Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Toxic Chemicals Injected Into Wells, Report Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:01 PM
Original message
Toxic Chemicals Injected Into Wells, Report Says
Source: New York Times

Toxic Chemicals Injected Into Wells, Report Says
By IAN URBINA
Published: April 16, 2011

WASHINGTON — Oil and gas companies injected hundreds of millions of gallons of hazardous or carcinogenic chemicals into wells in more than 13 states from 2005 to 2009, according to an investigation by Congressional Democrats.

The chemicals were used by companies during a drilling process known as hydraulic fracturing, or hydrofracking, which involves the high-pressure injection of a mixture of water, sand and chemical additives into rock formations deep underground. The process, which is being used to tap into large reserves of natural gas around the country, opens fissures in the rock to stimulate the release of oil and gas.

Hydrofracking has attracted increased scrutiny from lawmakers and environmentalists in part because of fears that the chemicals used during the process can contaminate underground sources of drinking water.

“Questions about the safety of hydraulic fracturing persist, which are compounded by the secrecy surrounding the chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluids,” said the report, which was written by Representatives Henry A. Waxman of California, Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts and Diana DeGette of Colorado.





Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/science/earth/17gas.html?_r=1&ref=us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Stunning
And I thought nothing could surprise me any more.

Sam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. And I can only imagine all the stuff that takes place that flies under the radar. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. wanna really be upset? watch the documentary "Gasland".
it's all about this process and what has been happening across the country as a result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
33. Gasland: A film by Josh Fox AND Frontline = streams online = LINK:
ABOUT THE FILM - Gasland: A film by Josh Fox
This is just one of the many absurd and astonishing revelations of a new ...
www.gaslandthemovie.com/about-the-film

"Gasland" . NOW on PBS . Mar 26, 2010
NOW talks with filmmaker Josh Fox about 'Gasland', his Sundance award-winning ...

WATCH NOW online:

http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/613/index.html


NOW talks with filmmaker Josh Fox about "Gasland", his Sundance award-winning documentary on the surprising consequences of natural gas drilling. Fox's film—inspired when the gas company came to his hometown—alleges chronic illness, animal-killing toxic waste, disastrous explosions, and regulatory missteps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaykimball Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #33
40. More info and maps
Gasland has done a great job, using modern grassroots methods, to get the word out. Ian Urbina at the NY Times, and Bryan Walsh at Time have consistently provided good info on fracking.

I posted a very good video on fracking that Bryan did at the link below.

For readers interested in learning more about the Congressional report, how fracking might effect your community, and what you can do about it, I posted links to the report, what you need to know about fracking, a good technique for keeping your elected officials accountable, and fracking maps of the US at:

http://8020vision.com/2011/04/17/congress-releases-report-on-toxic-chemicals-used-in-fracking/

Jay Kimball
8020 Vision
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #40
50. Thank you. And a hearty WELCOME to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. and the bastids will get away with it too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
31. Because Bush/Cheney gave Halliburton a legal exclusion and thus a monopoly on poisoning the planet
They actually wrote an exception into law for Halliburton exclusively, so they can use hazardous chemicals without consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does their greed know no bounds.They destroy mother earth in every aspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Only our government of "we the people" are big enough to stop them or regulate them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. In the Old West, poisoning a well would get you hanged.
Well, you good ol' boys with your NRA collections, why are you sitting by while your wells are poisoned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. how about they just have to live in the town and drink the water?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That would be justice. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. A thoughtful, though slow, solution.
And fails to provide evacuation for the innocents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. But we're not REALLY a Third World Nation. After all, the wealthy can leave
Edited on Sat Apr-16-11 05:07 PM by valerief
for wherever they want, and so as long as they don't have to drink the water, everything is peachy. The wealthy getting wealthier is the only thing that matters in this world. That's what the media tells me when I read between the lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. Our world is their sewer. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. A question,
is the stuff they are pushing down these wells any more toxic than the stuff they are bringing up? I don't know the answer, but am pretty sure the oil and gas they are bringing up is fairly toxic stuff too. I assume the toxic stuff they are pushing in goes to the same places that the oil and gas will eventually end up running through.

It certainly sounds bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appal_jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #13
28. remember why they call it fracking
Edited on Sun Apr-17-11 08:58 AM by appal_jack
I assume the toxic stuff they are pushing in goes to the same places that the oil and gas will eventually end up running through.


While the gas in the shale surely has some toxic hydrocarbons in the mix, it's all locked up in shale until the fracking process breaks it up via pressure and water and chemicals in abundance. Afterward, there are many more toxins, plus new routes between the shale layer and the aquifer, forced open by the fracking process.

-app
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R.
Another story so frightening that it is hard to follow. You wish so hard that it wasn't happening.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Special Prosecutor needed pronto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
16. Chemicals Were Injected Into Wells, Report Says
Source: NY Times By IAN URBINA Published: April 16, 2011

WASHINGTON — Oil and gas companies injected hundreds of millions of gallons of hazardous or carcinogenic chemicals into wells in more than 13 states from 2005 to 2009, according to an investigation by Congressional Democrats.

The chemicals were used by companies during a drilling process known as hydraulic fracturing, or hydrofracking, which involves the high-pressure injection of a mixture of water, sand and chemical additives into rock formations deep underground. The process, which is being used to tap into large reserves of natural gas around the country, opens fissures in the rock to stimulate the release of oil and gas.

Hydrofracking has attracted increased scrutiny from lawmakers and environmentalists in part because of fears that the chemicals used during the process can contaminate underground sources of drinking water.

“Questions about the safety of hydraulic fracturing persist, which are compounded by the secrecy .............

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/science/earth/17gas.html



Scary Title, eh? Hey, it is only hundreds of millions of gallons of hazardous or carcinogenic chemicals ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #16
17.  The framing is typical. Like there's some big mystery about the hazards.
"because of fears that the chemicals used during the process can contaminate underground sources of drinking water."

“Questions about the safety of hydraulic fracturing persist, which are compounded by the secrecy ...."


If you can light your fucking tap water on fire, there's a big problem. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. "If you can light your fucking tap water on fire, there's a big problem."
Unfortunately, that just the symptom.

I've got a sneaking suspicion that fracking for oil and gas began as a cheap way to get rid of toxic waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Folks are so worried about Japan...
and with obvious reasons but what these oil & gas companies are doing is going to fuck so much stuff up across large areas! Just imagine if they wipe out a regions access to clean water! Seriously, think about that! It makes me feel like I am living in a dream, or should I say "nightmare" how crazy this is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The abyss Donating Member (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. The "landmen" are swarming like ants all over North America
Edited on Sat Apr-16-11 08:24 PM by The abyss
They offer the property/mineral owner a standard contract of 1/8 royalty share & 30 dollars an acre bonus money.

Most have all ready bought up old wells/drill rights from company's long since out of the picture. Stuff drilled down in the 50s & 60s. They are attempting to "frack" out huge chunks of natural gas deposits that were known of long ago. They are going after gas recovery on the order of Township & Range, not individual sections or acreage. 36 square miles by adjoining 36 square miles in multiple hacks.

They will start at or on a property they already have mineral rights upon or an easily negotiated lease (BLM, Forest, State lands, etc...) They will then move around and attempt to secure mineral agreements with any of the private property owners. They all ready have a drilling scheme layed out, they will not share that information with anyone. In most states they don't have to share anything even with the state oil & gas commission until they begin production.

Individual land owners need to secure a "surface owners" agreement if they are in any way going to protect water wells, potable or livestock.

And - yes after they are done there will be people that can light off their tap water.

Beware of these vampires! And may the gods help all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Its ABOUT Fracking Time something happens on this issue, I mean damn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
47. Yes -- just stopping them would be nice -- but haven't seen anything on how to reverse -- !!
Is it even possible to undo the horrible damage they have done?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. Theres a fertilizer plant near here that has a well that is 500 plus feet deep
that they used to use for getting rid of some of there nastier shit. Not sure anymore as I don't know anyone who works there now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. And yet it continues, correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. Yes, but the advantage is, it gives you WATER that is flammable -- makes a great fire --!!!
There's a great movie on this subject -- GASLAND!!

I was aware of this horrific project -- but had no idea how far across the

states they had come -- or the immense damage they have already done.

Look for GASLAND on internet -- !!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. Netflix has Gasland on DVD
I just added it to my queue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #37
45. K/R --- everyone should look for it -- !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArcticFox Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. Turning Expenses to Profits
Secrecy being what it is, I think it is safe to assume the chemicals they're using are byproducts of some chemical process which, in any other scenario, would be extremely expensive to dispose of in an EPA-regulated hazardous waste facility.

However, instead of paying to dispose of its waste, the producer has now found a way to sell the waste to third parties, who have obtained environmental approval to release it all over the country, sometimes injecting it right into groundwater.

And all the environmental laws we spent decades putting in place to protect the environment no longer mean a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. I'm sure the invisible hand of the free market will correct this n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HankyDubs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. Yet we are incessantly bombarded
with tv commercials referring to natural gas as "cleaner" and "greener."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
38. What do the rich drink? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. Money -- ???
The Rightwing Koch Bros. Funded the DLC --

http://www.democrats.com/node/7789

http://upload.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x498414

If you knew about this, why didn't you tell us -- ?

If you didn't know, pass it along -- !!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
29. Our governor Corbought&paidfor, wants to give them free rein
Edited on Sun Apr-17-11 09:01 AM by Patiod
He appointed an oil guy, C. Alan Walker, to head his Department of Community and Economic Development, and gave him last-word authority over environmental permitting in the state of Pennsylvania, allowing him, by law, to “expedite any permit or action pending in any agency where the creation of jobs may be impacted.”

This means that the oil and gas inspectors who police the Marcellus Shale development in the state won’t be allowed to issue violations to drilling companies that they regulate any longer unless they get prior approval from Economic Development top officials.

And who is this guy the guy that Corbett appointed to fast-track ALL drilling applications? You guessed it - according to the Philadelphia Inquirer: “In 2002, he told the state he couldn’t afford to clean up polluted water flowing from 15 inactive mines that were operated by his companies. After the state won a court injunction, Walker agreed to a cleanup plan.”

And God forbid citizens would want to know more about the practice of fracking because, according to Jonathan Turley: "The Pennsylvania Office of Homeland Security has been tracking anti-gas drilling groups and their meetings — including a public screening of the film “Gasland,” a documentary about the environmental hazards of natural gas drilling. The office includes information about the groups in its weekly bulletins that are sent out to law enforcement agencies—and to companies that are drilling for gas in the Marcellus Shale."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
30. How much more insane to we need to become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #30
48. We get led down this capitalist insanity path because public doesn't trust its
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 07:17 PM by defendandprotect
own common sense!!



The Rightwing Koch Bros. Funded the DLC --

http://www.democrats.com/node/7789

http://upload.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x498414

If you knew about this, why didn't you tell us -- ?

If you didn't know, pass it along -- !!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
32. Thanks for adding the word TOXIC to the article title. NY Times should do same!!
Actually, they should use the adjective HAZARDOUS chemicals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
34. The Halliburton Loophole = Why Dick Cheney Sticks to Bottled Water
Editorial NY Times = http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/opinion/03tue3.html
The Halliburton Loophole = November 2, 2009


Among the many dubious provisions in the 2005 energy bill was one dubbed the Halliburton loophole, which was inserted at the behest of — you guessed it — then-Vice President Dick Cheney, a former chief executive of Halliburton.

It stripped the Environmental Protection Agency of its authority to regulate a drilling process called hydraulic fracturing. Invented by Halliburton in the 1940s, it involves injecting a mixture of water, sand and chemicals, some of them toxic, into underground rock formations to blast them open and release natural gas.

Hydraulic fracturing has been implicated in a growing number of water pollution cases across the country.

.............

===================
Why Dick Cheney Sticks to Bottled Water
by Michael Brune on October 15, 2010
http://ecopolitology.org/2010/10/15/why-dick-cheney-sticks-to-bottled-water

Americans should be able to drink what comes out of their taps without worrying that it will make them sick. So why would anyone insert a loophole into the Safe Drinking Water Act that subverts that basic right?.........

In 2005, Congress passed an Energy Act that included ... an exemption for hydraulic fracturing (fracking) from the protections of the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Clean Air Act. It's called the "Halliburton loophole" ......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
35. Why get hung up about a little thing like clean drinking water
When oil and gas money is at stake?

I mean, we know how much they care about human health and sustainabilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
christx30 Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
36. Thank gawd
we have a free market to self regulate itself and prevent these types of things from happening, right?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaykimball Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
39. Actions you can take and a map of fracking in the US
Ian Urbina has done a great job covering fracking for the NY Times.

For readers interested in learning more about the Congressional report, how fracking might effect your community, and what you can do about it, I posted links to the report, what you need to know about fracking, a good technique for keeping your elected officials accountable, and fracking maps of the US at:

http://8020vision.com/2011/04/17/congress-releases-report-on-toxic-chemicals-used-in-fracking/

Jay Kimball
8020 Vision
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. Great site, thanks for posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaykimball Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Fracking... Coverage in Bloomberg, Vanity Fair, and HBO
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 12:20 PM by jaykimball
You're welcome!

I wrote another piece on fracking on how the mainstream media is covering fracking. It is telling that the mainstream media is paying attention to an esoteric practice like fracking. For those readers interested, I provide some stunning video of the side-effects of fracking, along with highlights and link from stories at Vanity Fair, Bloomberg, and HBO. See:

http://8020vision.com/2010/07/06/shale-gas-exploration-the-coming-storm/

Jay Kimball
8020 Vision
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. It's getting a lot of coverage!

Very surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
44. AMAZING that this story is still just coming out -- so much damage -- and so few know???
I knew about it -- but not the widespread damage they've inflicted over

the states!! I was really shocked at how far they have gone!!

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
46. I try not to hate people
but my effort fails in cases like these :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC