Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama’s antitrust cop to step down

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 07:00 PM
Original message
Obama’s antitrust cop to step down
Source: The Washington Post

President Obama’s top antitrust cop, Christine Varney, is stepping down from her post to join a prestigious law firm, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Varney came into her job with high expectations that she would launch landmark cases against increasingly dominant firms such as Google. But she leaves for a senior position at Cravath, Swaine & Moore amid disappointment from some antitrust watchers and consumer advocates who say the Justice Department has been too soft on industry giants.

Under Varney, the Justice Department approved the controversial marriage of Ticketmaster and LiveNation, Google’s acquisition of a powerful travel software firm, and NBC’s merger with Comcast. In each of these instances, Varney tried attaching limits on how the companies could behave.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/obamas-antitrust-cop-to-step-down/2011/07/06/gIQApS630H_story.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. So long, and thanks for nothing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nothing to do. I think it was a layoff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Anything too-big-to fail should come under anti-trust
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. She got what she wanted.

An opportunity to demonstrate her ability to protect the interests of corporations, those she was sworn to scrutinize.

Nice.

To be fair, her Wiki page shows a few decent efforts, but also a number of giants she defended. Her pedigree has a whiff of DLC.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christine_A._Varney

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Cop couldn't eat any more doughnuts. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
21st Century FDR Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. We need some Roosevelt spirits haunting this administration.
FDR on the economic team and cousin Teddy in the Justice department. These recent mergers (Comcast/NBC & Ticketbastard/Live Nation) were appalling. As was Chase taking over Washington Mutual or the pending AT&T/T-Mobile thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Never knew we had one......Has anyone ever been paid more for less accomplishment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Did she have a nice rest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Springer9 Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Looks like Cravath needed an infusion of new blood and an
insider to boot, their profits have slipped a bit,

In 2010, Cravath was ranked fifth in The American Lawyer's annual listing of highest profits per partner. In 2008, Cravath posted profits per partner of $3,300,000—the second most among all firms. While Cravath had for many years generated the highest profits per partner of any large law firm worldwide, rival New York firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, the mergers and acquisitions powerhouse, has generated larger profits during the last several years, earning profits per partner of $4,945,000 in 2008. In addition, several other New York law firms, such as Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft ($2,725,000); Simpson Thacher & Bartlett ($2,875,000); and Sullivan & Cromwell ($3,055,000) have recently generated profits per partner approaching Cravath's.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cravath,_Swaine_%26_Moore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. And who are some of Cravath, Swain & Moore's clients?
...notable roster of longstanding clients, which include JPMorgan Chase, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs and Citigroup.

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP’s New York-centered antitrust practice handles litigation, advisory work and investigations, and its traditional strength in litigation has been supplemented by a substantial increase in merger-related work. The firm has experience of working in most industry sectors but has a particularly strong focus in cable, media, pharmaceuticals, healthcare, airlines, consumer products, high-tech hardware and software, and financial services.


What a crock of shit. How the fuck do these people, meaning Obama and his minions, sleep at night?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. "Obama and his minions, sleep at night"
In featherbeds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Rust never sleeps. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. wait, we had someone doing anti-trust this whole time?
Must've been a black-ops thing, some kind of super-secret squirrel ninja post, cos I've never heard of it (or Varney) before now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marasinghe Donating Member (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. trustbusting is so early 20th century,
to give her credit, she did try to bring some comic relief to the main agenda.
from the O/P: ".... Under Varney, the Justice Department approved the controversial marriage of Ticketmaster and LiveNation, Google’s acquisition of a powerful travel software firm, and NBC’s merger with Comcast. In each of these instances, Varney tried attaching limits on how the companies could behave ...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. Who knew ??
Who knew that Obama had an antitrust cop?:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulap Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. That's exacty what I was thinking.
How come I have never heard of this person?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. We had an anti-trust cop? Didn't Varney die a while back?
I mean, the Ernest Worell thing was funny for a bit, but grew old quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC