Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wiretapping leak probe dropped

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 12:44 PM
Original message
Wiretapping leak probe dropped
Edited on Tue Apr-26-11 12:46 PM by kpete
Source: Politico

Wiretapping leak probe dropped
By: Josh Gerstein
April 26, 2011 10:59 AM EDT

The Justice Department has dropped its long-running criminal investigation of a lawyer who publicly admitted leaking information about President George W. Bush’s top-secret warrantless wiretapping program to The New York Times — disclosures that Bush vehemently denounced as a breach of national security. They also stoked a congressional debate about whether the government had overstepped its authority as it scrambled to respond to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

The decision not to prosecute former Justice Department lawyer Thomas Tamm means it is unlikely that anyone will ever be charged for the disclosures that led to the Times’s Pulitzer Prize-winning story in December 2005 revealing that, after the Sept. 11 attacks, Bush ordered the interception of certain phone calls and email messages into and out of the U.S. without a warrant — a move many lawyers contend violated the 1978 law governing intelligence-related wiretaps.

The petering out of the warrantless wiretapping leak investigation amounts to a low-profile and ambiguous conclusion to an episode that dominated the headlines in the second half of the Bush administration. While Washington is immersed in the latest round of Wikileaks revelations and the investigation into new disclosures of a trove of government secrets, the dropped wiretapping investigation amounts to the final chapter of the most significant leak of the Bush era.

The Justice Department would not discuss the current status of the probe, which began in late 2005, after the Times story was published, with a formal leak complaint from the National Security Agency. However, Tamm’s attorney, Paul Kemp, told POLITICO he and his client were informed “seven or eight months ago” that the investigation into Tamm was over.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0411/53718.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SugarShack Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why am i not surprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllTooEasy Donating Member (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'm happy and surprised. The guy who outed Bush is off the hook!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder if they dropped this investigation out of fear
that it would reveal facts that would have made it even more imperative to prosecute the criminal bush cabal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. That has to be it.
Discovery would have been a bitch.

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. The genius of Bush & Co. was to get the term "warrantless wiretapping" out there
...instead of "Illegal wiretap".

They willfully ignored the process of obtaining warrants for wiretaps and even the FISA court (which approves warrants *after* you've wiretapped and grants them on a super secret basis to preserve methods and sources) and spied on folks left and right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. It means it will happen again.
Unless we unseat this corrupt status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. The story says the whistleblower is no longer being prosecuted. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. When they stop an investigation it also stops the discovery process
I bet there was more to be uncovered and the whistle blower would have been in his full rights to dig further through depositions. I suspect that's why they didn't want to prosecute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Likely so. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC