|
young man into a "skinhead."
We need to know if shaving ACCUSED prisoners' heads is standard in that county, if shaving CONVICTED prisoners' heads is standard and this was done to Loughner because he clearly wasn't going anywhere, or if--by chance-- he was taken to a barber, in the course of booking him, and ASKED for his head to be shaved and the barber accommodated.
Whose decision was it?
And, if it was Loughner's, it is yet another question about him. Was he "hearing voices" telling him to do things--that is, loonybins? Was he making conscious decisions to become a mass killer and maybe decided that now he should look like one, and join all the other bad guys with whom he was now associated? Was he "programmed" and responding to brainwashing suggestions? It seems a stretch but it IS possible that, if he is some sort of "Manchurian candidate," this was one of the minor commands he was given. And, if it wasn't Loughner's decision, then we have to wonder whose decision it was and why.
It is my understanding that Loughner hasn't spoken a word since the shootings. If so, his request for a head shave would be an opening that no investigator should pass up--and he shouldn't have EVER been out of the investigators' presence during processing.
Perhaps his lawyer could clarify this matter. Was his head shaved against his wishes, or against his lawyer's wishes, or before his lawyer had a chance to say something about it? And if Loughner asked to have his head shaved, why? It is certainly prejudicial against him.
A general question: Who would it serve? (And I don't think the answer to that is obvious or would necessarily be simple--there are a variety of parties, political and legal, who might be served by portraying Loughner as a "fringe skinhead"--including possible "handlers" who want his apparent ravings to be seen as far rightwing--possibly an effort to induce a "liberal" government to be more repressive, incur more rightwing anger and thus to spin our civil life out of control?).
We've got to consider all the possibilities in an event like this. For a long time, when I was young, I thought Lee Harvey Oswald was a "Commie."* Just shows you HOW effective this kind of public narrative disinformation can be.
---------
*(James Douglass' book, "JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died And Why It Matters" is very enlightening in this respect (and in every other respect--what a great book!). The CIA set up the JFK assassination misdirection to Russia as the perps, because they wanted to pressure his successor, LBJ, into nuking Russia. The CIA and the Joint Chiefs were livid at JFK for not nuking Russia while we had the chance--while we still had missile superiority--during the Cuban Missile Crisis. This and JFK's backchannel contacts with Krushchev and Castro, his abhorrence of a potential Armageddon, his firing of the CIA Director after the Bay of Pigs and his vow to "smash the CIA into a thousand pieces," and some other fundamental MIC issues (Vietnam included), were why the CIA decided that JFK was a "traitor" and killed him.
Douglass establishes that LBJ found out almost immediately that the CIA had done it and of their misdirection to Russia, did not want to be pressured into nuking Russia, and thus agreed to and participated in the coverup. Three days after JFK's assassination, LBJ is reported to have said, "Now they can have their war." He was talking about the CIA and Vietnam. Most people think that JFK went along with the U.S. buildup in Vietnam. He did not. And Douglass proves it to my satisfaction. There never would have been a Vietnam War, had he lived--nor an Iraq War, for that matter. Everything would have been changed for the better after the 1964 election and the American peoples' big endorsement of JFK's plan for world peace. LBJ won that election, overwhelmingly--one of the biggest mandates in presidential history--as the "peace candidate." I remember. That was my first vote for president. But LBJ was lying through his teeth. What I got for my peace vote--and what we all got--was over 55,000 U.S. soldiers killed and some 2 MILLION southeast asians slaughtered, before it was all over. JFK would not have been lying. He thought the American people would be with him on world peace--end of all the proxy wars, nuclear disarmament. And we would have been. That's the "why" of "why it matters." It STILL matters.
In any case, when you think of THAT misdirection, that everyone believed--that CIA asset Oswald was a "Commie" and that Russia sent him to kill JFK--Russia, whose Premier was in backchannel contact with JFK on a peace plan--you begin to understand how easy it is to misdirect people and that this is part of the standard toolkit of the CIA. Douglass is simply brilliant on this issue--tracking down every false trail that was laid to Russia.)
|