Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Danielle Deaver Denied Abortion Even as Uterus Crushed Fetus

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 10:48 AM
Original message
Danielle Deaver Denied Abortion Even as Uterus Crushed Fetus
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 11:58 PM by RamboLiberal
Source: ABC News

Danielle Deaver was 22 weeks pregnant when her water broke and doctors gave her a devastating prognosis: With undeveloped lungs, the baby likely would never survive outside the womb, and because all the amniotic fluid had drained, the tiny growing fetus slowly would be crushed by the uterus walls.

"What we learned from the perinatologist was that because there was no cushion, she couldn't move her arms and legs because of contractures," said Deaver, a 34-year-old nurse from Grand Isle, Neb. "And her face and head would be deformed because the uterus pushed down so hard."

After having had three miscarriages, Deaver and her husband, Robb Deaver, looked for every medical way possible to save the baby. Deaver's prior pregnancy ended the same way at 15 weeks, and doctors induced her to spare the pain.

-----

Just one month earlier, Nebraska had enacted the nation's first fetal pain legislation, banning abortions after 20 weeks gestation. So the Deavers had to wait more than a week to deliver baby Elizabeth, who died after just 15 minutes.


Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Health/20-week-abortion-ban-nebraska-oklahoma-fetus-feel/story?id=13116214



I'm sick of these fools in the Repub party without medical degrees denying a woman the right to choose and putting her in medical risk for the R's religious and pandering to the fundies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. somebody needs to go to jail for this cruelty. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. next time i see that visit nebraska commercial I think I'm going to
have an extra image in my head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. And the uterus contracting on the baby wouldn't cause the fetus pain?
I have a headache listening to these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsPithy Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. If the prevention of "fetal pain" is now the standard,
then all vaginal deliveries are against the law. Imagine the pain involved with your head being squeezed through a hole so small it deforms the shape of your skull.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Edited: Did ABC news get the year wrong in the dateline?
Edited on Mon Mar-14-11 11:02 AM by Pacifist Patriot
It looks like a year old story, but when I googled her name I did get articles from this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah I think they blew the date
I think the legislation is just a month old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. God's will and all, you know.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. that's exactly right, pat robinson was praying for the fetus to live
but god was watching cbn at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
52. Or Real Housewives of Hell. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
43. Yeah, God's "plan"
I believe Sharron Angle and Michelle Bachmann have riled on about "The Plan."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patchuli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
53. On the contrary,
it sounds to me like if all the efforts had not been made to continue it, the pregnancy would have ended on its own.

God did not cause that pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jemelanson Donating Member (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. There is no mercy, no compassion, and no reason, in this law or
the things that brought it into being. They do not deserve to be called persons. They have no humanity and they are much worse than any animal and being that they do not qualify as a plant or rock then the only description left for them is thing. They have no souls and they have no humanity. Waste of flesh and air. They are useless, ugly bags of water.

Not only did they condemn these parents but the unborn child also to unneeded risk they also prolonged the suffering that each had do endure. There was no amount of time or care that was going to make for a better outcome. This only increased the medical bills and the pain and suffering.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. They do not deserve to be called persons
No they don't. They should be called ignorant children for not accepting reality and bucking up to the indifference of Nature and the necessity of unpleasant things like abortions. Stupid, know-it-all children who think they can legislate the world into a Rainbow Bright fantasy where everything is all nice and just like their back yard.

Fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vim876 Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
57. Leave Rainbow Brite outta this. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. This really isn't about the right to choose.
There was no 'choice', only medical prognosis and advice. This is the denial of medical care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. This is the denial of medical care to WOMEN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. Bingo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. fetal pain law???? yeah, and I'm sure the baby felt NO PAIN while
being crushed to death and felt no terror as she suffocated after birth.

What a truly compassionate law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. The right-to-lifers only care about the fetus
This is a good example of that warped reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. they don't even care about that
only about controlling women - and these are the same nut jobs worried about Sharia

idiots

evil fucking idiots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Twisted evil idiots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SomeGuyInEagan Donating Member (872 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
38. Agreed. They only care about controlling others, regardless of pain or tragedy inflicted.
Truly twisted, evil people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #18
51. Actually, they might cite controlling the woman as a necessary evil

. . . or irrelevant compared to stopping the state from "sanctioning murder."

And please, I'm not supporting them, I'm extremely pro-choice, but nothing is gained by mis-characterizing their beliefs, nor by trying to argue with or expose their subconscious motives. If they're unconscious motives, they can't be argued with. They can only be defeated. They can be rallied against though.

There's only one way to defeat it, and that's by repetition. I would preface any argument against abortion with "The fetus is not a person" or "The fetus is not a human being . . ." and would put that message in as many times in as many arguments as I could. That is the only way to win this. Find the simple, basic message, stick to it and repeat it. Something clearer and less absurd than "Life begins at conception."

I hate to say about forming ideas, human psychology is that simple.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. People play God, in the name of rescuing babies. Who are they to decide mom's life is
less important than embryo's life, or fetal pain from abortion is better for embryo (and mom) than fetal pain from something like this? Power hungry control freaks AND, in their own belief system, breakers of the first commandment and the same sin Adam and Eve committed-seeking to be God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
13. Grand Island, Nebraska; not Grand Isle.
I know it's not the OP's error. Just had to correct it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
14. I posted this to Twitter and got THIS reply back...
Edited on Mon Mar-14-11 11:47 AM by Ian David
@IanDavidB That is untrue about Danielle Deaver's baby being crushed. She said her baby was PERFECT with long eyelashes & beautiful #prolife
http://twitter.com/lifepeeps/status/47335810609070080


However, even the anti-choice websites agree that the baby died a hideous death outside the womb...

http://prolifeaction.org/hotline/2011/deaver/#more-12947

And even THAT site does NOT say their baby was born beautiful and perfect.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lakercub Donating Member (509 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Wow
that anti-choice website is horrible. You're right, at least they admit the child would have been screwed, but everything else they say is just disgusting. They criticized the parents every chance they got...and they love the word murder. Yikes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I'm still waiting for the dude to document that what he said was true. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
39. Here's what the asshole finally sent me...
Edited on Mon Mar-14-11 03:48 PM by Ian David
Her baby wasn't expected to live, but Nebraska law banned abortion
Law didn't allow couple to end pregnancy: Danielle and Robb Deaver knew their baby had little chance of survival, but Nebraska law prevented them from having the choice to end the pregnancy.


Deaver, 34, of Grand Island, Neb., wanted to see something, anything to validate the news doctors delivered eight days before: Her baby had virtually no chance of survival. And if she lived, she would be severely disabled.

What Deaver saw was perfection: A tiny but beautiful child. Ten toes. Ten fingers. Long eyelashes.

Her baby tried desperately to inhale.

<snip>

Her life struggle, 15 minutes outside the womb after 23 weeks and five days of gestation, was over.

"Our hands were tied," Danielle Deaver said. "The outcome of my pregnancy, that choice was made by God. I feel like how to handle the end of my pregnancy, that choice should have been mine, and it wasn't because of a law."

More:
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20110306/NEWS10/103060331/1001/

And this, is what the "pro-life" people think SHOULD have happened.


# .@lifepeeps The woman rightly blames you for prolonging the suffering of her AND her baby. http://goo.gl/IG8Uu #ProChoice #ProLife half a minute ago via web



# @lifepeeps Unfortunately, eyelashes, fingers and toes are a poor substitute for lungs, and people like you prolonged her baby's suffering 4 minutes ago via web in reply to lifepeeps




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
15. They don't give a shit about fetal pain, or anything else about the fetus
All they care about is that the fetus is not present to argue with them, to deny them their outrageous claims supposedly on behalf of the fetus.

Because they realize that they would lose their arguments to fetuses, if they were capable of arguing back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. this goes on across america..
my friend and his wife went through the same thing in illinois
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. "Pro-life" insanities are not about medicine, they're about controlling women and reproduction --!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jacquelope Donating Member (364 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
58. Why don't they protest the war against health care for babies?
When Republicans cut budgets for care for poor sick children where are the pro-lifers then?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
22. What a wonderful country in which we live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
23. Republican Politicans Standing Between
you and your doctor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smuglysmiling Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
25. She should testify to those lawmakers...
and they should be forced to watch video of the 15 minutes of torture their decisions created.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeliQueen Donating Member (433 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
26. This is the reason abortions should be called "medical miscarriages".
Mrs. and Mr. Deaver should sue each and every politician who voted for this atrocity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
28. Most Churches are corporations
since "Citizens United" is now "Law", can they use their "money voices" as free speech also?
I did post this on another O,P, and I really do not know the answer....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackspade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
29. heartbreaking.
What a crap-tacular law that is.
Another fundie-idiot law that inflicts unnecessary pain on everyone from the mother/fetus/father to the medical personnel whose hands are tied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
14thColony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
30. It's getting hard to tell which book the Rs are following
Is it Mein Kampf or The Handmaid's Tale?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
james0tucson Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
31. Why didn't they leave Nebraska?
Seems like medical treatment could have been had one state over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. Maybe they couldn't afford to, or maybe the mother's health was too fragile to travel.
They shouldn't have had to anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. One state over? Kansas? South Dakota? Wyoming? Iowa?
I don't think that any of those states are known for state-of-the-art late abortion facilities. In fact, when the doctor who performed these was murdered a few years ago, news reports said that he was one of the last in the country willing to take the risk. It was predicted that even in states where it's still legal, parents would not be able to get the health care they needed to avoid this pain, suffering, and risk of death.

Add to this the difficulty of packing up and moving temporarily to another state, taking a leave from work (if that is even possible), the fact that health insurance coverage would almost certainly be denied by going out of state, the fear and risks associated with leaving their health care provider and seeking care during a health crisis with practitioners who don't even know them, the probable risk to the health and possibly life of the mother to travel at this time....

It's easy enough to say "go someplace else."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
32. Sheer evil
The first time a man got pregnant, this legislation would be hurled out of the window. The people of Nebraska should be ashamed of their legislators that something like this would happen in their state - that a woman would be forced to miscarry her baby and watch it die.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tumbulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
33. Can't the medical community change the name of
these procedures?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #33
50. I think our legal system has that maneuver covered. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
41. I'm sick of the party that wants LESS Government telling women they cannot have certain healthcare
procedures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. exactly
this is the same party that bans sex toys in Alabama, has dry counties, still, and thinks that god hates the same people they do.

if god didn't want people to have sex toys, she wouldn't have invented them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. And because I DO want people to have sex toys,
I DID invent them.




Tansy Gold, who is a goddess like every other woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. You did that?
Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #41
54. CORRECT
THEY WANT GOVERNMENT SMALL ENOUGH TO FIT INTO VAGINAS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #41
60. as I've always said, "sticking their noses in our private parts"
ewwwww----images of Boner et al doing that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwishiwas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
45. The fetus probably died a slow dead by suffacation! If you
believe that the fetus does have pain at that gestation!! (and if you read the entire article-the "evidence" is spotty)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
46. Too far along to seek help across the state line?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
48. she belongs in prison
how dare she break her water. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
49. But at least it wasn't in pain!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenrr Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
55. I'm TOTALLY pro-choice but....
I ask myself after 3 miscarriages and one bad ending, why get pregnant again?
Why not adopt?

Which is not at all to deny that this was a highly horrible situation made so by anti-choice fascists
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. I had a friend who had many miscarriages before giving up hope...
I didn't understand why she put herself through it, but I think she had issues as me having an Oops! pregnancy and not being over the moon about it made her really ferocious and aggro at me, so I cut contact and heard from another friend a few years down the track that after what seemed like endless miscarriages she finally got the idea and got resigned to having the two children she already had...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #55
62. I think more people would adopt if it didn't cost so much.
One couple I know paid $50,000 by the time they got through. That was for an infant.

Another couple I work for has been trying to adopt. She told me the fee is right around $40,000.

That's awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
59. the sequel: women dying after trying to abort with coat hangers
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
61. Appalling.
I'm horrified for this family. Antichoicers are disgusting, woman killing bigots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC