Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hero intern urging tighter gun laws

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 09:37 AM
Original message
Hero intern urging tighter gun laws
Source: The Hill

Hero intern urging tighter gun laws
By Mike Lillis - 01/24/11 08:50 PM ET

The 20-year-old intern credited with saving the life of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords is urging President Obama to support tougher gun laws in response to the deadly Arizona shootings.

Daniel Hernandez, the intern who rushed to treat Giffords (D-Ariz.) after she was shot Jan. 8 in Tucson, is endorsing a new proposal from Mayors Against Illegal Guns that will require states to report mental-health cases to a federal database designed to screen gun purchases.

He will sit with Michelle Obama on Tuesday when her husband delivers the State of the Union address.

“It is my hope that President Obama and Congress will work together right away to reform our gun background-check system so that all records of dangerous people are in the system and all gun buyers will have to pass a thorough background check,” Hernandez said Monday in a statement.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/house/139861-hero-aide-in-ariz-shooting-backs-tighter-gun-laws
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good for him.
This has got to be addressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Absolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. So he wil now be villainized, I suppose by the gun crowd...
One would think that anyone who lived through what he did would have earned the right to feel this way about guns. But, then look at how Sarah and James Brady and Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy (husband/son victims of Long Island Railroad massacre) are portrayed. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not all are the same
Although I understand where they come from, Brady is intellectually dishonest and is awash in logical fallacies. Congresswoman McCarthy sometimes brings it on herself when she doesn't know what she is talking about. Once I saw her ranting about the super expensive .50 BMG rifle. The rifle itself is worth discussing but in the same press conference she started making absurd statement about heat seeking bullets then something about incendiary rounds. Neither exist, unless she was trying to describe tracer rounds which are not available for civilian or police use and never have been to my knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. James Brady plotted to get shot and he's a Republican
And if she weighs the same as a duck, she's a witch!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good for him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. Unclear if he's endorsing the latest MAIG proposal or what..
The latest MAIG proposal (http://www.observer.com/2011/politics/mayors-push-enforcement-background-checks ) is couched in language purporting to not be an actual change in the law, but buried in their press release is their perennial 'gun show loophole' proposal- which would have had no bearing on the Tucson shooter.

It's already illegal for a convicted felon, someone who has been adjudicated a danger to themselves or others, etc to purchase a firearm.

If MAIG is proposing (and Hernandez is endorsing) making sure that all such records are entered into the NICS, we can agree.

If MAIG is proposing (and Hernandez is endorsing) some new restriction that says someone who is in treatment for any kind of mental illness should have their right to a firearm removed- that'll never fly, if for no other reason than due process.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
8. misleading headline
it sounds like Mr. Hernandez is endorsing more reporting into the NICS. Seems like the same thing after VT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. I have a mental illness and I hope this comes to pass.
I don't have and don't want a gun. I don't care if anyone else has a gun for legal means and are mentally stable but I want to be kept safe from myself. I do have sound judgment 99.9% of the time but when I get into a suicidal state (from severe depression) I don't want access to things that could kill me. I want safety. One thing less - it would help me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. its very noble of you to say this
but we have to ask ourselves what kind of invasion of medical privacy are we willing to accept. Almost no one thinks that mentally ill people should have easy access to firearms, but how do we define/track people who are mentally ill. Would you be okay with having to go to a government employed psychologist/psychiatrist every 6 months and have your status recorded in a govt database? We want to prohibit people who have these issues from buying guns but our civil rights and privacy protections complicate the issue

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC