Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FAA: No more emergency oxygen in airplane lavatories

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:53 PM
Original message
FAA: No more emergency oxygen in airplane lavatories
Source: MSNBC

Citing security concerns, the federal government in secrecy last month ordered every airline in the United States to remove emergency oxygen in every lavatory on all 6,000 domestic commercial aircraft.

Under Air Worthiness Directive 2011-04-09, made public this week, the Federal Aviation Administration directed all airlines to disable the lavatory oxygen generators to "eliminate a potential safety and security vulnerability.”

That means that if there’s a sudden loss of cabin pressure, now only those passengers at their seats will have oxygen flowing to the masks that drop down from the ceiling.

“I’m in shock,” said Kate Hanni, executive director of Flyersrights.org, a nonprofit airline passengers' rights organization. “We get reports of mid-air decompression events all the time. So now going to the bathroom on a commercial flight can kill you? I’m panicking just thinking about this.”

Read more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42015889/ns/travel-news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gives new meaning to the phrase
"Shit out of luck."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. lol! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's going to be one security "patch" after another, forever, at this rate. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
targetpractice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Any data about how often "emergency oxygen" saved lives?
Seriously... How many people have been saved because of "seat cushion flotation devices" or "drop down oxygen masks" after a plane crash? Those things seem pretty theoretical to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. True enough...
I am done with the "lectures" at the beginning of each flight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Maybe one every year or two
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncontrolled_decompression

Scroll down for table of events

========
. . .
TAM flight 9755 2001 Fokker 100 Accident 1/82 Rapid decompression Window ruptured by shrapnel after engine failure<24>
China Airlines Flight 611 2002 Boeing 747-200B Accident 225/225 Explosive decompression Metal fatigue
Helios Airways Flight 522 2005 Boeing 737-31S Accident 121/121 Gradual decompression The pressurization system was set to manual for the entire flight, resulting in a failure to pressurize the cabin.<25>
Alaska Airlines Flight 536 2005 McDonnell Douglas MD-80 Incident 0/140 + crew Rapid decompression Failure of operator to report collision involving a baggage loading cart at the departure gate. Decompressed at 26,000 feet
Qantas Flight 30 2008 Boeing 747-438 Incident 0/365 Rapid decompression<26> Fuselage ruptured by explosion of an oxygen cylinder
Southwest Airlines Flight 2294 2009 Boeing 737-300 Incident 0/126 + 5 crew Rapid decompression 1 square foot (0.1 m2) hole blown in fuselage during flight.<27> Metal fatigue
===========
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Google News is more helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. August 8, 2001 - MD-82 over West Virginia at 35,000 feet (I was the captain)
Edited on Fri Mar-11-11 08:08 PM by DemoTex
146 pax + 4 FAs + 2 pilots

Subtle decompression that was not detected by the CAWS (Central Aural Warning System). Compounding the problem for the passengers, the oxygen masks did not deploy automatically. In other words, multiple simultaneous system failures on the MD-82.

My first officer deployed the masks manually, and I did an emergency descent from 35,000 to 10,000 feet (spoilers deployed and speed at the barber-pole). A passenger in the lavatory in such a descent would have a hard time making it out of the lav, much less back to a seat or to a flight attendant with a portable O-2 bottle. We landed at Pittsburgh with some frightened peeps in the cabin, but not a scratch on anyone.

My guess is that the pilot unions like ALPA will raise the bullshit flag high on this one. I know that I would never leave the gate without a passenger oxygen system that was 100% functional (or MEL'd with appropriate precautions), including lavatories. If a lavatory oxygen system were inop, that lav would be locked for the flight if other lavs were available with oxygen.

The FAA also needs to think about a scenario where one of the cockpit crew makes a necessary visit to a lavatory in-flight. What if there were an explosive decompression and that pilot becomes incapacitated in the oxygen-less lavatory? Do they really want a solo pilot handling a decompression emergency?

On edit: Pressurization malfunctions and loss of pressurization are much more common than you might think. I would guess one or two per day in the US. Most, like my pressurization emergency, have a happy ending and never make the news.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Hello? This year:
Edited on Fri Mar-11-11 07:45 AM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. BOKYAGB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why don't they just outlaw planes and be done with it?
I mean... really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marybourg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. I was on a plane that had a "decompression event." The masks
did come down. No-one put them on. Not even the flight crew. Everyone was just thrown over the seat in front of them screaming (soundlessly) as the plane dove down to 10,000 ft (from 33,000). Everyone survived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. I read they are doing this because they could be easily used to cause a sudden fire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheEuclideanOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I support it 100%. Applaud it actually.
I did not read the link, but assumed that it was something similar to that. The reason that I am happy to hear this news is that it is the first time I heard a security suggestion that did not involved something that already happened. All of the "After the fact" fixes seemed like a waste to me.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bette Noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Something did happen, recently.
Sorry I don't have a link, but I heard on the radio within the last two weeks that someone faked GI distress and spent the whole flight in the head with the door locked. After landing, it was discovered that the cargo hold had been entered through the head, and much money that was being transported as cargo was missing.

I found a link, but not a convincing one: http://www.travelmonitor.com.au/news/weird-news/airline-passenger-stages-daring-robbery-from-the-toilet.html Maybe the whole thing was a rumor, or a hoax. Given the timing, though, I think it may have been the inspiration for the new restriction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
12. “We get reports of mid-air decompression events all the time."
Huh?

Really? From where? Who? What carrier?

I currently work for a LARGE airline and I haven't
heard of any decompressions.

Come on lady...give us the specifics of Who, What, Where and When.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Indeed...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groundloop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. That's not a bad move....
It wouldn't be difficult to cause some serious chaos with an oxygen bottle and something flammable.

As far as “We get reports of mid-air decompression events all the time. So now going to the bathroom on a commercial flight can kill you? I’m panicking just thinking about this.” - I call BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. There is no "Oxygen Bottle"
They use Oxygen generators, which produce Oxygen as a result of a chemical reaction, triggered by a pressure drop, when the device is triggered.

Now if there is a generator device in the lav that could be triggered manually, that would be something to remove. If they are merely remove the mask and tubing that pipes the O2 in from a device located out of reach from the lav, it's just another "We want you to feel safe because we are doing something."

I suggest that they also relocate the Flangistan valves out of the reach of the passenger compartments, such that they could not be manipulated by a terriast. That will keep us safe. That being said, relocating the valves will require all attractive people between the ages of 21 and 30 to fly topless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. I'm not worried
I've flown on about 50 flights per year for over 20 years. Never had a decompression event. Compared to the real risks of flying this is negligible. If someone is "panicking just thinking about this", they wouldn't even dream of getting in the shower to get ready for the flight or drive to the airport. Two things that have a higher chance of killing you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. I have been on thousands of car trips without an accident
But that doesn't mean car accidents don't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
19. Well, I guess is any of the bad guys hadn't considered igniting oxygen in the rest rooms,
they know about it now. Happy flying everyone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
21. As long as they don't remove the gas masks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. Next up ...
eliminating fuel tanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gtar100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
23. Typical conservative / repug type of solution to a problem.
I've heard other ideas for enhancing security, but this is what they come up with to implement.

They must feel clever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeW Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
24. Im worried ... sometimes you need it to breath depending on whos been in there before you
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PfcHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
26. They'll have to pass out diapers because nobody will leave their seats
to use the toilet now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC