Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Administration Considers a Post for National Intelligence Director

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 12:39 AM
Original message
Administration Considers a Post for National Intelligence Director
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/16/politics/16INTE.html?th=&pagewanted=print&position=

April 16, 2004

Administration Considers a Post for National Intelligence Director
By DOUGLAS JEHL

WASHINGTON, April 15 — The White House is weighing whether to pre-empt the Sept. 11 commission's final report this summer by embracing a proposal to create a powerful new post of director of national intelligence, administration officials said on Thursday.

Under the proposal, management of the government's 15 intelligence agencies, and control of their budgets, would be put under the direction of a single person. That authority is now scattered across a number of departments and agencies.

The plan, drafted more than a year ago by a presidential advisory panel headed by Brent Scowcroft, the former national security adviser, was given little White House attention until now. It is being reviewed, the officials said, as a possible answer to the Sept. 11 commission's preliminary conclusion that the current organization of the government's intelligence agencies has left no one truly in charge on intelligence matters.

In two days of hearings this week, the panel presented a withering dissection of American intelligence agencies, with commissioners signaling that they were preparing to call for more central control.

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well if the Nat'l Security Advisor doesn't have any Intelligence then
I could see a post for Nat'l Intelligence Director.

BUT

Condi, is intelligent, she's just a Liar...

So what * is actually saying is...

If the Nat'l Security Advisor is a Liar then you will need to hire a National Itelligence Director.

Did I get that right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. you got that right n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. What the hell is the NSA for?
This is just stupid. So, not only do they lie under oath, but they'll now try forcing our own American "Secret Police" organization down our throats. Pffft...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. the 9-11 commission
which so many hoped would finally get some answers about 9-11 has turned out to be a cheer-leading session for the PATRIOT act, and a forum for calls for more 'big brother'.

btw, What happens when someone commits perjury before this commission? Both Rice and Ashcroft have clearly committed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gunit_Sangh Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. re: Perjury penalty
Edited on Fri Apr-16-04 05:03 AM by Gunit_Sangh
If you're a repug ... you're invited for an afternoon tea with * to enjoy a stimulating conversation on the merits of t-ball.

If a Clinton admin official ... your ass is hauled off to Gitmo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. Another fucking bureaucracy?
WTF is Condi supposed to be doing. These guys are nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnOneillsMemory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. As usual, the appearance of responsiveness.
As Ghandi said when asked about western civilization:
"National Intelligence? I think that it would be a good idea..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. At least you won't be able to say Bush did'nt create any jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Thanks for the smile
I was furious reading about this idea and you just made me laugh. Thanks.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. Too much power in the
hands of one regime appointee, I don't like this at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC