Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2 Bush officials in running to be next head of FBI

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:06 AM
Original message
2 Bush officials in running to be next head of FBI
Source: Associated Press

People familiar with the search for a new FBI director say two officials who worked for President George W. Bush have a realistic chance of being asked to head the bureau.

James Comey and Kenneth Wainstein served in sensitive national security-related posts in the Bush administration. That could make for interesting Senate confirmation hearings if President Barack Obama selects one of them to succeed FBI Director Robert Mueller, whose 10-year term expires Sept. 4.

The people familiar with the selection process say the service of Comey and Wainstein as political appointees under a Republican is a key factor in their being considered.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/03/20/national/w063749D21.DTL&tsp=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Ptooooey" - Honorable American Citizens
Edited on Sun Mar-20-11 10:18 AM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
29. he chooses one of them, he's a republican clear and simple for
me. letting this cartel get away was bad enough but hiring them? Criminal. Pure and simple. Hard to believe our pres is a lawyer. situational ethics thy name is obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I'll bet that one of them will end up the director!
Most Dems in Washington have become so rethuglican leaning that it is so pathetic to call these people Dems anymore. I have given up on the Dems and Obama himself. Chess-game my a**!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Weel, isn't that special.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. As if the BFEE doesn't already have enough embeds. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. No surprise here, more of the change I voted for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwishiwas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Crap that they are even being considered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. doesn't that just figure. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. Obviously, there's a lot that still needs to be covered up -- !! Disgraceful, Obama!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. Rumsfeld looks a little bored, spewing his book on TV
Edited on Sun Mar-20-11 10:22 AM by Autumn
maybe he's available. He would fit right in. Or Dick, he wouldn't have a heart attack from the stress, just a heartless dead bastard walking around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. if this is a trial balloon to the base: NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marblehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. they already control the CIA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
12. I sure hope that DUers remember James Comey!
'In early January 2006, the New York Times, as part of their investigation into alleged domestic surveillance by the National Security Agency, reported that Comey, who was Acting Attorney General during the March 2004 surgical hospitalization of John Ashcroft, refused to "certify" the legality of central aspects of the NSA program at that time. The certification was required under existing White House procedures to continue the program. After Comey's refusal, the newspaper reported, Andrew H. Card Jr., White House Chief of Staff, and Alberto R. Gonzales, then White House counsel and future Attorney General, made an emergency visit to the George Washington University Hospital <4>, to attempt to win approval directly from Ashcroft for the program.<4> Comey confirmed these events took place (but declined to confirm the specific program) in testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee on 16 May 2007.<5><6><7><8><9><10> FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III, like Comey, also supported Ashcroft's decision; both men were prepared to resign if the White House ignored the Department of Justice's legal conclusions on the wiretapping issue. FBI director Mueller's notes on the March 10, 2004 incident, which were released to a House Judiciary committee, confirms that he "Saw AG,....John Ashcroft in the room. AG is feeble, barely articulate, clearly stressed."<11> Comey withdrew his threat to resign after meeting directly with President Bush, who gave his support to making changes in the surveillance program.<12> . . .

In May 2007, Comey testified before both the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, and the House Judiciary subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law on the U.S. Attorney dismissal scandal. His testimony contradicted that of former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales that the firings had been due to poor performance on the part of some of the dismissed prosecutors. Comey stressed that the Justice Department had to be perceived as nonpartisan and nonpolitical in order to function.

“ The Department of Justice, in my view, is run by political appointees of the president. The U.S. attorneys are political appointees of the president. But once they take those jobs and run this institution, it's very important in my view for that institution to be another in American life, that -- because my people had to stand up before juries of all stripes, talk to sheriffs of all stripes, judges of all stripes. They had to be seen as the good guys, and not as either this administration or that administration.<13>'

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_B._Comey

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I support James Comey FULLY.


http://articles.cnn.com/2007-05-15/politics/ashcroft.nsa_1_comey-card-and-gonzales-attorneys-last-year?_s=PM:POLITICS

He was a hero when it counted. I would love to have him on our team.

snip>

Comey refused to say publicly that the White House officials came to the hospital to discuss the NSA program. However, government officials previously confirmed to CNN that Comey had "vigorously opposed" aspects of the surveillance program and refused to sign off on its continued use, prompting Card and Gonzales to make the hospital visit.

Comey's revelations came before the Senate Judiciary Committee as part of its investigation into the firing of eight U.S. attorneys last year.

In his testimony Tuesday, Comey recounted Ashcroft's wife calling a Justice Department official that night informing her Card and Gonzales were on their way to see Ashcroft. She had banned all outside phone calls and visitors, Comey said.

He immediately headed to the hospital and soon after he got there, the White House officials entered. He said Ashcroft, who had been weak from gall bladder surgery, "very strongly expressed himself" regarding his objections to a classified program, but added that his views didn't matter because he was, temporarily, not the attorney general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. THANK YOU!
Gotta have sanity at DU!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Hey....
when you're right, you're right!

:thumbsup:

His testimony was explosive, he said that he
knew some day he would be required to set it
out for them, and he believed it would send
people to jail.

He was wrong about the last bit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. OK. I remember that.

And I thank you for the reminder.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Well he certainly knows right from wrong & clearly defines abuses of power...
wouldn't that be refreshing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
34. Thanks for the post. It stopped my
knee from jerking. Sounds like one of the good guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. Many thanks for posting this. It's all too for people to react to seeing "Bush administration"
without knowing the facts associated with the individuals. Comey would also have my full support. In fact, I think it'd be a courageous appointment that would surprise the hell out of me if he was selected. Sorry, but my expectations are very low at this point.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Lest we forget, George Tenet was a Clinton appointee to the CIA...
Edited on Sun Mar-20-11 11:45 AM by PassingFair
and look where THAT got us!



I'll place my bets on Comey ANY DAY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
25. Many thanks for posting this. It's all too for people to react to seeing "Bush administration"
without knowing the facts associated with the individuals. Comey would also have my full support. In fact, I think it'd be a courageous appointment that would surprise the hell out of me if he was selected. Sorry, but my expectations are very low at this point.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Thanks. IMO people 'react' too much, without bothering w facts.
MUCH TOO MUCH of this going on now, esp today. Really disappoints me about DU at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. B***sh*t
So there are no good Democrats that can do the job that we must have to accept any somewhat "good" or "different from norm" B*sh operative/appointee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. ...
A highly articulate comment.

:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. Obama choose a republican for department head? No, he would never do that....would he? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
18. good god I hope not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
20. Yet anoher opportunity for the President
to show Republicans how much he's like them excepting the main reason they'd never support him, skin tone.
Maybe he just doesn't get it that every time he kisses Republican ass he loses part of his base and gains noting in return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
21. In the running for new FBI head: Comey, perhaps. Wainstein is another matter.
Edited on Sun Mar-20-11 11:02 AM by seafan
2 Bush officials in running to be next head of FBI

By PETE YOST, Associated Press
March 20, 2011


Two officials who worked for President George W. Bush, including one who threatened to resign to block legally questionable anti-terror surveillance, have a realistic chance of being asked to head the FBI, according to people familiar with the search.

James Comey and Kenneth Wainstein served in sensitive national security-related posts at the Justice Department in the Bush administration. That could make for interesting confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee if President Barack Obama selects either to succeed FBI Director Robert Mueller. His 10-year, nonrenewable term expires Sept. 4.

.....




Very interesting.


For some backstory:


NYT: Justice Deputy James B. Comey Resisted Parts of Spy Program, December 31, 2005

Remember Ashcroft in hospital: Card & Gonzales pressuring re NSA spying?, January 29, 2006



Ken Wainstein would not be a good choice, imho.


I thought that name was familiar.....Ken Wainstein. Look at this:, December 14, 2007



The way things are going these days, look for Wainstein to be pumped up 24/7.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
22. Are there no qualified Democrats?
Edited on Sun Mar-20-11 11:06 AM by somone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackspade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
23. What the hell!?
I swear Obama has lost his mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vattel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
28. Comey would be awesome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. wasn't James Comey the one who saved
the republic? Or was that a sounds like name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
35. Why not? Bush hold-overs and Cheney stay-behinds are doing a great job so far.
Why change?

Why hope?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC