Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some 9/11 Families Angered by No Apology from Rice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 03:01 PM
Original message
Some 9/11 Families Angered by No Apology from Rice
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Some relatives of Sept. 11 victims responded in anger on Thursday to what they described as the White House's failure to accept responsibility for the 2001 attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people.

Family members were among those in the crowded hearing room to listen to national security adviser Condoleezza Rice tell the 9-11 commission that bureaucratic structure was to blame for the administration's inability to counter the attacks.

"No one wants to take any responsibility. Three thousand people died, and all they want to talk about is structural problems," Bob McIlvaine of Oreland, Pennsylvania, whose son died in New York's World Trade Center.

"They should be ashamed of themselves," he said.

http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/reuters20040408_408.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Clarke did and they liked it, Rice tried to point fingers
and they did not like it. Sounds like Rove did not read the tea leafs right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhereIsMyFreedom Donating Member (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. She repeated over and over
"I took an oath of office on the day that I took this job to protect and defend."

Regardless whether they could have done anything to prevent it, they still failed to "protect and defend" the people of this country. For that, they owe an apology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. One post, huh? Just surfiing and trying to piss people off?
...I'm too tired of people like you to get upset. Isn't Rush on somewhere where you can spend your time better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. You might want to re-think this a bit...
There's quite a large difference between a police chief apologizing for a simple crime and a Presidential Administration that has allowed the worst security lapse in the history of the world to go without even an apology for allowing it to happen.

Additionally, if the police chief's response to a murder was to impose martial law, you might have a bit of a problem with it, but you don't seem to mind that * has done essentially the same thing.

Presidents going back to John F. Kennedy have dealt with terrorist attacks without imposing something as odious as the USA PATRIOT Act on us, but * says it's the only way to address the issue of terrorism. I guess he forgot that WJC managed to fend off multiple simultaneous terrorist attacks from late 1999 until after New Years Day 2000.

No, the real problem is that the Bushistas DOWNGRADED terrorism as a priority, and now want to claim that they didn't down grade it and that there was no way they could have guessed that airliners would be flown into buildings, which is total Bushit, because the French, English Israelis, the Hart-Rudman Commission and the FBI knew better and told them so. I think that they DO owe us an apology for failing to heed MULTIPLE EXPLICIT warnings. They COULD have done more than they did, and in fact standing protocol at the time called for more to be done (such as scrambling fighter aircraft when the airliners stopped communicating and went off course), but in fact, standing orders appear to have been countermanded. At the very least, someone's head should have rolled, but no one in this administration is even responsible for the massive security failure, so no one has been fired!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, they should be ashamed of themselves.
But that would be too much like admitting they screwed up, & they'll never admit to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Her Imperial Smarter-Than-Thouship wouldn't lower herself to doing that.
Heaven forbid ANY of these people ever accept any blame or responsibility for anything they've done. Ever. I don't know about you, but I'm STILL waiting for those adults who were supposed to be "back in charge" when the bushies took office. They have yet to show up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. None of these arrogant assholes think they have anything to
apologize for. Instead, they are amazed that they are being expected to do something with the information and intelligence they receive. They are there for the prestige and the bullying opportunities, not to actually do any work, ferchrissake!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TEXASYANKEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. They should be ashamed.
"They should be ashamed!" should be a rallying cry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. They should be hung
out to dry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Franken today: "I thought the grownups were in charge"
I'm paraphrasing him, but he said

"I thought they told us the grownups were going to be in charge now. Turns out the people wearing blue jeans, eating pizza, and obessing over Al-Aqaida were the real grownups."

LOL! How true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. What happened to "the buck stops here"
Old Harry Truman must have spun right out of his grave by now. Maybe somebody in Missouri should go check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. She did her job
Her testimony wasn't for the families or to arrive at the truth - she did her job by successfully delivering a series of sound bites for right wing radio and TV.

Her testimony was a sham. Most people didn't bother to watch the hearings, so most of what they will learn about the testimony is from sound bites.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. locking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC