind eye. We are told this is why Manning did what he did, he reported those crimes and was ignored.

But no one knows how much of what Wikileaks has was from Manning. Not sure he would have had access to the Embassy cables, eg. But it's possible.

Still, nothing has been done about the crimes seen in the video or whoever is responsible for handing over detainees to be tortured in Iraq. No investigations into who ignored the information he gave them.

Crimes are being committed every day in these horrific wars. If it was our country, our citizens being tortured and murdered eg, we'd view it differently. I don't know why that is, as Iraqi lives are as important as American lives. If constant exposure finally stops these crimes, or even makes them more careful, knowing they can be exposes, then that is what the press is supposed to do.

Had Wikileaks been around before 9/11, as the Federal Agents who tried to warn their superiors have said, it could have been prevented. Or must a real, free press. If we don't like Wikileaks, the way to solve it is to restore freedom of the press and make truth-telling popular again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Moonie Times? Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. Army board to evaluate WikiLeaks suspect
Source: UPI

WASHINGTON, Jan. 4 (UPI) -- A soldier suspected of providing classified documents to the Web site WikiLeaks will be evaluated by a mental health panel, a U.S. Army spokesman said.

The spokesman, Lt. Col. Robert Manning, said the Army is assembling a special "706 board" to decide whether Pfc. Bradley Manning is fit to stand trial, The Washington Times reported Tuesday.


The Army's Manual for Courts-Martial says the board must answer two questions concerning Pfc. Manning's state of mind and mental competence.

"Was the accused suffering from a mental disease that made him unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct?" the manual says. "Is the accused mentally competent to stand trial?"



Read more: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/01/04/Army-board-to-evaluate-WikiLeaks-suspect/UPI-62651294148638/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. how can they have a trial after putting the man in solitary confinement
wouldn't his testimony be in doubt due to psychologically breaking him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The fact that he's been tortured for months should argue for dismissal of any charges....
First the torture him to drive him insane --

they they hold an insanity hearing?

What happened to charges and trials which should have been

the first things to happen -- !!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Tortured?
What trial reached the verdict that he was tortured? What is the evidence? Witnesses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. The evidence is that TORTURE is against military rules ....
and that "isolation" has been found to be torture by all who have studied it --

Doesn't take much intellect to understand that ...

but if you must, lock yourself in your bathroom for a week or so with one magazine --

and let us know how you do.

Oh, yeah -- don't permit yourself any exercise while you're in there -- and imagine

yourself in chains!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Charges filed in July. This hearing is a defense request. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Where do you have info on "charges" against Manning?
As far as I know there haven't been any charges filed --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC