Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Gov) Chafee to Issue Talk Radio Ban

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:25 PM
Original message
(Gov) Chafee to Issue Talk Radio Ban
Source: ABC News

State officials in Rhode Island will soon be ordered to stay off the airways, provided the interviewer happens to be a talk show host.

A spokesman for Gov. Lincoln Chafee tells the Providence Journal that talk radio is essentially “ratings-driven, for-profit programming,” and “we don’t think it is appropriate to use taxpayer resources” to have state employees use work time to “support for-profit, ratings-driven programming.”

Chafee intends to stay off the air, too, reversing something of a trend. His predecessor, Republican Gov. Donald Carcieri, was a frequent talk radio guest, as are many current and former governors and big city mayors across the country.

A former mayor of Providence, who happens to be one of the biggest talk show hosts in the state, sharply disagrees with the governor’s stance.

“Chafee is – I don’t want to be critical – but he’s not exactly Demosthenes,” says Buddy Cianci, who hosts the afternoon drive program on WPRO-AM. “The fact is that he’s got some issues that he maybe doesn’t have the answer to (on the air).”





Read more: http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2011/01/chafee-to-issue-talk-radio-ban.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is a damn interesting argument. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Yeah it is.
I'm not sure quite what to make of it. On the one hand he has a point, but on the other hand it's part of their responsibility to inform the constituency.

:shrug:

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good, Buddy, he SHOULDN'T have answers 'on the air!'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. good for him
Buddy Cianci is the last person who should be talking about anyone's issues

the man is a convicted felon

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddy_Cianci
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forrest Greene Donating Member (946 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Buddy Cianci (see-YAN-see) Is
...of the breed that used to be called "colorful." What I like best about him is his wife's name: NancyAnn Cianci.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. say that fast three times!
LOL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. You'd think public television would be used for pols. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. I always liked Lincoln Chafee
Never could understand why he was a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
littlewolf Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. His daddy was a Republican ... and so he followed
daddies foot steps .... ppl see the name Chafee and pull the lever ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. His Dad, John Chafee was also a USMC Capt front line in Korean War nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Me either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. Same here. Always liked him during Senate hearings
He's better off being out of Congress now anyway. Yet, now that he's an Independent, he could caucus with the Dems.

BUT - I love Sheldon Whitehouse - & I enjoy him during the Senate hearings, even more!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not sure if this is a tenable approach
First, is this limited to radio? And only to "talk shows"? What about public affairs programs? What exactly is the distinction? What about television? Can no public official talk to a television personality? Is the distinction somehow between a "news" person and "talk show" person? What is Jon Stewart? Olbermann? What about the Sunday morning shows? The lines are not black and white anymore.

Second, what about newspapers? They are "for profit" and effectively ratings driven (in the sense that they are advertiser supported and thus the size of the audience is important. Who can state employees talk to? Reporters, but not columnists? Again, how can one draw a clear line?

I understand the sentiment behind the decision, but I question whether its workable in practice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sledgehammer Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. My thoughts exactly
The same would apply to TV and newspapers then. Not the smartest idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. You make good points, onenote.
But I sympathize with the Governor's attempt to starve the Beast. He needs to define his terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. seems to me like kneejerk emotional reaction
I think that getting the message out is the most important thing to do. And this law would probably ban legislators from appearing on THOM HARTMANN's program. Hartmann is a more serious, calm, non-sensationalist radio talk host who interviews people of all political opinions (even hardline free-market apologists and right-wing religious folks). Instead, Gov. Chafee should be advocating for the Fairness Doctrine rather than proposing this ambiguous, possibly unconstitutional law (I bet that the talk radio corporations will be getting out bigwig lawyers waving around the First and Fourteenth Amendments)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
28. He seems to be distinguishing between partisan talk radio, though I'm not sure
how he could really enforce that.

I've always wondered here in Kansas City, whenever they have a Democrat on one of these conservative talk shows they attack them relentlessly, so why would they ever go on there?

I agree with his efforts here, because it is an interesting idea, I agree with you, that they're going to have a difficult time enforcing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. public employees shoud not e talking to any media while on the job period unless their job is media
spokesperson. they are paid to work not blab all over the place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. Nice transparency in government...
I agree on the rhetoric and the antagonizing of violent behavior has got to STOP, but making the federal government recluse themselves from the public does not seem to be a viable option, in my opinion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. They'll just do what the MSM does and begin interviewing each other.
It'll be like having a Rush, Bill'O, Ann Coulter and Hannity roundtable. Ugly, ugly times are ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. I don't know if I like this idea. I'd hate to give up Brunch with Bernie every Friday. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemical Bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. Of course the felon Cianci hates this...
OTOH, I was really happy to hear it.

Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faz Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. Great move!
Also all state employees should not listen to and call hate radios.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. Quoting the article:
Based on the comments, many didn't read the article, so let me highlight this:

The governor’s office has issued a clarification, saying the policy will not apply in “emergency situations,” like impending snow storms. Nor will the rule apply to interviews with news reporters or on the local NPR station, Christian Vareika, a Chafee spokesman said.

"They can not go on TALK Radio" is a different animal than "they can not talk on radio."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WestSeattle2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. I think the distinction is "entertainment" vs. "news" - I'm sure the
governor will be more than happy to hold news conferences and take questions. It's the entertainment side of TV and radio that is the problem. All too many hosts try to be more obnoxious, belligerent, and hateful than their counterparts in order to improve their ratings. They're all chasing the lowest common denominators. What a way to earn a living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
25. Good. They can go on local PBS and skip the Jerry Springer radio tour
I think a boycott of the crap is overdue. Never thought I'd see a pol stop himself, or herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
26. First Amendment? Anyone? Anyone? Buehler? Buehler? Anyone?
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 03:39 AM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melm00se Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. if he fires someone foer this
it will draw an immediate lawsuit and the fired party will probably win.

many folks (left and right)only believe in Constitutional rights when they are used to validate the positions with which they agree otherwise they get tossed on the trash heap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeW Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. not at all
Many federal agencies have press/media offices and officials. There are agencies in which employees are prohibited from

speaking with the press directly without prior approval or authorization when representing their agency or the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Your employer has the right to fire you for whatever they want.
How is this issue a First Amendment issue??

At my job, if I called in to a local radio program and did a 20 minute interview with them during work time, I would be fired as well. It isn't a First Amendment issue, it is an employer not wanting his employee wasting company money on something not work related.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC