Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Food Makers Devise Own Label Plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:53 PM
Original message
Food Makers Devise Own Label Plan
Source: The New York Times

Starting in the next few months, the front of many food packages will prominently display important nutrition information, including calorie, fat and sugar content. The industrywide program was announced Monday by food makers and grocers.

The executives who made the announcement repeatedly invoked the campaign against obesity initiated by Michelle Obama, the first lady, saying they had developed the voluntary labeling plan after she challenged them to help consumers make more healthful food choices.

But in fact, the industry went its own way after months of talks with the White House and the Food and Drug Administration broke down.

The Obama administration wanted the package-front labels to emphasize nutrients that consumers might want to avoid, like sodium, calories and fat. But manufacturers insisted that they should also be able to use the labels to highlight beneficial nutrients, including vitamins, minerals and protein.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/25/business/25label.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Newest Reality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. I want to know about things like:
Genetically modified grains, vegetables, etc.

Hormones and antibiotics used in meats and dairy.

Cloned meats.

They don't want to tell me about these things, do they? They already know what some of us want to avoid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. +1 (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. +2.
They are already free to tell us the facts about anything that moves their fancy. Government regulation is about making them tell us the stuff they do not want to tell us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. "They don't want to tell me about these things..."....exactly....
....they want to, "...be able to use the labels to highlight beneficial nutrients..."

....or to put it another way, they want an opportunity to do more confusing advertisement with distraction....

....I can see it now, '...our vitamin enriched crap is much better for you than our competitors' lesser enriched crap...'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Cloned meats?
Is that anything like a human-mouse hybrid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
targetpractice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. High Fructose Corn Syrup content? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yep, it's in everything, once you start looking. Check out a ketchup
bottle, even.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not to worry. None of this stuff is for people. It is all for "consumers".
The entire article talks about ...consumers.
Who are apparently too dumb to understand that heavily processed foods have no innate nutrition.

fortunately, some of us ...people.....do get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. Food Makers Devise Own Label Plan
Source: NY Times



But in fact, the industry went its own way after months of talks with the White House and the Food and Drug Administration broke down.

The Obama administration wanted the package-front labels to emphasize nutrients that consumers might want to avoid, like sodium, calories and fat. But manufacturers insisted that they should also be able to use the labels to highlight beneficial nutrients, including vitamins, minerals and protein.

The administration concluded that “in the end, the label was going to be confusing, because those things would be included out of context, and it could make unhealthy foods appear like they had some redeeming quality,” said an official who was not authorized to discuss the talks and spoke on condition of anonymity. For example, the official said, “ice cream would be deemed healthy because it would have calcium in it.”


The labeling system was developed by the Grocery Manufacturers Association and the Food Marketing Institute, a trade group that represents retailers, who often contract with food makers to create store brands. The groups said their members, which include a vast majority of food manufacturers and retailers, would begin using the new labels in the coming months. In the fall, they plan to begin a $50 million advertising campaign to promote the initiative.



Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/25/business/25label.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Easier to read than the current nutrition information printed on packages
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. that's a lot of sodium for a daily intake. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. sure- if you have high blood pressure. Otherwise, salt's pretty harmless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC