Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

S&P Cuts U.S. Outlook to Negative on Fiscal Worry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 08:34 AM
Original message
S&P Cuts U.S. Outlook to Negative on Fiscal Worry
Source: Reuters

S&P cuts U.S. outlook to negative on fiscal worry
NEW YORK | Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:26am EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Standard & Poor's on Monday downgraded the outlook for the United States to negative, saying it believes there's a risk U.S. policymakers may not reach agreement on how to address the country's long-term fiscal pressures.

Read more: http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE73H2JT20110418?irpc=932
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is a political move...
and it's designed to help the Republicans with all their bullshit screeching about the deficit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Isn't it the opposite? A warning not to mess with the debt ceiling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's a warning to get some agreement for the medium term passed
So not, I think, about the debt ceiling, which is short term, but about closing the gap between Obama's plan and the Ryan fantasy (my word, not theirs, you understand). They say they're neutral on which is better, but there has to be something agreed and passed.

Full S&P document here:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/53253528/outlook-to-negative-by-S-P-on-US-18april2011
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Wow they really are inserting themselves into the longer term debate.
I guess if we don't pay employees and other things we can still cover interest payments in the debt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Absolutely!
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 01:00 PM by moondust
It (further) damages the credibility of S&P.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Or, Could Force Republicans to Raise Taxes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattSh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Thank you...
Smartest comment so far...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fredamae Donating Member (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. What B/S!
There is NO way the teapublicons will want to bear responsibility for a GLOBAL financial meltdown! They know they Absolutely Would.

How worried can they be anyway? They have All gone home for Easter Vaca. If this were a Real crises they would Still be there. So yes, this is just "politics and BS Media".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Exactly right. A belated welcome to DU, too
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fredamae Donating Member (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is the same rating agency that said mortgage-backed securities were solid investments
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 09:07 AM by Rage for Order
Forgive me if I'm less than impressed by their forecasting skills
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazylikafox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Exactly. This is a purely political move. My guess: to force Congress to reduce entitlements.
S&P showed itself to be a criminal organization complicit in the Mortgage mess by falsifying bond & derivative credit ratings to increase their business. This is part of the Wall Street drive to force Congress to think it has to decimate entitlements to decrease the deficit. I'm curious to know who is really behing this move. The timing stinks to high heaven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoralme Donating Member (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. This agency was taken over by the coporatists long ago, and is
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 09:53 AM by neoralme
now approximately worthless. The real trouble is we are in a situation where there is not enough educated informed base to revolt against the corporatists. They now have their walls built strongly enough that the only thing that will take them down is total dissolution of society. And that's coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. You beat me to it!
I was going to say the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. That tidbit should be worked into their 'downgrade'
You know, full disclosure and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Rolling Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. a Reversal of "Reaganomics"
Welcome to the first step in reversing the excesses that began in 1980 under Reagan. The markets are saying that the US policy of unrealistically low tax rates and ridiculously high war expenses are unsustainable. That's what it means.

When markets decline (even commodity oil prices are tanking, if you'll excuse the pun) they are saying "the party's over" ---it will be harder on "the wealthy" than the middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. President Obama and the Democrats need to frame this right and
it can work for us. S&P does not say who they are talking to - us or them. We need to frame it so that it is THEM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC