Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Status-Fukushima nuclear power plants Sunday midnight (renewed nuclear chain reaction feared-Unit 4)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:49 AM
Original message
Status-Fukushima nuclear power plants Sunday midnight (renewed nuclear chain reaction feared-Unit 4)
Source: Kyodo News Japan

TOKYO, March 20, Kyodo

-- Reactor No. 1 (Operation suspended after quake)
Partial melting of core, cooling failure, vapor vented, building housing containment of reactor damaged by hydrogen explosion, roof blown off, seawater being pumped in.

-- Reactor No. 2 (Operation suspended after quake)
Damage to reactor containment structure feared, cooling failure, seawater being pumped in, fuel rods fully exposed temporarily, vapor vented, building housing containment of reactor damaged by blast at adjacent reactor No. 3, blast sound heard near suppression chamber of containment vessel, seawater pumped into pool holding spent-fuel rods on Sunday, access to external power restored Sunday.

-- Reactor No. 3 (Operation suspended after quake)
Partial melting of core feared, cooling failure, vapor vented, seawater being pumped in, building housing containment of reactor badly damaged by hydrogen explosion, seawater dumped over spent-fuel storage pool by helicopter Thursday, water sprayed at it from ground for four days in a row through Sunday.

-- Reactor No. 4 (Under maintenance when quake struck)
Renewed nuclear chain reaction feared at spent-fuel storage pool, fire at building housing containment of reactor Tuesday and Wednesday, only frame remains of reactor building roof, temperature in the pool reached 84 C on March 14, water sprayed at pool on Sunday..........."



Read more: http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2011/03/79849.html



not a good sign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wow - it's hard to keep up. I think the last I heard was essentially
they were "getting things under control".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Progress restoring power to the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant has apparently stalled
after a full day of work Sunday, although the situation has not deteriorated any further."

http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci--japan-reactor-damage-20110320,0,7441237.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. they need to cement coffin all of these nukes
Bye bye once and for all. Do it now you greedy fucking idiots!

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynzke Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Amen!
Why are they wasting so much time and risk, when this is the one and only solution. Spending one more minute won't change the outcome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mysterysoup Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Would that work, or is it too soon? Concrete decomposes at hi temps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. If there is a chain reaction occuring
I don't know if concrete would do anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Old news
This is a summary of all events since the earthquake. Please delete or amend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. no, - released on Kyodo News within last hour(it's only 2AM in Tokyo now, update is for Midnight)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's a summary.
This is describing all events to date. The fire was four days ago.

Again, please amend or delete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. The possibility of...
...renewed nuclear chain reaction at spent-fuel storage pool #4 is NOT old news.
It is frightening NEW news, at least for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Look at the post.
It's listed before news from Tuesday and Wednesday of last week.

OLD NEWS.

If you want to get concerned about something, worry about fluctuating pressure levels in #3 that might lead to a release of plutonium.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. renewed possible chain reaction in Unit 4 is not old news, nor recycled, nor a good thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. This is the first I've heard about a chain reaction possibly starting in the pool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. Please delete YOURSELF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReturnoftheDjedi Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. our resident Nuclear Physicist FrodoBaggins assured me that a renewed reaction was impossible
I guess that's what you get when you listen to an armchair physicist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. Unrecced for bullshit hysterical recycling of old news
Edited on Sun Mar-20-11 12:30 PM by wtmusic
and inability to admit error. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. the facts disprove you,sorry, but this is new, & from official sources,unrec away,its your info loss
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Irresponsible and pathetic.
Bye. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Bye.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
axollot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
35. immature - let the mods do their job. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReturnoftheDjedi Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. you're wrong, dude. TEPCO adds updates to its press releases cumulatively.
That is why there is old news mixed with new news.

The bit about a restarted chain reaction in #4 is new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. wtmusic is right, this news is out of date. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
39. +100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. I appreciate the summary which includes new info.
It is a summary of status, and nothing wrong with a summary painting the whole picture.

thank you, stockholmer.

Rec....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
20. posted 16 min ago......'we have come to a situation where we are very close to getting the
situation under control'

So who are we to believe?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110320/ap_on_bi_ge/as_japan_earthquake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReturnoftheDjedi Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. because they have gotten power back to 5 & 6 (which were never a problem), they can claim "control"
They neglect to mention that they have been unable to refill the pool at #4.
That is where a nuclear reaction could be restarting with no containment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. ah ha. nice to know somethings never change.
Last night I watched a 2004 documentary on the Three Mile Island incident. You'd think it was filmed today in Japan.....the misinformation, false assumptions, ass covering, out and out lying and, what can only be described as a completely, 'let them eat cake' arrogant callousness toward the people in harms way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TatonkaJames Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
24. The damage is already done
The amount of radiation or damage, which is not being reported, similar to the BP oil catastrophe, has contaminated everything already.
Air, ground and water. If you think 50 miles is the cut off point, forget it. Planes flying in the area then landing in the USA are detected with
low levels (supposedly). That doesn't go away, so anyone flying on these planes will be subjected to it.
The soil will grow tainted food, water also. The water in the sea flows out and spreads. The steam released goes into the atmosphere traveling around the globe.
There is so much we haven't ben told, less is best is the manta of all these large companies.
Just a bad situation for us all when six reactors are damaged. We have Chernobyl, 3 Mile Island and now this. And still, nuclear power, because of payoffs to
representatives who's states they are in refuse to oppose them and begin what is inevitable, alternative clean resources are put on hold. When will they begin
in earnest putting people back to work building what we need now for the future? Wind, solar, battery, etc power ? Just 150 square miles of solar panels in AZ would
be more than enough to run the ENTIRE United States. Google it for info.
But as we all know, they will wait until they say there is only enough oil for one year from the worlds oil supplies, create a crisis and bail out the oil companies so they
can make the switch and take over the alternative power sources, only to charge more for its use. How they will argue the Sun is costing them more each year so they
can raise prices like they do now, I can't wait to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I agree. And the thing about 'low levels' of radioactivity is - it's
your friend for life! It doesn't dissipate, it doesn't wear off, it doesn't move through your system - it's cumulative. So after enough repeated exposure to 'low levels' of radiation, we're like walking nukes! (A whopping exaggeration, granted, but you get my point.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReturnoftheDjedi Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. it's continuous at these levels from now until the day they finish sealing it all in concrete
it took 9 months to build Chernobyl's.

Who cares if it doesn't kill you on contact,
it will be continuous for months and months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. TatonkaJames
The sky is falling! The sky is falling! Or not.

I have rarely seen so much incorrect information in one post. Probably never before.

This situation is analogous to Three Mile Island, which is now completely clean after ten years (The Exxon Valdez area will probably never be clean). The PA Dept of Health followed 30,000 nearby residents of Three Mile Island for eighteen years and found no evidence of an increased incidence of cancer. Chernobyl was an entirely different situation since it had no containment and infinitely higher levels of radiation. That's what happens when our friends on Communist countries build stuff with no concern for the environment, ex: giant rivers of toxic sludge in China.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TatonkaJames Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. I was a bit off on the facts of Three Mile
But here are some studies done;
Twenty-five years later, there has been no significant rise in cancer deaths among residents living near the Three Mile Island site. A new analysis of health statistics in the region conducted by the Radiation and Public Health Project has, however, found that death rates for infants, children, and the elderly soared in the first two years after the Three Mile Island accident in Dauphin and surrounding counties.

It's not about the sky falling, it's about reality and greed. When will the oil companies give up their profits when we switch to wind, solar and battery power ? Never, they will wait until the last drop is taken and then make a crisis out of it and charge us for the fix, which will be solar, wind and battery. Until then we risk more Chernobyl's and Fukushima's. The dust particles from the explosions are in the atmosphere, fact. They travel and fall as rain on the rest of the globe. That doesn't go away.

Not looking to argue with you but no one can put up an argument that 4 - 6 reactors melting down is a good thing for all the world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. shows how insane our reps are
that or completely ignorant fools; probably both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
axollot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. Oh they'll say the cost to maintain and update the panels etc keeps going up
even tho they don't upgrade it, maybe add some changes to local transfer stations to make it look like they are "doing" something. Interesting on the square mileage/solar panels. I even know a fantastic area for them besides AZ like NV. Or bits of both. Full sun nearly all year then stored and transfer it to the sub stations. Plus sub stations w/back up batteries via local panels in every state. It has money making potential NOW but getting capital for it...good luck.

Cheers
Sandy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
26. Which explains the post of relocating US military personnel out of Japan.
We think 4 is a Roman candle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. old news, not detailed, misleading
They've actually made a lot of progress. The best news is they have electric cable run from a working electric plant and are in the process of hooking it up. Radiation levels have dropped by half at the plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReturnoftheDjedi Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. they haven't been able to get water to stay in #4 pool. rods have been exposed for days.
without containment.

it matters little if they have restored power at 5 & 6 if there is a chain reaction occurring in 4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TatonkaJames Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. Plus the spent rods
were in storage above the containment part of the reactor and when it exploded, those rods went all over the area.
Plus, the radiation is leaking next to the water so there's an steady flow of it contaminating the ocean. Not good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
33. what exactly is a Nuclear Chain Reaction?
Edited on Sun Mar-20-11 05:43 PM by fascisthunter
I found this:

"A nuclear chain reaction occurs when one nuclear reaction causes an average of one or more nuclear reactions, thus leading to a self-propagating number of these reactions. The specific nuclear reaction may be the fission of heavy isotopes (e.g. 235U) or the fusion of light isotopes (e.g. 2H and 3H). The nuclear chain reaction releases several million times more energy per reaction than any chemical reaction." - wikipedia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
37. as we already established in another thread, that link is a timeline
Edited on Sun Mar-20-11 07:02 PM by Hannah Bell
of events at every reactor, & the "fear of a chain reaction" is from the news of the 15th/16th. It is not current.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=700496&mesg_id=701145

http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&hl=en&tbs=nws:1&source=hp&q=fear+chain+reaction+pool+4&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=4902021d154fb488

i really don't understand why you posted this.

predictably, your post has done nothing but elicit a bunch of "omg's!" & "what? i just heard something completely different!"

congratulations.

you've just added to the confusion, hype & fear.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
38. chain reaction is the only reason reactors generate power
they control the heat generated by various cooling mediums and by adjusting position of fuel rods.
So when the tsunami compromised the cooling pumps, the reactors started to overheat.

But the same thing happened at TMI. What minimized the radiation leak was the containment shield.
Radiation will leak at Fukishima for sure and how much all depends on how compromised is the
containment shield. If 98-99% of it holds up then we are looking at something similar to Three Mile Island.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. plus
The rods from #4 were removed just recently, so those rods were super hot.
They placed these extra hot rods in a pool to cool.
The pool leaked and the rods are no longer being cooled.

The #4 core is empty. It is the now the rods in air that are the problem as they were the hottest of all outside in the air. That's why when #4 blew it was really big. May be the only reason we haven't yet had super problems is that the rods got blown apart somewhat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. the barrage of sea water might have helped also?
Edited on Sun Mar-20-11 10:42 PM by golfguru
Thankfully the newer reactor designs have better methods of storing spent fuel rods.
Whoever designed storing fuel rods on top of the reactor outside of the containment shield
should be run out of town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC