Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US worried over Gaddafi's mustard gas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 12:48 AM
Original message
US worried over Gaddafi's mustard gas
Edited on Mon Mar-21-11 12:49 AM by Turborama
Source: SAPA

2011-03-21 07:20

Washington - The United States is wary of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi's stockpiles of mustard gas but there is no sign he intends to deploy chemical weapons, the top US military officer said on Sunday.

"It's something we're watching very closely," Admiral Mike Mullen, chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told CBS's Face the Nation programme.

"He does have (a) store of that, a significant quantity," Mullen said when asked if Libya had stockpiles of the dangerous chemical agent. "It's something he could do a lot of damage with."

Mullen made his remarks as an international coalition concluded the initial part of a military operation to halt an offensive by Gaddafi's forces on the rebel stronghold of Benghazi in eastern Libya.

Read more: http://www.news24.com/World/News/US-worried-over-Gaddafis-mustard-gas-20110320
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Suffice it to say
if you are going to make any chemical agent, this is a very easy one to create and weaponize.

I just think WMDs have become a real bubaboo these days...

(Oh and if they have it, we do not have the receipts and bombing the site preemptively is not exactly a good idea)

But unlike other chemical munitions, you too can accidentally make a low grade of this crap in your home... and any artillery shell will do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Gas is a tricky thing...
While it's easy to make, it's not as easy to deliver via a shell as it sounds.

If they don't have the correct tech, the gas can burn up in delivery. The heating of the exterior of the shell from firing and friction during flight can dampen the effect of gas to almost nil.

But then again, they probably bought the gas from us anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. This is WW I tech
they have the technology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes and no...
Edited on Mon Mar-21-11 12:04 PM by Javaman
the delivery of gas is still very tricky.

I have a brother-in-law that was a US Army Major. He was in Artillery.

He would train with dumbed ordinance from time to time to simulate an attack.

He stated at best, that any gas shells still only have a 50/50 percent chance of being an effective ordinance. This is not even taking into wind direction.

While the tech has improved since WWI, it hasn't improved much when it involves gas. It has improved greatly with blister agents, but not a whole lot with the "traditional" types of gas.

He stated that anyone still using gas such as mustard or the like is pretty dumb. Your own army is as much at risk as is the enemy. The blister agent ordinance are not usually subject to the kind of dispersal that gas is, since it's a bit heavier.

On edit: I will state this, the use of gas certainly has a massive psychological effect on those it is fired upon. That maybe si all that gaddafi is after.

But never the less, I hope nothing of the like is ever used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I know mustard gas puts everybody at risk
as you said, it is far more in the psychological...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Night Crawler Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ya know, it's almost like someome opened a desk drawer in
the Oval Office and pulled out an old script.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanDutchy Donating Member (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Indeed, instaed they where worried at the moment they should be worried:
the moment that Bush stoled the elections and later - earlier behind curtains - Ghadaffi was 'the friend of his friend'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. That is the first thing that I thought of when I saw the title. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scottybeamer70 Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds terribly familar
from eight years past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Sure does. Now all we have to do is check the reciepts...
Edited on Mon Mar-21-11 10:00 AM by freshwest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. Good thing we're not sending ground troops. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. Meanwhile
'We must keep smallpox stocks' US and Russia tells World Health Organisation

At a meeting beginning today, the World Health Organisation will propose eradicating the American and Russian samples, which are kept in high-security facilities in Atlanta and Novosibirsk, fearing that they could be stolen or unleashed in an accident.

"Our position is that we need to have the virus collections maintained for the foreseeable future," a US official said.

Once the most deadly virus in the world, smallpox killed about a third of those who contracted it and wiped out more than half the indigenous populations of North and South America when first introduced by African slaves.

The WHO declared the virus eradicated in 1980 after the most successful vaccination scheme the world has seen.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8267370/We-must-keep-smallpox-stocks-US-and-Russia-tells-World-Health-Organisation.html

Anything capable of wiping out half the indigenous populations of North and South America even at that period in time when the total population was lower ain't worth keeping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. So do we have to "catch up" on mustard now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC