Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pirates raid Japanese trawler off Peru

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 04:37 AM
Original message
Pirates raid Japanese trawler off Peru
Source: ABC News

Pirates raid Japanese trawler off Peru
By North Asia correspondent Mark Willacy

Updated 2 hours 56 minutes ago

A Japanese tuna trawler off the South American coast has been boarded by a gang who call themselves the pirates of the sea.

Japanese trawler Kenyu Maru 2 was anchored five kilometres off the Peruvian coast when 20 pirates scaled aboard before dawn.

The gang surprised the 15-member crew, tied their hands and feet and took money, mobile phones and communications equipment before escaping in two row boats.

It is the second time this year that a foreign ship has been raided by the criminals.

Read more: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/03/07/3157022.htm?section=justin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. The open seas are again dangerous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. It might be more appropriate
Edited on Mon Mar-07-11 07:06 AM by dipsydoodle
if Latin American countries themselves carried out pirate raids on Spanish ships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Criminals? How about the guys stealing their tuna?
Five K off the coast is a bit close and puts them in competition with the locals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Do you have any evidence that the tuna operation was not lawful?
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. If I can see your factory fishing trawler from the beach, you're not in international waters. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Proof?
Do you have proof what you're saying and proof that the trawler didn't have the right to be there? And even if you did, do two wrongs now make a right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. See: Somalia nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. So the answer is no.
And the Somalia reference is BS too. The toxic waste dumping excuse is a fabrication for suckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Let's assume you are correct. Does that necessarily mean the tuna operation was unlawful?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. No, as far as I know, the current government of Peru is as corrupt as ever.
They'd sell out their own people for the yen every damn time and let them starve for lack of fish (or anything else they could sell off).

The few Peruvians I know are upper-class, right wingers from hell, and have no sympathy for their countrymen. It's a "Let them eat cake" state of mind across the ruling class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. People will fall for anything
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. The result would have been different had they targeted my commercial fisherpeople friends
They are always heavily armed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. Take a look at the site and map - land is at the bottom.
Edited on Mon Mar-07-11 11:08 AM by peacetalksforall
This post meant for slackmaster

Take a look at the map and the site.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_waters

12 nautical miles is about 13.8 miles.
5 kilometers (from the article)is about 3.1 miles.

If I have that right - they were within Peru's water.....

i.e., they were within Peru's territorial waters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Let's assume they are in Peru's territorial waters
Does that necessarily mean the tuna fishing operation is unlawful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Do you want people to do your work for you. It appears you are trying to say that it
is legal - so dig down and give us the link to prove yourself.

slackmaster is your user name. hmmmmmmm!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I'm responding to reply #4 in which another user advanced a specific claim
Edited on Mon Mar-07-11 01:44 PM by slackmaster
A claim that is empirically testable, and the burden of proof is on the person who made the claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. The onus is upon the person making the claim- and so far, all we have is a claim.
Any claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC