Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. launches first missiles against Gadhafi forces

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 02:55 PM
Original message
U.S. launches first missiles against Gadhafi forces
Edited on Sat Mar-19-11 03:09 PM by Turborama
Source: CNN International

By the CNN Wire Staff
March 19, 2011 4:04 p.m. EDT

Tripoli, Libya -- The U.S. military has launched its first missiles in Libya against Moammar Gadhafi's forces, a senior Defense Department official said Saturday.

Earlier, French fighter jets deployed over Libya fired at a military vehicle on Saturday, the country's first strike against Moammar Gadhafi's military forces who earlier attacked the rebel stronghold of Benghazi.

U.S. Tomahawk missiles have landed in the western area around Tripoli and Misrata, the American military official said.

"He's clearly been on the offensive," the official said of Gadhafi. "He said that he was going to do a cease-fire and he continued to move his forces into Benghazi."

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/03/19/libya.civil.war/index.html



Ironically, I was listening to the report about this on Al Jazeera English and the only online article about it at the time was on Faux.

Al Jazeera English are reporting that the message coming out from the ongoing Pentagon briefing they are at is "America is going to be taking the leading role" until the coalition coalesces (paraphrasing).

Link to live stream in my signature line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BadGimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Praying for the safety of our men and women in uniform.
and for there to me no or minimal collateral damage or death ...

here we go again..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fox News? Just found article on CNN.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks a lot! Fixed.
Phew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TMcCaleb Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. wow
Edited on Sat Mar-19-11 03:17 PM by TMcCaleb
As if we arent envolved in enough quagmires........what bs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Great, this war will absolutely wreck the economy.

If four dollar gas, Japan cashing its bonds, disruption in trade supply from Japan, rising food prices, disruption in oil supplies and two other wars don't. I think I forgot a few things.

Ironically, this is an intervention that has a good justification, even if its still unconstitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forty6 Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Actually, it may, in the end HELP the oil markets, and thus...
HELP the economy worldwide, one month from now, or five years from now, whenever Libya becomes a free nation able to stabilize herself and her oil resources. Hussein tried to set his and Kuwait's wells on fire, as a desperate move... hoping that doesn't happen here, but in the end, the oil must be pumped to European and worldwide markets...the real reason for this war.

Of course, it would be nice if more people are freed from an insane dictator...as a benefit as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. it would be nice if more people are freed from an insane dictator
Yes, but Scott Walker cannot be recalled for a year.


Oh, wait, you meant........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forty6 Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. Good one! Yes, let's get rid of Walker and send him to Libya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. There's going to be agitation from Khadafi supporters for months.

The rebels are going to be identified with colonial powers, crusaders and US. Plus, this is a highly tribalized society, similar to Afghanistan in that way, meaning that factions are going to be extremely divided. This is likely not going to last a month.

The Libyans are going to notice how quickly the world comes to the aid of an oil country where the supply is threatened. That will moderate their thanks to all.

Finally, I don't know what we'll gain from doing this to "help" the world oil supply that we didn't have with Khadafi already. In other words, we're trying to get back to the oil supply we had before, not increase it. This is a stoploss in economic terms.

In humanitarian terms, however, it's like Kosovo or Bosnia. We have to do it. Just don't expect it to improve things.

And in Constitutional terms, Obama his wiping his mouth with it. Then again, several other presidents do the same. I'd just wish they'd finally amend the Constitution to reflect the reality of Executive War. Otherwise, it makes the Constitution look like fishwrap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Hahaha FOUR dollar gas? Hang onto your ass...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
44. SELF-DELETED BY MEMBER
Edited on Sat Mar-19-11 11:18 PM by wordpix
This message was self-deleted by wordpix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #44
59. I did notice how quickly a 'humanitarian' intervention came with oil involved.

I mean, where was the 'help' for Sudan?

But admit it: oil companies wouldn't be the only ones suffering from a prolonged drop in production. $5-$6 gas would create widespread pain for people far away from the oil industry. And I'm not just talking about us. With food prices high worldwide, and food production and delivery dependent on oil, you're talking famine in some places.

In fact, everyone is already hurting from this war in the form of inflation.

It's just too bad the protesters couldn't sweep Kadhafi away in a few weeks as they did in Egypt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Gang warfare
took several lives in this area last week! Oh - wait - we don't give a shit when it happens inside our borders. Never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. non-combat cruise missiles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmzzll Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. No blood for oil!
What the heck is going on here? We have no national security interests in Libya. There's no point to intervening in a third world civil war. We're already involved in two illegal wars, now the President wants to stretch out our military into a third conflict. It's none of our business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
U4ikLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
31. Welcome to DU!!!
Good first post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paper Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Here we go again, I'm disgusted. Cannot we mind our own
business for once? We need to take care of the home front, not BUT into the events in the rest of the world.

Shoot, I am mad, can you tell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheLastMohican Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. The enablers of Obama and Bush
cant wait, the need the war NOW.
There is not much difference between the warmongering republicans and democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
34. Well we minded our own business when genocide was committed in Rwanda,
and 800,000 people died. Sometimes the international community must act to prevent slaughter of innocent people who can receive no help from within their own country. In this case I think it is moral that we are not minding our own business. And I am not going to be xenophobic enough to think that the only events of any importance happening in the world take place on the "home front."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
39. +1 and our so-called "leaders" never learn about these quagmires that we "must" enter
My daughter moved to Canada 9 yrs. ago and never looked back. All I can say is, she made a great decision. How sad for the US that it's come to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
61. This IS business. 'Gotta blow up the old and dusty bombs/missles so's we can make more. '
The military industrial complex will survive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenzoDia Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. Can I get a receipt for each missile fired?
I like to keep track of all of my expenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. $575K per unit.
X 112 units= $64,400,000

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenzoDia Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. Oh wow thats a big number. Thanks for the info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #25
69. is that with or without the missiles that the brits fired? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kaddafi may as well give it up right now. He stirred up a hornet's nest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tcaudilllg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #13
62. I don't think the rebels have much of a chance against his amazons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. WOW. Gotta give the WAR Profiteers credit.
THAT is the fastest Mission Creep I have ever witnessed!

From "No Fly Zone".....to full on ground bombardment (with the accompanying killing of innocents) in less than 24 hours!
Full Race Mission Creep

Campaign Corks are popping in the Armaments Industry Boardrooms today!
BIG Bonuses will be had for the privileged few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yeah, life is cheap. Now if we could just have that power to
stop wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Well you see, in order to enforce a no-fly zone we have to raze every last scrap of anything on the
ground that looks like maybe, sorta, might shoot back at us.

Especially children gathering firewood. You never know when one of them has a MANPAD. Better to be safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
35. The ground bombardment is necessary to take out defense systems that could fire at
planes enforcing the no fly zone. And such action was authorized by the UNSC. This has to do with protecting the people of Libya from a genocidal maniac and it is not intended to feather the nests of war profiteers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. "not intended to feather the nests of war profiteers"---Really? Read this (and 2+2 =4):
Summary: Rebel uprising causes oil corps. to lose "experts" and laborers, and there's a "huge drop" in production. Suddenly, the UN acts and the US will head operations to "urge" Gaddafi to leave. Sounds like an OIL WAR to me.

http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9M2AD7O0.htm


Libya oil chief says country still honoring deals


TRIPOLI, Libya

The head of Libya's national oil company says the country is honoring all its commitments and trying to recover from a huge drop in production due to a rebel uprising against ruler Moammar Gadhafi.

Shukri Ghanim told a press conference in Tripoli Saturday that production had dropped because foreign experts had left oil fields, which were then looted.

He said most of the oil fields had been "restored," but and asked foreign companies to send their laborers back to Libya. Thousands fled the country following the outbreak of the uprising last month

Gadhafi has violently repressed all signs of dissent and sent forces to capture rebel-held towns and oil fields. Regime forces were striking the rebel stronghold of Benghazi Saturday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #35
54. Yes. I explained all that on DU yesterday...
...when the War Mongers insisted that a "No Fly Zone" wouldn't involve civilian casualties,
and there was no possibility of "Mission Creep".


Now, 24 hours later, we have creeped all the way to
"Yeehaa....Take him out!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cognitive_Resonance Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. Good. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. Mexico will be next
more people have die in Mexico than in Lybia



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tcaudilllg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #19
63. Syria will be next.
Hell, Syria is where we should be! Assad is absolutely brutal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diveguy Donating Member (117 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. 112 cruise missles for 20 targets
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/lt_libya_obama

I bet more innocents died due to american missles today than dickhead killed all week. Fire another missle, we must have peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. $64,4000,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. What a shame we have no money for healthcare for the young and elderly,
housing, and more jobs.

But what the hey! Grab a flag and start wavin' or yur next!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diveguy Donating Member (117 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #29
52. aint that the damn truth
how many patients would 64 and a half million bucks cover?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #29
66. We got a 3rd war to pay for, can't afford health care for the citizens who are paying for the war.
Can't afford food for our hungry children because their parents are paying for a 3rd war. We've got another war to pay for and can't afford housing for the homeless, or heat for the elderly, or a decent education for our children, or pensions and retirements. We got another war and now President Obama can declare he is a war president.

We can't pay for our own well-being but we sure can pay for their wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
21. oh geez. :( Didn't know it was at that point.
Edited on Sat Mar-19-11 04:37 PM by tigereye
That's not good. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faz Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. Shame on Obama administration

Is that GW Bush in the White House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. yes it is. pretty much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pterodactyl Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #23
60. It's totally different! Obama is not Bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
24. But, hey!, they're cheap ($575K a pop).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
27. It's about time.
Libyan women and children were having their skulls blown apart by multi-barreled 23mm anti-aircraft cannons being fired down streets into peaceful protesters. Gaddafi was executing generals who refused to do that by tying their hands behind their backs and burning them alive with flamethrowers.

I've been a pacifist my whole life, but I'm wholeheartedly in favour of this action. It's about time the civilized world grew a conscience and a backbone simultaneously and stepped in on the side of the oppressed. "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Not this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinee Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
42. sure. and there are still WMDs hidden in Iraq too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. Imagine you were one of these men
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinee Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. it's war propaganda to justify blood for oil. NO MORE BLOOD FOR OIL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. No it's not.
Edited on Sun Mar-20-11 01:28 AM by GliderGuider
The casus belli in this case is extremely well documented by Libyan citizens with cell phone cameras. they have asked for a no-fly zone since the beginning, and they finally got it. As others have pointed out, there was no reason to intervene on the side of the rebels to secure oil supplies. International oil companies were already happily working in Libya. If any intervention was going to be done to secure oil supplies it would have been on the side of Gaddafi against the rebels, as Silvertongue Burlesque-oni wanted at the beginning.

This one looks to me like it's straight-up about human rights being trampled by an embarrassing madman. The UN got more involved (than they did in Rwanda for example) because Gaddafi was using Shilkas rather than machetes. Of course the fact that oil's involved got everyone's attention, but this looks to me like a just intervention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinee Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. Saddam Hussein's brutality was well documented too. This is war for oil. Don't doubt it
Brutal dictators still run many countries across the globe but it's only the ones with oil underneath them that we seem to give a shit about for some reason. Why do you think that is? OIL is the casus bellum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. So should we have let Gadaffi simply murder several hundred thousand citizens?
Because that's what it would have come to. At what point do we step in and stop the slaughter? Or if he has oil is he justified in doing anything he wants to them? Are we to keep our hands in our pockets just so we won't be accused of waging war for oil? Where is the morality in that stance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinee Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. Sounds like propaganda to justify war for oil me. Hope and change my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #50
67. So why did we let him take power in 1969 and stay since then?
What makes now so urgent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. Now there's a popular uprising.
And Libyan women and children are being murdered in the streets by anti-aircraft cannon fire and snipers.

That's what's so urgent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. And so someone should stop us from doing the same, like in Iraq
and Afghanistan.

But really, you didn't answer my question - what's different NOW from 1969 or any other year in between, including Libyan aid to the Lockerbie bombing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
32. more "hope and change"TM!! Amerika, f yeah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
36. Hmmm....
MARCH 19, 2011
OBAMA: 'Today we are part of a broad coalition. We are answering the calls of a threatened people. And we are acting in the interests of the United States and the world'...

MARCH 19, 2003
BUSH: 'American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
38. oh, geez, how did I not guess "America is going to be taking the leading role" ?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinee Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
40. So, instead of getting us out of war, he dragged us into another one? He's slicker than Libyan oil.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #40
64. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
timo Donating Member (890 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
43. jeez
he cant deny the bloods on HIS hands NOW, no blaming bush for this screw up royale!!! fly bloody dove fly fly away!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
46. 3 wars instead of 2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faz Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #46
55. Sooner there will be 4, 5, 6 wars

Who would have thought when we voted for Obama?

We are duped!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
53. No problem, he went to Congress for an AUMF didn't he? No, well
he probably at least thought of complying with the law. After all, he is a professor of Constitutional law.

Who would have thought in 2008 that in 2011, he'd be breaking the law more than Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
56. We can't afford Head Start but we can ALWAYS
afford weapons that kill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. yes and then our "leaders" pass the costs onto those Head Start kids who can't get jobs as adults
Edited on Sun Mar-20-11 09:45 AM by wordpix
totally insane policies :puke:

They will end up working for Chinese shoe makers, earning $1/day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
58. World Police on the march.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marasinghe Donating Member (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #58
65. marching is so 20th century. this is the video desk jockey era of death-dealing.
can't see red blood on a green-screen & risk throwing up a good mre any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC