Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WikiLeaks: Gaddafi Regime Fed Names of Jihadists to CIA and Britain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:02 PM
Original message
WikiLeaks: Gaddafi Regime Fed Names of Jihadists to CIA and Britain
Edited on Mon Mar-21-11 05:03 PM by Hissyspit
Source: The Australian

Gaddafi regime fed names of jihadists to the CIA and to Britain
Alexi Mostrous From: The Times March 22, 2011 8:45AM
COLONEL Muammar Gaddafi's regime secretly provided information to Britain and the US on Islamic extremists in the east of Libya, according to leaked diplomatic cables and intelligence sources.

The names of hundreds of suspects were passed to the CIA and British intelligence.

“There was a strong, shared concern between Gaddafi and the US and UK Governments about radical Sunni jihadist terrorists, including the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG),” Paul Pillar, a CIA veteran who negotiated with Libya over its nuclear program, told The Times.

Diplomatic cables obtained by WikiLeaks paint eastern Libya as a fertile ground for radical extremism. One source told US officials in 2008 that for young men from Derna, a city east of Benghazi, “resistance against coalition forces in Iraq was an important act of 'jihad' and a last act of defiance against the Gaddafi regime”.

Read more: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/gaddafi-regime-fed-names-of-jihadists-to-uk-cia/story-fn7ycml4-1226025836662



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. So MG is an ally in the WOT?
Throws a bit of a wrench in the narrative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iterate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. He has been since 2003
Edited on Mon Mar-21-11 05:41 PM by Iterate
He's been a hero of the neocons, and they were having fits when he started gunning down protesters and shelling cities. Not that they were bothered by that, mind you, but it was public and embarrassing. He had been plenty brutal enough for years and that didn't bother them. A couple weeks later, a few days ago actually, when it was obvious that Gaddafi couldn't last, they were stern about the need for intervention, admonishing Obama with that arrogant attitude we all hate.

They've had some pretty lucrative contracts for his image rehabilitation, for setting up sovereign trust funds, "academic" papers at think tanks, security support and training (including the brigade that shelled Misurata and shot up some unarmed protesters just today. The whole city is being held/surrounded without food, water, electricity, medicine), plus arms deals, you name it.

Man, you've got a lot of catching up to do.

I posted this today, about the sources of the revolution/rebellion/uprising. Have a look.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x705484
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheLastMohican Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is more important
than people think.
Who are these lybian rebels? Where are they from? Are they lybians or other nationals? Who supplied them with so much weaponry and who trained them?
And why do they have such a great "cover" in NATO forces, that other rebels never enjoy?

These questions will never be answered by the corporate media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. They got their weapons from defections and capture of Libyan military arsenals
and now Egypt has apparently begun supplying them light weaponry. As for training, their tactics, lack of discipline, and setbacks would suggest a serious lack of real training.

As for the dominant ideology in that group, I think that remains to be seen. Hopefully, they won't hate us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. These unanswered questions are the reason that I (for as little as it is worth)
am reserving my opinion about the airstrikes, etc.

Who knows what is going on? I haven't heard any information about just what the rebels stand for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. All good questions.
I remember when the Afghanistan Taliban were called "the moral equivalent of the founding fathers" (by President Reagan, a president held in great esteem by Obama). How do we know we aren't being led down the same garden path.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iterate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. And in the very next sentence...
we learn that "Vincent Cannistraro, a former head of the CIA's Libya branch, said that Colonel Gaddafi had “sucked in” the West..."

Essentially, Gaddafi used allegations to target his own political opponents as well as occasionally giving them good information, just enough to salt the mine. The perfect neocon hero, manipulative and treacherous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Norriega re-do?
He was our bastard too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. You'd have to go back to Ho Chi Minh to find an "enemy" who wasn't "our bastard"
Well, the Sandinistas and the Ayatollahs, I guess.

But since then?

Saddam

Noriega

Bin Ladin

Hekmatyar

Gaddafi

This is not by accident, although not by master plan.

This is a logical consequence of trying to dominate the world, with a system that needs enemies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. He probably fooled them many times, giving them
names who were enemies of his regime. That's what is happening in Afghanistan. People with a gripe against someone, will give NATO names and they often use that information to bomb villages. Which is why so many civilians are being killed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. True, that's typical but our embassy staff, spies, talked to residents
They noted that the mosques in the East preached Jihad extensively and that "un-Islamic" social and cultural organisations such as sports leagues, theatres and youth clubs had been shut down. That's a real concern.

...

The cable states: "By contrast with mosques in Tripoli and elsewhere in the country, where references to jihad are extremely rare, in Benghazi and Derna they are fairly frequent subjects."

...

Another confidential cable to Washington from the US embassy in Tripoli in June 2008 described Derna as a "wellspring" of insurgent fighters and suicide bombers in Iraq.

The cable quoted a resident as saying that while "not everyone likes the bearded ones" (a reference to conservative imams), "it's jihad - it's our duty, and you're talking about people who don't have much else to be proud of".

The cable continues: "Referring to actor Bruce Willis' character in the action picture "Die Hard", who stubbornly refused to die quietly, he said many young men in Derna viewed resistance against Qadhafi's regime and against coalition forces in Iraq as an important last act of defiance."

http://www.khilafah.com/index.php/news-watch/africa/11428-libya-wikileaks-cables-warn-of-extremist-beliefs


I think they have every right to fight our injustice in Iraq and the rest of the Muslim world but this doesn't give me a very good feeling.

I'm still combing through them, there are so many.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thank you, I have read that Eastern Libya is a
'hotbed' of fundamentalists. And, like Saddam Hussein, I am sure Qadaffi was a target for them as they view secular leaders as traitors to Islam. Which is why the notion that Saddam would have ever harbored Al Queda was so ridiculous. He was terrified of them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I've only read two cables so far.
I wish I could print them off and take them to bed. I'll try to get more disciplined and go through 2 or 3 a day. I never thought of the angle you just brought up about being a traitor to Islam. That adds a whole other dimension to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Well, Osama Bin Laden referred to Saddam Hussein as a
traitor to Islam because of his modernization of Iraq. He wanted the U.S. to invade Iraq, saved him the bother of taking out Saddam himself I guess, He hoped to see an Islamic state take its place. He has gotten part of his wish. Women have lost many of the rights and freedoms they had under Saddam and Christians, eg, protected and very safe under Saddam have mostly fled Iraq now out of fear.

We really did a great job there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Not So Much Of Fundamentalists, Ma'am, As Of the Sennusi Sect
This has been a mainstay of resistance to Western incursion since the start of the twentieth century, members of the order taking the lead against the Italians in 1911, and launching attacks against England in Egypt between 1915 and 1917, then resuming resistance against Italy in the extremely vicious fighting during the 1920s in which Italy reasserted its colonial claim on the place. The old royal house was connected to the sect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. This story targets the rat. Those people he turned in are going to
be after him for revenge. I suspect that may be the reason for the leak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fool Count Donating Member (878 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. Was he stupid or what doing that? He just gave the CIA
a mailing list of who to rely on for any regime changing operation in Libya. Thank you, Colonel, our people will be in touch with you shortly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.....
...except when he isn't.

- K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
19. Oops! Mission abort. Repeat. Mission abort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
20. 21st Century Communists
So we're just meant to believe Gaddafi that the names he gave to the UK & US were jihadists?

Reminds me of when any tinpot dictator could claim their opponents were socialists or communists and the cash from the US would come rolling in, no matter whether it was true or not. I'd guess that Gaddafi figured out that the UK & US would happily take care of his political problems for him if he just claimed they were linked to groups the US doesn't like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
21. Gaddafi regime fed names of jihadists to the CIA and to Britain
Source: The Australian

Gaddafi regime fed names of jihadists to the CIA and to Britain

* Alexi Mostrous
* From: The Times
* March 22, 2011 8:45AM

COLONEL Muammar Gaddafi's regime secretly provided information to Britain and the US on Islamic extremists in the east of Libya, according to leaked diplomatic cables and intelligence sources.

The names of hundreds of suspects were passed to the CIA and British intelligence.

“There was a strong, shared concern between Gaddafi and the US and UK Governments about radical Sunni jihadist terrorists, including the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG),” Paul Pillar, a CIA veteran who negotiated with Libya over its nuclear program, told The Times.

Diplomatic cables obtained by WikiLeaks paint eastern Libya as a fertile ground for radical extremism. One source told US officials in 2008 that for young men from Derna, a city east of Benghazi, “resistance against coalition forces in Iraq was an important act of 'jihad' and a last act of defiance against the Gaddafi regime”.

Read more: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/gaddafi-regime-fed-names-of-jihadists-to-uk-cia/story-fn7ycml4-1226025836662
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. We ain't got no loyalty. Ask Saddam.
Oh wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Or Noriega.
The 1989 invasion of Panama by the United States removed him from power; he was captured, detained as a prisoner of war, and flown to the United States. Noriega was tried on eight counts of drug trafficking, racketeering, and money laundering in April 1992. Noriega's U.S. prison sentence ended in September 2007
...
Born in Panama City, Noriega was a career soldier, receiving much of his education at the Military School of Chorrillos in Lima, Peru. He also received intelligence and counterintelligence training at the School of the Americas at the U.S. Army base Fort Gulick in 1967, as well as a course in psychological operations (psyops) at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.
...
Although the relationship did not become contractual until 1967, Noriega worked with the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) from the late 1950s until the 1980s.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Noriega
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. And Noriega. Our opposition to despots is mighty random & mercurial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Oh dear God, another CIA assett that got uppity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crowman1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. How much do you wanna bet that the so-called jihadists were just people Gaddafi picked at random?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. So the US diplomatic staff was lying about talking to eyewitnesses there?
In other words US intelligence is worthless? Is that what you're saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC