Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Santa Barbara seeks to turn the tables on the homeless

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 11:22 AM
Original message
Santa Barbara seeks to turn the tables on the homeless
Edited on Fri Jan-21-11 12:15 PM by villager
Source: LA Times

Santa Barbara seeks to turn the tables on the homeless

Cities have tried many ways to move panhandlers and vagrants out of prime shopping districts, but Santa Barbara believes it has a new angle — 90 degrees.

Using $50,000 in redevelopment funds, the city is planning to turn 14 benches perpendicular to the State Street storefronts they now face. The idea is to make it more difficult for beggars to establish contact with passersby, officials said.

"They'll be sitting with their backs to half the people coming and going on the sidewalk," said Marck Aguilar, a supervisor for the city's redevelopment agency. "They'll have half the potential contacts with the public. It might not be financially beneficial for them." To discourage prolonged stays, Aguilar said, workers will also remove the backs from several benches on a two-block stretch of the city's most vibrant commercial thoroughfare.

<snip>

But Ken Williams, a county social worker and impassioned advocate for the homeless, called the idea "rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic."

<snip>



Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-santa-barbara-benches-20110121,0,7575749.story?track=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. In Miami Beach, many benches are nearly flush with the road and have dividers which prevent
someone from laying down and sleeping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. punish and harass the homeless-- that's the ticket....
Sheesh. If panhandling is a problem in a community it suggests that people need alternatives, not fences or other barriers that keep them down even further. WTF is wrong with people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. "Just go away.." is the new social science...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Santa Barbara and opulent suburbs, home to a lot of filthy rich people
including Oprah. Are you reading this Jerry Brown? Property tax the shit out of them especially the out of staters like Oprah and the Arab oil sheiks and you can solve their homeless problem by using the money to shelter and get medical care to those unfortunate people and maybe even balance the state budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zazen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. +10,000. Is SB a third-world urban center?
What's next? Ensuring no cardboard is left in dumpsters lest the pesky homeless create makeshift shelters out of them?

I'm picturing 20% of the better off people pushing through streets of malnourished urchins and cardboard shacks. I thought that only happened in Asia or parts of Latin America. (Oh right--wrong century.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
38. I am seeing homeless panhandlers at the malls here in
Lexington Ky. It doesn't appear they are alcoholics or mentally ill, they are hungry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Do you t;hink they would dig potatoes for the city food pantry?
If given the chance? That is what was done in Ohio when DHL air freight pulled out of Winchester, Ohio, leaving many jobless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. You want the rich elites to dig potatoes for the soup kitchens?
What we need is not slave labor but actual jobs -- and safety nets --

and housing for the homeless!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I would like to buy my deadbeat brother a ticket to Santa Barbara
so that he would quit taking my mother's social security money. I wonder if he could cut it bumming money from someone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. Think Mom's and Dad's have been trying to save a lot of family members....
Edited on Fri Jan-21-11 06:16 PM by defendandprotect
this is also playing a large role in harming the middle class --

and think a lot of family members have also been trying to save other family

members.

We need jobs -- and MEDICARE FOR ALL --

We also need to rethink this property/ownership/dollar bill thing/winner take all/

capitalistic nightmare we're living!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. ??
Think Mom's and Dad's have been trying to save a lot of family members....

this is also playing a large role in harming the middle class --


Is that what you meant to say? It doesn't make any sense.

We need jobs -- and MEDICARE FOR ALL --


That DOES.

We also need to rethink this property/ownership/dollar bill thing/winner take all/capitalistic nightmare we're living!


What sort of alternative do you have in mind?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. You think long term unemployed is 22 million and families aren't trying to help them?
Are you kidding? You really didn't understand that?

It's not just your Mom -- it's many Mom's who are trying to help --

and Dad's -- and sisters and brothers, as well!


We also need to rethink this property/ownership/dollar bill thing/winner take all/capitalistic nightmare we're living!


What sort of alternative do you have in mind?


Well, living under capitalism, I would think the "alternatives" would come trippingly off

the tongue. Downsize capitalism. Reregulate capitalism.

Unregulated capitalism is merely organized crime.

Capitalism is a ridiculous "King-of-the-Hill" system intended to move a nation's wealth and

natural resources from the many to the few -- and it has long done that quite successfully!

The remedies seem clear -- but that said -- we have a corporate government -- and

corporations replacing sovereign governments all over the world.

In other words -- the rise of the Fourth Reich.

Yes -- there had best be alternatives -- plenty of them!








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Can my brother move in with you when Mom dies?
I would like to move and not give him my address.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. heh. Yeah we have a fcking mooch as a roomate now.
We stopped feeding him because he only gave $40 one time since August (in August) toward groceries but always sniffs around at dinner time. He steals beer, liquor and snack food. He has money to buy beer liquor and snack food but takes it to HIS room. His board has been paid by his step-mother for the last six months. He's getting cut off from that as of this month, at the beginning of the lease this was stated as the last she would pay...he's like 60 by the way...well WELL past the time to be supported by Mumzy. I really really hope this ignorant fck who also used the N word around me and suggested we shoot our dog in the head CAN'T come up with the coin on his own. I despise this mooching MFer and want him OUT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. That would bother me a lot
I had a roommate who got in a shouting match with me and grabbed me by the throat. I moved away as soon as I found another place. We had no lease obligation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. He's standing at the stove now. Humming and slurping.
And making those squeaky, scratchy noises with his fork on the plate.....AAARRRGGHHH!!!!!

:grr:

This is, officially, the most annoying man in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. Next time you feed him, tell him it's dog meat after he finishes,
and that you took his advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. He'd probably laugh, actually.
"You killed your dog for me!? THANK-YOU!"

I hate this MFer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #31
51. Only the Part About How Their Trying to Help Family Members Was Harming the Middle Class
Do you mean that many in the formerly-middle class are overextending themselves trying to support their extended family?

I wouldn't have described that as "Harming the Middle Class".


I'm OK with more regulation, but I'm not holding my breath for it (for the same reasons you stated).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. Proposition 13 Makes That Impossible
Can't raise property taxes due to Proposition 13.

Even if you could, it wouldn't inconvenience the wealthy, but a lot of people who are barely hanging on would lose their homes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Actually, Gov. Brown is giving back authority to
local governments to raise the revenues they need to because he can't through Prop. 13. No one really wants to repeal Prop. 13 in its entirety for the reason you state. http://www.scpr.org/news/2011/01/10/governor-jerry-brown-wants-return-authority-and-mo/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Our property tax rates are regulated, but due to high values our property taxes are pretty high
Edited on Fri Jan-21-11 07:02 PM by slackmaster
About #10 among the states compared to income levels.

The middle class in California is one of the most highly-taxed middle classes in the USA. Don't fuck with our homes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #26
34. Proposition 13 only applies to properties
that were owned in 1978 and prior. As soon as they resell, they're reassessed. It seems too many people are under the impression that no one's property taxes have risen since 1978 and that is inaccurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #34
49. But Only When they Sell, and the Tax RATE is still fixed
They can't just jack up the rates on rich people's properties as some have suggested here.
Nor can they arbitrarily reassess property to massively increase the tax bills.
The can reassess property when it is sold, but not before.

They can raise the valuations across the board by a certain amount each year, but that is limited to a small percentage.

There is also a provision for lowering assessments in the event that property values have fallen since the property was purchased.
It is likely that many who bought during the bubble are requesting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. That was kind of the point I was trying to make.
In 1978 my house was probably worth somewhere along the lines of $45,000 and taxes were assessed based on that amount. However, when I bought it in 1999 it was considerably more than $45,000 and the first full year I was here, my property tax was assessed at the new value, not the old one.

I'm just saying that too many people are under the impression that California is broke because of Prop. 13 and no one's house has been re-assessed since then. California is in the financial shithole for a whole lot of reasons and Prop. 13 isn't even in the top 10.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 12:51 PM
Original message
oh fuck me...
god forbid anyone in SB have to "deal" with their poor and less fortunate brethren. can't have Buffy getting upset on her way to buy some expensive-ass thing she doesn't need.

*sigh* what the fuck is wrong with this country? i try to go a day without asking this, but it gets harder and harder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. A *day* without asking? Man, if I get through an *hour* I'm doing okay...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 01:23 PM
Original message
eh, i'm currently an optimist...
i have to be, or i'll go totally mad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. eh, i'm currently an optimist...
i have to be, or i'll go totally mad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Same here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
41. these aren't the "less fortunate" these are the intoxicated and insane
I know the area well,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #41
50. We Don't Do Very Much to Help the Insane in this Country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. No argument from me,
My girlfriend has been assaulted twice by roaming psychos who in more enlightened times would have been permanently institutionalized. The one who was arrested wasn't even homeless but had wandered away from a group home because she wasn't allowed to smoke crack there.

Unfortunately if there is one issue on which progressives and conservatives are in total agreement is that letting the insane roam the streets is preferable to institutional care. Conservatives object to the cost - Progressives object to anyone being deprived of their right to be an intoxicated nuisance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
43. "on her way to buy some expensive-ass thing she doesn't need"
If everybody agrees to buy only what is needed and to not buy anything that is merely wanted, then will there be less unemployment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dupe-delete
Edited on Fri Jan-21-11 12:52 PM by a la izquierda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
handmade34 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. waste of money
how about adding another 2 zeros to that and create suitable housing and jobs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. the upper class and their policians make me ill
they don't want to do anything about homelessness, yet they go out of their way to make them invisible... sounds like a great plan, Elitists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frisbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Not only do they go out of their way to make them invisible...
they go out of their way to create them in the first place. And have become quite good at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. why don't they just ask for permission to just cull them?
that's in essence what they're after. "Our rich, beautiful eyes should not be made to have to look at anyone who is not in our income bracket--in fact, why are they even allowed to be alive????"

Santa Barbara needs to spend that 50K on better outreach programs for the homeless instead of spending it on acting like asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. Deception and cruelty to deal with HOMELESSNESS???
Who are we trying to deceive -- ourselves?

$50,000 for this game-playing which might be used to finance a soup kitchen --

or providing some housing for the homeless??

Disgusting!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. How about actually helping the homeless rather than worrying about stuff like this?
We need mental health services, programs to help with substance abuse, and hey what a concept, decent housing for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. This is like turning up the radio when your car is making a strange noise. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Love it -- !! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
44. What alternative would you propose?
Contacting Ghostbusters Incorporated and asking them to investigate the strange noise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagertolearn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. My brother was homeless there for years until he died of alcoholism
They were always trying to "deal" with the homeless by destroying their camping areas, giving them tickets for sitting on the curb etc... After so many tickets they'd go to jail which cost the state lots of money because they always go through DT's (required to medicate them through this). Instead of jail they should have been forced to go through rehab and check in for daily meds if they were provided shelter and food. Most of these homeless are mentally challenged and need help and to be taken care of. I bet my brother cost the state millions of dollars before he died:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. That headline sure describes a battle of the titans.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. Looks like the freeptards are responding to the LA Times article.
Edited on Fri Jan-21-11 03:47 PM by muntrv
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bergie321 Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
22. We should just cover them with tarps
That will make the problem go away...
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
30. I work in SB and go down town a lot. Those homeless are not a problem.
I give them what change I have. I think we need to see them so we know what the hell is going on in this country.

I remember a line I heard in social studies many long years ago and it was "the invisible poor."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
42. sociologically speaking, "the invisible poor" refers to rural poverty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
35. Are you listening, Oprah?
Let's see how much of a humanitarian she really is since she's got more money than the GDP's in many countries. And they're using Redevelopment Money. Great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NaturalHigh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
37. They want to make things harder for the homeless?
Like the homeless have it so easy now. Do these politicians ever consider that the cheaper (and better) solution would be to spend government funds to end homelessness and institute real employment solutions? For the price of a few cruise missiles, we could put a real dent in the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
39. And this will just move them somewhere else
It won't do anything about jobs, money, homes, or mental health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. Begging doesn't do anything about jobs, homes, or mental health care.
It does something about money for the person who is begging, but at what cost in lost customers to nearby businesses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. The homeless will just beg elsewhere
Near some other businesses, most likely. Alternatively, they might commit some petty crimes if panhandling laws are really effective. Maybe the happy customers might avoiding panhandling, at the price of something worse.

When I was young, panhandling was rare. It really took off during Reagan's era and hasn't looked back. But it could be dealt with constructively again, if the rich would just be willing to share a bit more, via taxes, enhanced social services and better wages for the working and middle classes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
53. This is so disgusting ... I think we need "Most Disgusting Stories" ....
Edited on Sun Jan-23-11 01:21 AM by defendandprotect
just like the "Greatest" --

Had to come back and say that --

Santa Barbara, who is making your decisions for you?



:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC