Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Board Member of Goldman Sachs and Procter & Gamble Charged in Insider Trading Scheme

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:12 PM
Original message
Board Member of Goldman Sachs and Procter & Gamble Charged in Insider Trading Scheme
Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C., March 1, 2011 – The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced insider trading charges against a Westport, Conn.-based business consultant who has served on the boards of directors at Goldman Sachs and Procter & Gamble for illegally tipping Galleon Management founder and hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam with inside information about the quarterly earnings at both firms as well as an impending $5 billion investment by Berkshire Hathaway in Goldman.

The SEC’s Division of Enforcement alleges that Rajat K. Gupta, a friend and business associate of Rajaratnam, provided him with confidential information learned during board calls and in other aspects of his duties on the Goldman and P&G boards. Rajaratnam used the inside information to trade on behalf of some of Galleon’s hedge funds, or shared the information with others at his firm who then traded on it ahead of public announcements by the firms. The insider trading by Rajaratnam and others generated more than $18 million in illicit profits and loss avoidance. Gupta was at the time a direct or indirect investor in at least some of these Galleon hedge funds, and had other potentially lucrative business interests with Rajaratnam.

Read more: http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2011/2011-53.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Only one of them? Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northoftheborder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. And to think they prosecuted Martha Stewart for her miniscule misdeed, sent her to prison, while...
all these crooks were having fun with their massive corruption which brought down the whole country. Was she supposed to be the "fatted calf"? That ain't right. I was so glad the man who produced "Inside Job" said something at the Awards about the non-justice going on with the fianancial mafiosos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. face it, she was jailed because she was a woman.
And maybe she did not have the cronies on her side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. From what I recall, Martha tried initially to blame her administrative assistant.
Edited on Tue Mar-01-11 02:42 PM by closeupready
So I have no warm fuzzies for her, and she lied to federal officials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northoftheborder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. but you cannot compare her crime with those of the Banksters, who are getting away with it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Absolutely.
Don't get me wrong - I agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. If they
prosecuted all the guilty ones...most of The President's economic team would (should) be in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wonder what this guy did to get on the shit list
so that they are willing to prosecute him for what they all do anyway?

We all know that the SEC has a policy of covering up insider trading and protecting the wealthy who break the rules. This guy is the scapegoat, the example they can point to so that they can claim they do their job while they now let all the other criminals go about their daily crimes with impunity. So we have to wonder who this guy offended, and how, to end up becoming the scapegoat.

More importantly, how do we take down the corrupt system so that the SEC will actually prosecute ALL of the criminals instead of just the occasional scapegoat to make a token example? How do we get them to really, truly clean up wall street and the trading floors so that it is only the exceptions that manage to get away instead of it being only the exceptions that they bother to pursue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Someone must have watched the Academy Awards.
Maybe we will start getting a little tiny bit of justice now that everyone watching the Awards show will have heard about the fact that no bankers have been convicted of the fraud they committed.

Note to the Justice Department: prosecute the fraud while you are at it. It really is not that hard to prove fraud. You just hire huge numbers of paralegals and law students to go through the banks' documents, the mortgage company documents, one loan at a time. Come on now. You can do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. K and R
The subject will not be changed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thav Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's not "insider trading"
It's "being competitive"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. They will be "nailed" with $500 fines and told not to do this again.
Eric Holder will suspend the fine and reimburse their
expenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazylikafox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. So is it time to bring out the guillotine yet?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northoftheborder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Yep, failing that, a huge lengthy sentence without the possibility of
parole.

Prison job? Cleaning toilets with a toothbrush!







(I can dream)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. He'll more likely get time playing tennis in a club Fed.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. Timeline of the insider trading (from the Assiciated Press)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. Keep this kicked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC