Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawmakers in Many States Pushing for Abortion Curbs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 07:47 AM
Original message
Lawmakers in Many States Pushing for Abortion Curbs
Source: New York Times

Newly energized by their success in November’s midterm elections, conservative legislators in dozens of states are mounting aggressive campaigns to limit abortions.

The lawmakers are drafting, and some have already introduced, bills that would ban most abortions at 20 weeks after conception, push women considering abortions to view a live ultrasound of the fetus, or curb insurance coverage, among other proposals.

In Florida and Kansas, legislators plan to reintroduce measures that were vetoed by previous governors but have the support of the new chief executives, like ultrasound requirements and more stringent regulation of late-term abortions. “I call on the Legislature to bring to my desk legislation that protects the unborn, establishing a culture of life in Kansas,” Gov. Sam Brownback said last week in his first State of the State message.

“This is the best climate for passing pro-life laws in years,” said Michael Gonidakis, executive director of Ohio Right to Life, expressing the mood in many states. “We’ve got a pro-life governor and a brand new pro-life speaker. Our government now is pro-life from top to bottom.”

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/22/us/politics/22abortion.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. The pro-lifers are not concerned with life, otherwise we would not have poverty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, for fuck sake!
I started this fight in 1971. I can't believe it's 40 years later and we're STILL fighting these misogynist assbites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Of course it would never occur to any of the pro-life pols...
Edited on Sat Jan-22-11 08:02 AM by CBHagman
...to guarantee lifelong health care to anyone who's actually been BORN. As a friend of mine puts it, they're only worried about the time after conception and before birth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. +1
Edited on Sat Jan-22-11 05:21 PM by alp227
"If you're pre-natal, you're good. If you're pre-school, you're fucked!" --George Carlin, "Pro Life, Abortion, And The Sanctity Of Life"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. Great..Just Great....Here come the cockroaches again with their black and white..
...thinking skills.
Gee...I wonder if they have good programs for pre-natal health care for poor women?. Hell NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wait...didn't Roe v Wade already restrict abortion past 20 weeks?
I think part of the problem is education.

I think the Connies have convinced the public that a woman in week 39 of pregnancy can go get an abortion on a whim.

Which is not the case at all.

Late term abortions are only given under dire circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yes. And betcha they hold up Gosnell as an example of "abortion doctor" norms
As opposed to being an example of what the current laws are meant to stop. A state sanctioned back alley abortionist murderer is NOT what any of us are working towards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdadd Donating Member (950 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. I like this statement by George carlin......
Edited on Sat Jan-22-11 10:33 AM by jdadd
"Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers."

edit for typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. They shouldn't be allowed to even consider it until they show they
have the compassion to resolve all the problems that affect children including health care, education, day-care etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. I think these things are heating up again because deep down they
understand that this is their last chance. Repugs are getting old and outnumbered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I suspect you're right about the demographics.
Everything I've ever read suggests the U.S. is one-third self-identified Democrats, one-third Republicans, and one-third independents. But the GOP leadership has been focusing on an extremely narrow subdivision of the party, who can offer little more than the mantra of low taxes, Ronald Reagan worship, and social conservatism. The GOP stance on gays isn't going to increase party numbers, and neither is their approach on immigration. The country has moved on.

The biggest advantages the GOP has right now are Citizens United and the subsequent flood of cash, media consolidation, redistricting, and of course a troubled economy. Of those I think the cash flow and redistricting could cause the most trouble, but as the Republican Party continues to define itself so narrowly, they're not going to be able to perpetuate their numbers, let alone increase them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jxnmsdemguy65 Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yeah, that's all we need - more population!
The maximum carrying capacity of this country - when oil was readily available - is 200 million. We are embracing cataclymsic disaster as it is now with a population above 300 million.

Watch the movie 'Collapse'!

There will be absolute hell to pay for overpopulation now and especially in about 20 to 30 years.

Don't fool with Mother Nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC